RFC: Support Variadic User-Defined Type Functions

[TenebrisNoctua]

Rendered

[cheesycod]

Personally, I fully disagree with the rfc on the basis that it’ll probably lead to postponing the new type solvers release by several months if not years due to all the bugs that’ll probably arise from variadic type functions etc. and I think it’s more important to get all the bugs fixed first over adding new features (and this one, from a cursory read, feels pretty complicated implementation wise)

Other than that, I personally fully agree with the idea.

[TenebrisNoctua]

Personally, I fully disagree with the rfc on the basis that it’ll probably lead to postponing the new type solvers release by several months if not years due to all the bugs that’ll probably arise from variadic type functions etc. and I think it’s more important to get all the bugs fixed first over adding new features (and this one, from a cursory read, feels pretty complicated implementation wise)

Other than that, I personally fully agree with the idea.

I understand the concern, but I believe it won't cause any important delays for the new type-solver's release.
I also don't see the potential for many bugs either, it behaves the same as normal variadic functions, except now it's in the type-runtime.