-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
feat: un async merge #27
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
|
Caution Review failedThe pull request is closed. Note Other AI code review bot(s) detectedCodeRabbit has detected other AI code review bot(s) in this pull request and will avoid duplicating their findings in the review comments. This may lead to a less comprehensive review. WalkthroughConverted Batcher.merge from async to sync by removing Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
autonumber
participant Test as tests/dummyui.rs
participant Batcher as src/launcher/batcher.rs
rect rgb(240,255,240)
Note left of Test: New (synchronous) flow
Test->>Batcher: merge(buff_a, buff_b)
Batcher-->>Test: bool (merged?)
end
rect rgb(255,245,240)
Note left of Test: Old (async) flow
Test->>Batcher: merge(buff_a, buff_b) (returns Future)
Test->>Test: await future
Batcher-->>Test: bool (merged?) after await
end
Estimated code review effort🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~10 minutes Possibly related PRs
Poem
Pre-merge checks and finishing touches❌ Failed checks (1 warning)
✅ Passed checks (2 passed)
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro 📒 Files selected for processing (2)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
Summary of ChangesHello @satler-git, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed! This pull request refactors the Highlights
Using Gemini Code AssistThe full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips. Invoking Gemini You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either
Customization To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a Limitations & Feedback Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here. You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension. Footnotes
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Code Review
This pull request simplifies the Batcher by making the merge function synchronous, which aligns with the existing documentation's recommendation for its usage. The change is straightforward and correctly applied in the test suite. I've added one comment regarding a necessary documentation update to keep it consistent with the code changes. Overall, this is a good simplification.
394fcdf to
190904a
Compare
CodSpeed Performance ReportMerging #27 will not alter performanceComparing Summary
Footnotes |
Summary by CodeRabbit
Refactor
Tests