-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 295
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Lectures
: Disable submit button on invalid form and add tooltip
#9846
Open
laxerhd
wants to merge
8
commits into
ls1intum:develop
Choose a base branch
from
laxerhd:bugfix/lectures/disable-submit-button-on-invalid-form-add-tooltip
base: develop
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
+31
−10
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
8 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
8899075
Fixed condition for isFormValid
laxerhd 42ab4d0
Added varying tooltip to submit button
laxerhd b47f233
Refactor: Moved logic from html to ts component
laxerhd 2fdaaa6
Enable tooltip on whole button
laxerhd 5472b4b
Remove duplicate file to big message
laxerhd 8e3133e
Merge pull request #1 from laxerhd/bugfix/lectures/disable-submit-but…
laxerhd 8c9741c
Added combined error message to lectureUnit translation
laxerhd d3c7a32
Usage of strict equality for consistency in condition
laxerhd File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This approach will have a bad performance as the getter will be updated with each cycle - you can add a console.log in there to see that you will have thousands of logs just by moving your mouse within the view.
While working on another PR (#9655) I am introducing signals for the validation, you might want to stack this PR as you can then re-use the signals and instead of a getter use a computed property which is much more efficient regarding the performance.
(I will link the other PR once I have pushed the branch to remote and created it)Here is the PR with the signal changes, on which you might want to stack these changes Lectures: Improve and refactor lecture attachment validation #9893
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
You might also want to revise the client guidelines https://docs.artemis.cit.tum.de/dev/guidelines/client#null-and-undefined
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thank you so much for the detailed feedback! I really appreciate it.
I'll wait until your PR is merged and then revise the code here.
I will also make sure I follow the guidelines 👍
I guess
null
andundefined
might be mistakes often made by new contributors. Is there perhaps a Coderabbit policy that could be added so that it warns when used?