Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore: use treelad protocols instead vendor a protocols file #766

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Sep 26, 2024

Conversation

tsic404
Copy link
Contributor

@tsic404 tsic404 commented Sep 24, 2024

log: as title

@deepin-ci-robot
Copy link

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: tsic404

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@justforlxz
Copy link
Member

/help

Copy link

TAG Bot

TAG: 1.0.3
EXISTED: no
DISTRIBUTION: unstable

@justforlxz
Copy link
Member

/integr-toptic treeland-0.3

1 similar comment
@justforlxz
Copy link
Member

/integr-toptic treeland-0.3

@justforlxz
Copy link
Member

/integr-topic treeland-0.3

@Zeno-sole
Copy link

/topic treeland-0.3

@deepin-ci-robot
Copy link

Add topic: treeland-0.3 successed.

@deepin-ci-robot
Copy link

Integrated with pr deepin-community/Repository-Integration#1793

@tsic404
Copy link
Contributor Author

tsic404 commented Sep 26, 2024

/forcemerge

@deepin-ci-robot
Copy link

deepin pr auto review

Fix the renaming of the protocol extension

@deepin-bot
Copy link

deepin-bot bot commented Sep 26, 2024

This pr force merged! (status: blocked)

@deepin-bot deepin-bot bot merged commit cd2ded5 into linuxdeepin:release/beige Sep 26, 2024
6 of 11 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants