Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Integrated code lifecycle: Pause all build agents #9892

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: develop
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

BBesrour
Copy link
Member

@BBesrour BBesrour commented Nov 28, 2024

Checklist

General

Server

  • Important: I implemented the changes with a very good performance and prevented too many (unnecessary) and too complex database calls.
  • I strictly followed the principle of data economy for all database calls.
  • I strictly followed the server coding and design guidelines.
  • I added multiple integration tests (Spring) related to the features (with a high test coverage).
  • I added pre-authorization annotations according to the guidelines and checked the course groups for all new REST Calls (security).
  • I documented the Java code using JavaDoc style.

Client

  • Important: I implemented the changes with a very good performance, prevented too many (unnecessary) REST calls and made sure the UI is responsive, even with large data (e.g. using paging).
  • I strictly followed the principle of data economy for all client-server REST calls.
  • I strictly followed the client coding and design guidelines.
  • Following the theming guidelines, I specified colors only in the theming variable files and checked that the changes look consistent in both the light and the dark theme.
  • I added multiple integration tests (Jest) related to the features (with a high test coverage), while following the test guidelines.
  • I added authorities to all new routes and checked the course groups for displaying navigation elements (links, buttons).
  • I documented the TypeScript code using JSDoc style.
  • I added multiple screenshots/screencasts of my UI changes.
  • I translated all newly inserted strings into English and German.

Changes affecting Programming Exercises

  • High priority: I tested all changes and their related features with all corresponding user types on a test server configured with the integrated lifecycle setup (LocalVC and LocalCI).

We want to give admins the possibility to pause all agents with a simple click

Steps for Testing

Prerequisites:

  • 1 Admin
  • Test server 3
  1. Navigate to build agents.
  2. Try to pause and resume build agents.
  3. Try to pause individual agents and then resume all agents.
  4. Try to mess around with pause, resume individual/all build agents

Testserver States

Note

These badges show the state of the test servers.
Green = Currently available, Red = Currently locked
Click on the badges to get to the test servers.







Review Progress

Performance Review

  • I (as a reviewer) confirm that the client changes (in particular related to REST calls and UI responsiveness) are implemented with a very good performance even for very large courses with more than 2000 students.
  • I (as a reviewer) confirm that the server changes (in particular related to database calls) are implemented with a very good performance even for very large courses with more than 2000 students.

Code Review

  • Code Review 1
  • Code Review 2

Manual Tests

  • Test 1
  • Test 2

Performance Tests

  • Test 1
  • Test 2

Test Coverage

Screenshots

image

image

image

Summary by CodeRabbit

Release Notes

  • New Features

    • Introduced endpoints for pausing and resuming all build agents.
    • Added buttons for pausing and resuming all agents with confirmation modals in the UI.
    • Enhanced localization with new alert messages for bulk operations.
    • Implemented user feedback alerts for success and error scenarios when managing build agents.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Updated URL paths for pausing and resuming individual agents to ensure consistency.
  • Documentation

    • Improved user interface text for clarity regarding build agent management actions.
  • Tests

    • Expanded test coverage for new features, including success and error scenarios for pausing and resuming all agents.

@BBesrour BBesrour self-assigned this Nov 28, 2024
@BBesrour BBesrour requested a review from a team as a code owner November 28, 2024 00:12
@github-actions github-actions bot added tests server Pull requests that update Java code. (Added Automatically!) client Pull requests that update TypeScript code. (Added Automatically!) core Pull requests that affect the corresponding module programming Pull requests that affect the corresponding module labels Nov 28, 2024
@BBesrour BBesrour changed the title 'Integrated code lifecycle': Pause all build agents Integrated code lifecycle: Pause all build agents Nov 28, 2024
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 28, 2024

Walkthrough

The pull request introduces enhancements to the management of build agents within the AdminBuildJobQueueResource, SharedQueueManagementService, and related components. It adds new endpoints for pausing and resuming all agents, updates existing endpoints for individual agents, and introduces new methods to handle bulk actions. The user interface is modified to include buttons for these actions, accompanied by confirmation modals. Additionally, localization files are updated to reflect new alert messages and UI labels, and test suites are expanded to cover new functionalities and error handling scenarios.

Changes

File Change Summary
src/main/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/core/web/admin/AdminBuildJobQueueResource.java - Updated URL paths for pausing/resuming individual agents.
- Added methods for pausing/resuming all agents.
src/main/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/service/localci/SharedQueueManagementService.java - Added methods to pause and resume all build agents, iterating over individual agents.
src/main/webapp/app/localci/build-agents/build-agent-summary/build-agent-summary.component.html - Reorganized HTML layout.
- Added buttons for pausing/resuming all agents with confirmation modal.
src/main/webapp/app/localci/build-agents/build-agent-summary/build-agent-summary.component.ts - Added methods for pausing/resuming all agents.
- Updated icon visibility and logic for build capacity calculation.
src/main/webapp/app/localci/build-agents/build-agents.service.ts - Updated endpoint URLs for pausing/resuming individual agents.
- Added methods for pausing/resuming all agents.
src/main/webapp/i18n/de/buildAgents.json - Added new alert messages and UI labels for actions affecting all agents.
src/main/webapp/i18n/en/buildAgents.json - Rephrased existing alert messages and added new keys for bulk operations.
src/test/javascript/spec/component/localci/build-agents/build-agent-summary.component.spec.ts - Updated tests to include new methods and error handling for pausing/resuming agents.
src/test/javascript/spec/component/localci/build-agents/build-agents.service.spec.ts - Adjusted tests for updated HTTP request URLs and added tests for bulk pausing/resuming.
src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/icl/LocalCIResourceIntegrationTest.java - Updated integration tests for new endpoint paths and added tests for pausing all agents.

Possibly related PRs

Suggested labels

ready to merge, buildagent, feature

Suggested reviewers

  • SimonEntholzer
  • JohannesStoehr
  • az108
  • krusche

Warning

There were issues while running some tools. Please review the errors and either fix the tool’s configuration or disable the tool if it’s a critical failure.

🔧 pmd (7.7.0)
src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/icl/LocalCIResourceIntegrationTest.java

The following rules are missing or misspelled in your ruleset file category/vm/bestpractices.xml: BooleanInstantiation, DontImportJavaLang, DuplicateImports, EmptyFinallyBlock, EmptyIfStmt, EmptyInitializer, EmptyStatementBlock, EmptyStatementNotInLoop, EmptySwitchStatements, EmptySynchronizedBlock, EmptyTryBlock, EmptyWhileStmt, ExcessiveClassLength, ExcessiveMethodLength, ImportFromSamePackage, MissingBreakInSwitch, SimplifyBooleanAssertion. Please check your ruleset configuration.


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai or @coderabbitai title anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 8

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (15)
src/main/webapp/i18n/en/buildAgents.json (2)

26-27: Consider rephrasing for better clarity.

The messages are informative but could be slightly improved for readability.

-                "buildAgentsPaused": "Pause request sent to all build agents. The agents will not accept new build jobs and will gracefully finish the current build jobs or will cancel them after a configurable seconds.",
+                "buildAgentsPaused": "Pause request sent to all build agents. Agents will not accept new build jobs and will gracefully finish current jobs or cancel them after the configured timeout.",
-                "buildAgentsResumed": "Resume request sent to all build agents. The agents will start accepting new build jobs."
+                "buildAgentsResumed": "Resume request sent to all build agents. Agents will now accept new build jobs."

31-33: Improve warning message formatting.

The warning message uses a raw newline character (\n). Consider using proper JSON string formatting for better maintainability.

-            "pauseAllWarning": "You are about to pause all build agents. This will prevent them from processing any new build jobs.\nAre you sure you want to proceed?"
+            "pauseAllWarning": "You are about to pause all build agents. This will prevent them from processing any new build jobs. Are you sure you want to proceed?"
src/main/webapp/i18n/de/buildAgents.json (2)

31-32: Fix capitalization inconsistency in button labels.

The capitalization is inconsistent between "Alle Agenten Anhalten" and "Alle Agenten fortsetzen". In German, both verbs should be capitalized when used as button labels.

  "pauseAll": "Alle Agenten Anhalten",
- "resumeAll": "Alle Agenten fortsetzen",
+ "resumeAll": "Alle Agenten Fortsetzen",

33-33: Consider using HTML line break for better rendering control.

While "\n" works for line breaks, using HTML <br> tags is more common in UI messages and provides better control over rendering across different platforms.

- "pauseAllWarning": "Du bist dabei, alle Build-Agenten anzuhalten. Dies wird verhindern, dass sie neue Build-Jobs verarbeiten.\nBist du sicher, dass du fortfahren möchtest?"
+ "pauseAllWarning": "Du bist dabei, alle Build-Agenten anzuhalten. Dies wird verhindern, dass sie neue Build-Jobs verarbeiten.<br>Bist du sicher, dass du fortfahren möchtest?"
src/main/webapp/app/localci/build-agents/build-agents.service.ts (2)

43-52: Add JSDoc return type documentation.

While the implementation is correct, consider enhancing the documentation with return type information.

    /**
     * Pause All Build Agents
+    * @returns Observable<void> Completes when all agents are paused
     */
    pauseAllBuildAgents(): Observable<void> {

    /**
     * Resume all Build Agents
+    * @returns Observable<void> Completes when all agents are resumed
     */
    resumeAllBuildAgents(): Observable<void> {

Also applies to: 66-75


43-52: Consider enhancing the response type.

The bulk operations could benefit from returning information about the number of agents affected. This would help with user feedback and debugging.

-    pauseAllBuildAgents(): Observable<void> {
-        return this.http.put<void>(`${this.adminResourceUrl}/agents/pause-all`, null)
+    interface BulkOperationResult {
+        affectedAgents: number;
+    }
+
+    pauseAllBuildAgents(): Observable<BulkOperationResult> {
+        return this.http.put<BulkOperationResult>(`${this.adminResourceUrl}/agents/pause-all`, null)

-    resumeAllBuildAgents(): Observable<void> {
-        return this.http.put<void>(`${this.adminResourceUrl}/agents/resume-all`, null)
+    resumeAllBuildAgents(): Observable<BulkOperationResult> {
+        return this.http.put<BulkOperationResult>(`${this.adminResourceUrl}/agents/resume-all`, null)

Also applies to: 66-75

src/main/webapp/app/localci/build-agents/build-agent-summary/build-agent-summary.component.ts (2)

98-100: Consider adding type safety for modal parameter.

Instead of using any, consider creating an interface or using NgbModal's types for better type safety.

-displayPauseBuildAgentModal(modal: any) {
+displayPauseBuildAgentModal(modal: NgbModalRef) {

Line range hint 1-139: Consider adding comprehensive test coverage.

Given the critical nature of this feature (pausing all build agents), please ensure comprehensive test coverage for:

  1. Success and error scenarios for both pause and resume operations
  2. Loading states and concurrent operation prevention
  3. Modal interaction and proper cleanup
  4. Updated build capacity calculation logic
src/test/javascript/spec/component/localci/build-agents/build-agents.service.spec.ts (3)

150-164: Enhance test coverage for bulk operations

While the basic test structure is good, consider enhancing these tests to verify the success path more thoroughly.

 it('should pause all build agents', () => {
-    service.pauseAllBuildAgents().subscribe();
+    service.pauseAllBuildAgents().subscribe(response => {
+      expect(response).toBeDefined();
+      // Add specific expectations based on the expected response
+    });

     const req = httpMock.expectOne(`${service.adminResourceUrl}/agents/pause-all`);
     expect(req.request.method).toBe('PUT');
     req.flush({});
 });

 it('should resume all build agents', () => {
-    service.resumeAllBuildAgents().subscribe();
+    service.resumeAllBuildAgents().subscribe(response => {
+      expect(response).toBeDefined();
+      // Add specific expectations based on the expected response
+    });

     const req = httpMock.expectOne(`${service.adminResourceUrl}/agents/resume-all`);
     expect(req.request.method).toBe('PUT');
     req.flush({});
 });

Line range hint 201-233: Strengthen error handling assertions

The error handling tests follow good practices but could be more specific in their assertions.

 it('should handle pause all build agents error', async () => {
     const errorMessage = 'Failed to pause build agents';
+    const statusCode = 500;
+    const statusText = 'Internal Server Error';

     const observable = lastValueFrom(service.pauseAllBuildAgents());

     const req = httpMock.expectOne(`${service.adminResourceUrl}/agents/pause-all`);
     expect(req.request.method).toBe('PUT');
-    req.flush({ message: errorMessage }, { status: 500, statusText: 'Internal Server Error' });
+    req.flush({ message: errorMessage }, { status: statusCode, statusText });

     try {
         await observable;
         throw new Error('expected an error, but got a success');
     } catch (error) {
-        expect(error.message).toContain(errorMessage);
+        expect(error.status).toBe(statusCode);
+        expect(error.statusText).toBe(statusText);
+        expect(error.message).toBe(errorMessage);
     }
 });

Apply similar improvements to the resume all agents error handling test.


Line range hint 1-233: Overall test structure follows best practices

The test suite demonstrates good practices:

  • Proper use of beforeEach for setup
  • Consistent use of HttpTestingController for HTTP mocking
  • Comprehensive error handling
  • Clear test descriptions
  • Proper cleanup with afterEach

Consider adding test cases for:

  • Request body validation for PUT requests
  • Edge cases like empty responses
  • Network timeouts
src/main/webapp/app/localci/build-agents/build-agent-summary/build-agent-summary.component.html (1)

3-21: Consider enhancing button states for better UX.

The layout and organization look good, but consider these UX improvements:

  1. Add loading states to buttons during API calls
  2. Consider adding aria-labels to buttons for better accessibility
  3. Add tooltips to explain the impact of each action
 <button class="btn btn-success" (click)="resumeAllBuildAgents()"
+        [disabled]="isLoading"
+        aria-label="Resume all build agents"
+        tooltip="Resume all paused build agents">
     <fa-icon [icon]="faPlay" />
+    @if (isLoading) {
+        <span class="spinner-border spinner-border-sm" role="status"></span>
+    }
     <span jhiTranslate="artemisApp.buildAgents.resumeAll"></span>
 </button>
src/test/javascript/spec/component/localci/build-agents/build-agent-summary.component.spec.ts (1)

5-5: Enhance mock service responses for better test coverage

The mock responses for pauseAllBuildAgents and resumeAllBuildAgents return empty objects. Consider using more realistic mock responses that match the actual service implementation.

 const mockBuildAgentsService = {
     getBuildAgentSummary: jest.fn().mockReturnValue(of([])),
-    pauseAllBuildAgents: jest.fn().mockReturnValue(of({})),
-    resumeAllBuildAgents: jest.fn().mockReturnValue(of({})),
+    pauseAllBuildAgents: jest.fn().mockReturnValue(of({ success: true, message: 'All agents paused' })),
+    resumeAllBuildAgents: jest.fn().mockReturnValue(of({ success: true, message: 'All agents resumed' })),
 };

Also applies to: 17-17, 31-32

src/main/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/core/web/admin/AdminBuildJobQueueResource.java (1)

Line range hint 198-215: Consider enhancing error handling for edge cases

While the implementation is clean and well-documented, consider adding explicit error handling for cases such as:

  • Agent not found
  • Agent already paused
  • Agent in an invalid state
 @PutMapping("agents/{agentName}/pause")
 public ResponseEntity<Void> pauseBuildAgent(@PathVariable String agentName) {
     log.debug("REST request to pause agent {}", agentName);
-    localCIBuildJobQueueService.pauseBuildAgent(agentName);
-    return ResponseEntity.noContent().build();
+    try {
+        localCIBuildJobQueueService.pauseBuildAgent(agentName);
+        return ResponseEntity.noContent().build();
+    } catch (IllegalArgumentException e) {
+        log.warn("Agent {} not found", agentName);
+        return ResponseEntity.notFound().build();
+    } catch (IllegalStateException e) {
+        log.warn("Cannot pause agent {}: {}", agentName, e.getMessage());
+        return ResponseEntity.badRequest().build();
+    }
 }
src/main/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/service/localci/SharedQueueManagementService.java (1)

157-167: Consider adding validation and concurrent modification protection

The bulk operations could benefit from additional safeguards:

  1. Validate agent states before operations
  2. Handle concurrent modifications
  3. Return operation results

Consider these architectural improvements:

  1. Create a result class to track operation outcomes:
public record BuildAgentOperationResult(
    List<String> successfulAgents,
    List<String> failedAgents,
    List<String> skippedAgents
) {}
  1. Enhance the methods to return results and handle concurrency:
public BuildAgentOperationResult pauseAllBuildAgents() {
    log.info("Initiating pause operation for all build agents");
    List<String> successfulAgents = Collections.synchronizedList(new ArrayList<>());
    List<String> failedAgents = Collections.synchronizedList(new ArrayList<>());
    List<String> skippedAgents = Collections.synchronizedList(new ArrayList<>());
    
    getBuildAgentInformation().parallelStream().forEach(agent -> {
        String agentName = agent.buildAgent().name();
        try {
            // Skip if agent is already paused
            if (agent.status() == BuildAgentStatus.PAUSED) {
                skippedAgents.add(agentName);
                return;
            }
            pauseBuildAgent(agentName);
            successfulAgents.add(agentName);
        } catch (Exception e) {
            failedAgents.add(agentName);
            log.error("Failed to pause agent {}: {}", agentName, e.getMessage());
        }
    });
    
    return new BuildAgentOperationResult(successfulAgents, failedAgents, skippedAgents);
}
📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 4eaba4e and daa17ad.

📒 Files selected for processing (9)
  • src/main/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/core/web/admin/AdminBuildJobQueueResource.java (3 hunks)
  • src/main/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/service/localci/SharedQueueManagementService.java (1 hunks)
  • src/main/webapp/app/localci/build-agents/build-agent-summary/build-agent-summary.component.html (2 hunks)
  • src/main/webapp/app/localci/build-agents/build-agent-summary/build-agent-summary.component.ts (4 hunks)
  • src/main/webapp/app/localci/build-agents/build-agents.service.ts (1 hunks)
  • src/main/webapp/i18n/de/buildAgents.json (1 hunks)
  • src/main/webapp/i18n/en/buildAgents.json (1 hunks)
  • src/test/javascript/spec/component/localci/build-agents/build-agent-summary.component.spec.ts (5 hunks)
  • src/test/javascript/spec/component/localci/build-agents/build-agents.service.spec.ts (3 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (8)
src/main/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/core/web/admin/AdminBuildJobQueueResource.java (1)

Pattern src/main/java/**/*.java: naming:CamelCase; principles:{single_responsibility,small_methods,no_duplication}; db:{perf_queries,datetime_not_timestamp}; rest:{stateless,singleton,delegate_logic,http_only,minimal_dtos}; dtos:{java_records,no_entities,min_data,single_resp}; di:constructor_injection; kiss:simple_code; file_handling:os_indep_paths; practices:{least_access,avoid_transactions,code_reuse,static_member_ref,prefer_primitives}; sql:{param_annotation,uppercase,avoid_subqueries};java:avoid_star_imports

src/main/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/service/localci/SharedQueueManagementService.java (1)

Pattern src/main/java/**/*.java: naming:CamelCase; principles:{single_responsibility,small_methods,no_duplication}; db:{perf_queries,datetime_not_timestamp}; rest:{stateless,singleton,delegate_logic,http_only,minimal_dtos}; dtos:{java_records,no_entities,min_data,single_resp}; di:constructor_injection; kiss:simple_code; file_handling:os_indep_paths; practices:{least_access,avoid_transactions,code_reuse,static_member_ref,prefer_primitives}; sql:{param_annotation,uppercase,avoid_subqueries};java:avoid_star_imports

src/main/webapp/app/localci/build-agents/build-agent-summary/build-agent-summary.component.html (1)

Pattern src/main/webapp/**/*.html: @if and @for are new and valid Angular syntax replacing *ngIf and *ngFor. They should always be used over the old style.

src/main/webapp/app/localci/build-agents/build-agent-summary/build-agent-summary.component.ts (1)

Pattern src/main/webapp/**/*.ts: angular_style:https://angular.io/guide/styleguide;methods_in_html:false;lazy_loading:true;code_reuse:true;tests:meaningful;types:PascalCase;enums:PascalCase;funcs:camelCase;props:camelCase;no_priv_prefix:true;strings:single_quotes;localize:true;btns:functionality;links:navigation;icons_text:newline;labels:associate;code_style:arrow_funcs,curly_braces,open_braces_same_line,indent_4;memory_leak_prevention:true;routes:naming_schema;chart_framework:ngx-charts;responsive_layout:true

src/main/webapp/app/localci/build-agents/build-agents.service.ts (1)

Pattern src/main/webapp/**/*.ts: angular_style:https://angular.io/guide/styleguide;methods_in_html:false;lazy_loading:true;code_reuse:true;tests:meaningful;types:PascalCase;enums:PascalCase;funcs:camelCase;props:camelCase;no_priv_prefix:true;strings:single_quotes;localize:true;btns:functionality;links:navigation;icons_text:newline;labels:associate;code_style:arrow_funcs,curly_braces,open_braces_same_line,indent_4;memory_leak_prevention:true;routes:naming_schema;chart_framework:ngx-charts;responsive_layout:true

src/main/webapp/i18n/de/buildAgents.json (1)

Pattern src/main/webapp/i18n/de/**/*.json: German language translations should be informal (dutzen) and should never be formal (sietzen). So the user should always be addressed with "du/dein" and never with "sie/ihr".

src/test/javascript/spec/component/localci/build-agents/build-agent-summary.component.spec.ts (1)

Pattern src/test/javascript/spec/**/*.ts: jest: true; mock: NgMocks; bad_practices: avoid_full_module_import; perf_improvements: mock_irrelevant_deps; service_testing: mock_http_for_logic; no_schema: avoid_NO_ERRORS_SCHEMA; expectation_specificity: true; solutions: {boolean: toBeTrue/False, reference: toBe, existence: toBeNull/NotNull, undefined: toBeUndefined, class_obj: toContainEntries/toEqual, spy_calls: {not_called: not.toHaveBeenCalled, once: toHaveBeenCalledOnce, with_value: toHaveBeenCalledWith|toHaveBeenCalledExactlyOnceWith}}

src/test/javascript/spec/component/localci/build-agents/build-agents.service.spec.ts (1)

Pattern src/test/javascript/spec/**/*.ts: jest: true; mock: NgMocks; bad_practices: avoid_full_module_import; perf_improvements: mock_irrelevant_deps; service_testing: mock_http_for_logic; no_schema: avoid_NO_ERRORS_SCHEMA; expectation_specificity: true; solutions: {boolean: toBeTrue/False, reference: toBe, existence: toBeNull/NotNull, undefined: toBeUndefined, class_obj: toContainEntries/toEqual, spy_calls: {not_called: not.toHaveBeenCalled, once: toHaveBeenCalledOnce, with_value: toHaveBeenCalledWith|toHaveBeenCalledExactlyOnceWith}}

🔇 Additional comments (12)
src/main/webapp/i18n/en/buildAgents.json (1)

23-24: LGTM! Error messages are clear and concise.

The simplified error messages maintain clarity while being more concise.

src/main/webapp/i18n/de/buildAgents.json (1)

25-27: LGTM! Alert messages are clear and consistent.

The new alert messages maintain consistency with existing messages and provide clear feedback about system operations.

src/main/webapp/app/localci/build-agents/build-agents.service.ts (1)

36-41: LGTM! Verify API endpoint changes across the system.

The endpoint URL updates for individual agent operations are implemented correctly with proper error handling and URL encoding.

Let's verify that all references to these endpoints have been updated consistently:

Also applies to: 59-64

✅ Verification successful

The endpoint changes are consistent across the codebase

Based on the search results, the endpoint URL changes from /agent/ to /agents/ are consistently implemented across the codebase:

  1. The new endpoint pattern /agents/ is used in all service calls:
    • Individual agent operations: /agents/${encodedAgentName}/pause, /agents/${encodedAgentName}/resume
    • Bulk operations: /agents/pause-all, /agents/resume-all
  2. The changes are also reflected in the corresponding test files
  3. No instances of the old endpoint pattern /agent/ were found
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for any remaining old endpoint patterns
rg -i "api/admin/agent/[^s]" --type ts

Length of output: 40


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a broader search to find all agent-related endpoints
rg -i "api/admin/agent" --type ts -A 2

Length of output: 38


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Also search for the new endpoint pattern to confirm the changes
rg -i "api/admin/agents/" --type ts -A 2

Length of output: 40


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's also check the Angular route configurations
fd -e ts -exec grep -l "agent" {} \; | xargs rg "path.*agent"

Length of output: 140352


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's search for the admin resource URL pattern in the codebase
rg -i "adminResourceUrl.*agent" --type ts

Length of output: 3643


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's also check the service class implementation
rg -i "class.*BuildAgentsService" --type ts -A 5

Length of output: 572

src/main/webapp/app/localci/build-agents/build-agent-summary/build-agent-summary.component.ts (2)

2-2: LGTM! Import changes and icon property modifications look good.

The changes follow Angular best practices:

  • Imports are organized properly
  • Icon properties are correctly scoped as protected for template usage

Also applies to: 6-6, 10-11, 28-30


68-70: Verify business logic for capacity calculation.

The updated calculation excludes PAUSED agents from the total build capacity. While this makes sense logically, please verify:

  1. Does this align with the monitoring requirements?
  2. Are there any dashboards or alerts that depend on this capacity number that need to be updated?

Let's check for any monitoring dependencies:

✅ Verification successful

Let me check the test cases to understand how this change is being validated.


Let me check if there are any monitoring or dashboard components that might be affected by this change.


Based on the gathered information, I can now provide the final response:

Build capacity calculation change is safe to proceed

The updated calculation to exclude PAUSED agents from capacity is well-tested and appears to be used only within the BuildAgentSummaryComponent for UI display purposes. The test cases verify both active and empty agent scenarios. No external monitoring or dashboard dependencies were found that could be impacted by this change.

  • The capacity is only used locally within the component for displaying the current build system status
  • Test coverage confirms the calculation works as expected for both active and inactive scenarios
  • No external monitoring systems or dashboards were found to depend on this metric
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for references to buildCapacity in the codebase
rg -A 3 "buildCapacity" --type ts

Length of output: 2226


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check the test file content to understand the test coverage for buildCapacity calculation
cat src/test/javascript/spec/component/localci/build-agents/build-agent-summary.component.spec.ts

Length of output: 10227


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for any monitoring or dashboard components that might use build agent data
rg -g "*.{ts,html}" "(monitoring|dashboard|metrics|capacity).*(build-agent|buildAgent)" -A 3

Length of output: 94

src/test/javascript/spec/component/localci/build-agents/build-agents.service.spec.ts (1)

137-137: LGTM: Consistent URL pattern updates

The endpoint URL updates from /agent/ to /agents/ are consistent across test cases and align with the service changes.

Also applies to: 145-145

src/main/webapp/app/localci/build-agents/build-agent-summary/build-agent-summary.component.html (1)

Line range hint 22-130: LGTM! Correctly uses new Angular control flow syntax.

The table implementation properly uses the new @if and @for directives as per coding guidelines, replacing the older *ngIf and *ngFor syntax.

src/test/javascript/spec/component/localci/build-agents/build-agent-summary.component.spec.ts (1)

141-142: LGTM! Alert service setup follows testing best practices

The AlertService setup uses MockProvider and properly initializes the spy for tracking alert calls.

Also applies to: 152-152, 158-159

src/main/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/core/web/admin/AdminBuildJobQueueResource.java (3)

Line range hint 236-254: Apply similar error handling improvements as pauseBuildAgent

Please apply the same error handling improvements suggested for the pauseBuildAgent method to this method as well.


256-273: Apply similar bulk operation status response as pauseAllBuildAgents

Please apply the same bulk operation status response improvements suggested for the pauseAllBuildAgents method to this method as well.


229-234: Verify service layer implementation

Let's verify that the SharedQueueManagementService properly implements the new methods.

Also applies to: 268-273

✅ Verification successful

Service layer implementation is properly integrated

The verification shows that the SharedQueueManagementService correctly implements the pauseAllBuildAgents() method at src/main/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/service/localci/SharedQueueManagementService.java. The implementation iterates through all build agents and pauses them individually using the pauseBuildAgent method. The service is properly integrated with the REST endpoint and the frontend components.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the implementation of new methods in SharedQueueManagementService

# Search for the implementation of new methods
ast-grep --pattern 'class SharedQueueManagementService {
  $$$
  public $_ pauseAllBuildAgents() {
    $$$
  }
  $$$
  public $_ resumeAllBuildAgents() {
    $$$
  }
  $$$
}'

Length of output: 300


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a different approach to find the service implementation
# First, let's find the LocalCIBuildJobQueueService implementation
rg -l "class LocalCIBuildJobQueueService" 

# Then search for pauseAllBuildAgents method implementation
rg "pauseAllBuildAgents" -A 5

Length of output: 8637

src/main/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/service/localci/SharedQueueManagementService.java (1)

157-167: Verify integration with build agent status updates

Let's verify that the bulk operations properly integrate with the build agent status tracking system.

✅ Verification successful

Build agent pause/resume operations are properly integrated with status tracking

The verification shows that the bulk operations are well-integrated with the build agent status system:

  • The BuildAgentStatus enum properly defines all states (ACTIVE, PAUSED, IDLE)
  • Status updates are correctly handled in SharedQueueProcessingService which updates agent status based on pause/resume operations
  • The pause/resume topics are properly initialized and consumed:
    • SharedQueueManagementService publishes to these topics
    • SharedQueueProcessingService listens and handles the messages appropriately
  • Integration tests verify the status transitions (IDLE -> PAUSED -> IDLE)
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for proper integration with build agent status tracking

# Check for BuildAgentStatus enum usage and status update handling
ast-grep --pattern 'enum BuildAgentStatus {
  $$$
}'

# Check for status update handling in agent management
rg -A 5 'BuildAgentStatus' 

# Check for proper event handling in build agent implementations
rg -A 5 'pauseBuildAgentTopic|resumeBuildAgentTopic'

Length of output: 19668

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/icl/LocalCIResourceIntegrationTest.java (2)

367-370: Enhance test coverage for individual agent pause/resume.

Consider adding the following test scenarios:

  1. Attempting to pause a non-existent agent
  2. Verifying that other agents remain unaffected
  3. Verifying the state transition behavior
 @Test
 @WithMockUser(username = TEST_PREFIX + "admin", roles = "ADMIN")
 void testPauseBuildAgent() throws Exception {
     // We need to clear the processing jobs to avoid the agent being set to ACTIVE again
     processingJobs.clear();
 
     request.put("/api/admin/agents/" + URLEncoder.encode(agent1.buildAgent().name(), StandardCharsets.UTF_8) + "/pause", null, HttpStatus.NO_CONTENT);
     await().until(() -> buildAgentInformation.get(agent1.buildAgent().memberAddress()).status() == BuildAgentInformation.BuildAgentStatus.PAUSED);
 
     request.put("/api/admin/agents/" + URLEncoder.encode(agent1.buildAgent().name(), StandardCharsets.UTF_8) + "/resume", null, HttpStatus.NO_CONTENT);
     await().until(() -> buildAgentInformation.get(agent1.buildAgent().memberAddress()).status() == BuildAgentInformation.BuildAgentStatus.IDLE);
+    
+    // Test non-existent agent
+    request.put("/api/admin/agents/non-existent-agent/pause", null, HttpStatus.NOT_FOUND);
+    
+    // Add another agent and verify it remains unaffected
+    var agent2 = new BuildAgentInformation(new BuildAgentDTO("agent2", "address2", "Agent 2"), 1, 0, 
+        new ArrayList<>(), BuildAgentInformation.BuildAgentStatus.IDLE, new ArrayList<>(), null);
+    buildAgentInformation.put("address2", agent2);
+    
+    request.put("/api/admin/agents/" + URLEncoder.encode(agent1.buildAgent().name(), StandardCharsets.UTF_8) + "/pause", null, HttpStatus.NO_CONTENT);
+    await().until(() -> buildAgentInformation.get(agent1.buildAgent().memberAddress()).status() == BuildAgentInformation.BuildAgentStatus.PAUSED);
+    assertThat(buildAgentInformation.get("address2").status()).isEqualTo(BuildAgentInformation.BuildAgentStatus.IDLE);
 }

Line range hint 1-391: Consider improving test class organization and documentation.

While the test implementation is solid, consider the following improvements:

  1. Add JavaDoc to document test scenarios and edge cases
  2. Extract test data setup into dedicated helper methods
  3. Add consistent assertion messages for better test failure diagnosis

Example improvements:

+/**
+ * Integration tests for build agent management functionality.
+ * Tests cover:
+ * - Individual agent pause/resume operations
+ * - Bulk agent operations
+ * - Error scenarios and edge cases
+ * - Concurrent operations
+ */
 class LocalCIResourceIntegrationTest extends AbstractProgrammingIntegrationLocalCILocalVCTestBase {
     // ... existing code ...
+    
+    /**
+     * Creates a test build agent with the given configuration.
+     * @param name Agent name
+     * @param address Member address
+     * @param status Initial status
+     * @return Configured BuildAgentInformation
+     */
+    private BuildAgentInformation createTestAgent(String name, String address, 
+            BuildAgentInformation.BuildAgentStatus status) {
+        return new BuildAgentInformation(
+            new BuildAgentDTO(name, address, name),
+            1, 0, new ArrayList<>(), status, new ArrayList<>(), null
+        );
+    }
📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between daa17ad and 19c5392.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/icl/LocalCIResourceIntegrationTest.java (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (1)
src/test/java/de/tum/cit/aet/artemis/programming/icl/LocalCIResourceIntegrationTest.java (1)

Pattern src/test/java/**/*.java: test_naming: descriptive; test_size: small_specific; fixed_data: true; junit5_features: true; assert_use: assertThat; assert_specificity: true; archunit_use: enforce_package_rules; db_query_count_tests: track_performance; util_service_factory_pattern: true; avoid_db_access: true; mock_strategy: static_mocks; context_restart_minimize: true

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
client Pull requests that update TypeScript code. (Added Automatically!) core Pull requests that affect the corresponding module programming Pull requests that affect the corresponding module server Pull requests that update Java code. (Added Automatically!) tests
Projects
Status: Ready For Review
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant