forked from liferay/liferay-portal
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1
LPD-24670 WIP. #5110
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Closed
Closed
LPD-24670 WIP. #5110
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
My first feeling about this was that it wasn't right, because API was intended to modify props of component implementing the item,
<ClayList.Item>
. It does make sense to shift target of customization to<ListItem>
, our own wrapper of the component. It makes customization of our implementation more flexible. But. it's a tradeoff. We lose future-proof aspect of the solution, where devs would automatically be able to modify future props of<ClayList.Item>
. It might make sense to add a prop specifically for that purpose. Something likethat ends up in
In general, mutating item is not good practice, but I think it's acceptable this close to leaf usage.
What do you think?
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Doing this shift makes item not mutated indeed.
Note how first commit does
item.foo = bar
whereas second one just provides a different item. So no internal FDS state is mutated.It's true that we are changing the item we pass to the child component. I believe there's a slight difference between this and mutating the item.
And yes, what you say makes sense to me, we need to open the possibility to drill down props in the "real" target component here. @chestofwonders pls add this to #5122 so that devs have access to the underlying
<ClayList.Item>
so that we get the best of both worldsThank you @markocikos !