🐛 Fix issues with email change flow #1495
Conversation
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎
1 Skipped Deployment
|
|
Warning Rate limit exceeded@lukevella has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 22 minutes and 26 seconds before requesting another review. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. 📒 Files selected for processing (2)
WalkthroughThis pull request focuses on enhancing user communication regarding email management. The changes involve updating localization strings in the web application and email templates, specifically addressing scenarios related to email usage and change requests. The modifications aim to provide clearer instructions to users when they encounter email-related actions, such as during registration or when requesting an email change. Changes
Sequence DiagramsequenceDiagram
participant User
participant WebApp
participant EmailService
User->>WebApp: Attempt email change
WebApp->>EmailService: Send email change request
EmailService-->>User: Send verification email
User->>WebApp: Confirm email change
WebApp->>WebApp: Validate and process change
WebApp-->>User: Confirm successful email update
Possibly related PRs
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
apps/web/src/app/[locale]/(admin)/settings/profile/profile-settings.tsx (1)
63-63: Consider adding specific validation messages.While FormMessage will show validation errors, consider customizing the messages for better user experience.
- <FormMessage /> + <FormMessage + error={{ + required: t("nameRequired", "Name is required"), + min: t("nameMin", "Name must be at least 1 character"), + max: t("nameMax", "Name cannot exceed 100 characters") + }} + />apps/web/src/app/[locale]/(admin)/settings/profile/profile-email-address.tsx (1)
26-28: Consider strengthening email validation.While zod's built-in email validator is good, consider adding additional constraints for better security and UX.
const emailChangeFormData = z.object({ - email: z.string().email(), + email: z.string() + .min(5, "Email must be at least 5 characters") + .max(254, "Email cannot exceed 254 characters") + .email("Please enter a valid email address") + .transform((email) => email.toLowerCase()), });
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
apps/web/src/app/[locale]/(admin)/settings/profile/profile-email-address.tsx(2 hunks)apps/web/src/app/[locale]/(admin)/settings/profile/profile-settings.tsx(3 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (4)
- GitHub Check: Unit tests
- GitHub Check: Type check
- GitHub Check: Linting
- GitHub Check: Integration tests
🔇 Additional comments (4)
apps/web/src/app/[locale]/(admin)/settings/profile/profile-settings.tsx (2)
20-22: LGTM! Well-structured validation schema.The name validation constraints (1-100 characters) are reasonable and the schema is properly defined.
30-34: LGTM! Clean form configuration.Good separation of concerns by moving email management to a separate component and proper integration of zod validation.
apps/web/src/app/[locale]/(admin)/settings/profile/profile-email-address.tsx (2)
35-40: LGTM! Clean form setup with validation.Good integration of zod schema with react-hook-form and proper default value handling.
105-105: Verify form reset timing.The form reset is correctly placed after successful mutation, but ensure it doesn't interfere with the success message display.
✅ Verification successful
Form reset timing is correctly implemented ✅
The reset timing won't interfere with the success message display because:
- The toast system has a 2-second display duration
- This implementation follows the same pattern used successfully throughout the codebase
- Toast notifications are managed independently of form state
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for similar patterns in other form handlers rg -A 5 "reset\(.*\)" --type ts --type tsxLength of output: 72
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for form reset patterns with correct file types rg -t typescript -t javascriptreact -t typescriptreact "reset\(" -A 5 # Search for success message patterns near reset calls rg -t typescript -t javascriptreact -t typescriptreact "reset\(.*\).*success" -B 5 -A 5 # Use ast-grep to find mutation success handlers ast-grep --pattern 'onSuccess: ($$$) => { $$$ }'Length of output: 284
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Find files containing reset calls fd -e ts -e tsx -x rg -l "reset\(" # Search for reset calls in context fd -e ts -e tsx -x rg -B 10 -A 5 "onSuccess.*\{" {} \; # Look for toast/notification patterns near reset fd -e ts -e tsx -x rg -B 5 -A 5 "toast|notification|success.*message" {} \;Length of output: 27946
Summary by CodeRabbit
User Experience Improvements
Form Validation Enhancements