Skip to content

Conversation

artagnon
Copy link
Contributor

@artagnon artagnon commented Sep 29, 2025

Add a test with a non-uniform load of an argument (SCEVUnknown), showing that SCEVUnknown cannot always be considered uniform.

@llvmbot
Copy link
Member

llvmbot commented Sep 29, 2025

@llvm/pr-subscribers-llvm-transforms

Author: Ramkumar Ramachandra (artagnon)

Changes

Add a test with a maybe-uniform load of an argument (SCEVUnknown), showing that SCEVAddRecForUniformityRewriter bails out when it sees that the top-level select expression doesn't contain a UDivExpr.


Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/161219.diff

1 Files Affected:

  • (added) llvm/test/Transforms/LoopVectorize/uniformity-rewriter.ll (+76)
diff --git a/llvm/test/Transforms/LoopVectorize/uniformity-rewriter.ll b/llvm/test/Transforms/LoopVectorize/uniformity-rewriter.ll
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000..8f65b07c0797a
--- /dev/null
+++ b/llvm/test/Transforms/LoopVectorize/uniformity-rewriter.ll
@@ -0,0 +1,76 @@
+; NOTE: Assertions have been autogenerated by utils/update_test_checks.py UTC_ARGS: --check-globals none --version 6
+; RUN: opt -passes=loop-vectorize -force-vector-width=4 -S %s | FileCheck %s
+
+; Test to exercise the uniformity rewriter.
+
+define i32 @uniformityrew(ptr %src, i32 %x, i1 %c, i64 %n) {
+; CHECK-LABEL: define i32 @uniformityrew(
+; CHECK-SAME: ptr [[SRC:%.*]], i32 [[X:%.*]], i1 [[C:%.*]], i64 [[N:%.*]]) {
+; CHECK-NEXT:  [[ENTRY:.*]]:
+; CHECK-NEXT:    [[MIN_ITERS_CHECK:%.*]] = icmp ult i64 [[N]], 4
+; CHECK-NEXT:    br i1 [[MIN_ITERS_CHECK]], label %[[SCALAR_PH:.*]], label %[[VECTOR_PH:.*]]
+; CHECK:       [[VECTOR_PH]]:
+; CHECK-NEXT:    [[N_MOD_VF:%.*]] = urem i64 [[N]], 4
+; CHECK-NEXT:    [[N_VEC:%.*]] = sub i64 [[N]], [[N_MOD_VF]]
+; CHECK-NEXT:    [[BROADCAST_SPLATINSERT:%.*]] = insertelement <4 x i32> poison, i32 [[X]], i64 0
+; CHECK-NEXT:    [[BROADCAST_SPLAT:%.*]] = shufflevector <4 x i32> [[BROADCAST_SPLATINSERT]], <4 x i32> poison, <4 x i32> zeroinitializer
+; CHECK-NEXT:    [[TMP0:%.*]] = ashr <4 x i32> [[BROADCAST_SPLAT]], splat (i32 1)
+; CHECK-NEXT:    [[TMP6:%.*]] = and <4 x i32> [[TMP0]], splat (i32 1)
+; CHECK-NEXT:    [[TMP7:%.*]] = xor <4 x i32> [[TMP6]], splat (i32 1)
+; CHECK-NEXT:    [[TMP8:%.*]] = zext <4 x i32> [[TMP7]] to <4 x i64>
+; CHECK-NEXT:    [[TMP9:%.*]] = getelementptr i32, ptr [[SRC]], <4 x i64> [[TMP8]]
+; CHECK-NEXT:    br label %[[VECTOR_BODY:.*]]
+; CHECK:       [[VECTOR_BODY]]:
+; CHECK-NEXT:    [[INDEX:%.*]] = phi i64 [ 0, %[[VECTOR_PH]] ], [ [[INDEX_NEXT:%.*]], %[[VECTOR_BODY]] ]
+; CHECK-NEXT:    [[VEC_IND:%.*]] = phi <4 x i64> [ <i64 0, i64 1, i64 2, i64 3>, %[[VECTOR_PH]] ], [ [[VEC_IND_NEXT:%.*]], %[[VECTOR_BODY]] ]
+; CHECK-NEXT:    [[TMP10:%.*]] = getelementptr i32, ptr [[SRC]], <4 x i64> [[VEC_IND]]
+; CHECK-NEXT:    [[TMP11:%.*]] = select i1 [[C]], <4 x ptr> [[TMP9]], <4 x ptr> [[TMP10]]
+; CHECK-NEXT:    [[TMP12:%.*]] = extractelement <4 x ptr> [[TMP11]], i32 3
+; CHECK-NEXT:    [[TMP13:%.*]] = load i32, ptr [[TMP12]], align 4
+; CHECK-NEXT:    [[INDEX_NEXT]] = add nuw i64 [[INDEX]], 4
+; CHECK-NEXT:    [[VEC_IND_NEXT]] = add <4 x i64> [[VEC_IND]], splat (i64 4)
+; CHECK-NEXT:    [[TMP14:%.*]] = icmp eq i64 [[INDEX_NEXT]], [[N_VEC]]
+; CHECK-NEXT:    br i1 [[TMP14]], label %[[MIDDLE_BLOCK:.*]], label %[[VECTOR_BODY]], !llvm.loop [[LOOP0:![0-9]+]]
+; CHECK:       [[MIDDLE_BLOCK]]:
+; CHECK-NEXT:    [[CMP_N:%.*]] = icmp eq i64 [[N]], [[N_VEC]]
+; CHECK-NEXT:    br i1 [[CMP_N]], label %[[EXIT:.*]], label %[[SCALAR_PH]]
+; CHECK:       [[SCALAR_PH]]:
+; CHECK-NEXT:    [[BC_RESUME_VAL:%.*]] = phi i64 [ [[N_VEC]], %[[MIDDLE_BLOCK]] ], [ 0, %[[ENTRY]] ]
+; CHECK-NEXT:    br label %[[LOOP:.*]]
+; CHECK:       [[LOOP]]:
+; CHECK-NEXT:    [[IV:%.*]] = phi i64 [ [[BC_RESUME_VAL]], %[[SCALAR_PH]] ], [ [[IV_NEXT:%.*]], %[[LOOP]] ]
+; CHECK-NEXT:    [[ASHR_X:%.*]] = ashr i32 [[X]], 1
+; CHECK-NEXT:    [[AND:%.*]] = and i32 [[ASHR_X]], 1
+; CHECK-NEXT:    [[XOR:%.*]] = xor i32 [[AND]], 1
+; CHECK-NEXT:    [[IDX_EXT_1:%.*]] = zext i32 [[XOR]] to i64
+; CHECK-NEXT:    [[GEP_INVARIANT:%.*]] = getelementptr i32, ptr [[SRC]], i64 [[IDX_EXT_1]]
+; CHECK-NEXT:    [[GEP_IV:%.*]] = getelementptr i32, ptr [[SRC]], i64 [[IV]]
+; CHECK-NEXT:    [[SEL:%.*]] = select i1 [[C]], ptr [[GEP_INVARIANT]], ptr [[GEP_IV]]
+; CHECK-NEXT:    [[LD_SRC:%.*]] = load i32, ptr [[SEL]], align 4
+; CHECK-NEXT:    [[IV_NEXT]] = add i64 [[IV]], 1
+; CHECK-NEXT:    [[EXIT_COND:%.*]] = icmp eq i64 [[IV_NEXT]], [[N]]
+; CHECK-NEXT:    br i1 [[EXIT_COND]], label %[[EXIT]], label %[[LOOP]], !llvm.loop [[LOOP3:![0-9]+]]
+; CHECK:       [[EXIT]]:
+; CHECK-NEXT:    [[LD_SRC_LCSSA:%.*]] = phi i32 [ [[LD_SRC]], %[[LOOP]] ], [ [[TMP13]], %[[MIDDLE_BLOCK]] ]
+; CHECK-NEXT:    ret i32 [[LD_SRC_LCSSA]]
+;
+entry:
+  br label %loop
+
+loop:
+  %iv = phi i64 [ 0, %entry ], [ %iv.next, %loop ]
+  %ashr.x = ashr i32 %x, 1
+  %and = and i32 %ashr.x, 1
+  %xor = xor i32 %and, 1
+  %idx.ext.1 = zext i32 %xor to i64
+  %gep.invariant = getelementptr i32, ptr %src, i64 %idx.ext.1
+  %gep.iv = getelementptr i32, ptr %src, i64 %iv
+  %sel = select i1 %c, ptr %gep.invariant, ptr %gep.iv
+  %ld.src = load i32, ptr %sel, align 4
+  %iv.next = add i64 %iv, 1
+  %exit.cond = icmp eq i64 %iv.next, %n
+  br i1 %exit.cond, label %exit, label %loop
+
+exit:
+  ret i32 %ld.src
+}

@artagnon artagnon force-pushed the lv-uniformityrew-test branch 2 times, most recently from 8a62a50 to 64bf890 Compare October 2, 2025 11:05
@artagnon
Copy link
Contributor Author

artagnon commented Oct 6, 2025

Gentle ping.

Copy link
Contributor

@fhahn fhahn left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for adding the test. Could this be added to one if the existing uniform with div/Lahr tests as negative coverage?

Add a test with a maybe-uniform load of an argument (SCEVUnknown),
showing that SCEVAddRecForUniformityRewriter bails out when it sees that
the top-level select expression doesn't contain a UDivExpr.
@artagnon artagnon force-pushed the lv-uniformityrew-test branch from 64bf890 to a8ecec2 Compare October 6, 2025 09:50
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants