Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[mlir][tensor] Introduce
FoldTensorCastUnPackOp
#121393[mlir][tensor] Introduce
FoldTensorCastUnPackOp
#121393Changes from 1 commit
1bc2d8e
10d26d9
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
nit: Most of the logic in this function is the same as for tensor.pack, but with the source type instead of the dest type. Could you refactor the logic a bit to try to share code from a single function (mainly for finding the new mixed tile sizes)?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Great point, sending update shortly. Thanks for the suggestion!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
nit: Can you add a local variable (similar to what you did above with
shape
) for the second iterator's value (e.g., something liketile
)? I think it makes it more clear what the iterator is when reading the code.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Good point! And to keep things consistent, let me update
FoldTensorCastPackOp
as well.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
nit: Maybe use the same style as the test below for the attribute? (i.e.,
{test_attr}
instead of{some_attr}
)There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I've actually followed the test above
llvm-project/mlir/test/Dialect/Tensor/canonicalize.mlir
Lines 2791 to 2813 in 45e874e
😂 Let me unify this.