docs: resolve release-plan formatting review notes

[lidge-jun]

Summary

• Fix the release-plan formatting comments from fix(responses): accept complete external task inputs without weakening tool guards #3743: heading spacing, inline replay-field identifiers and the audit amendment wording/references.
• Normalize the same heading pattern only in this release's two owned planning units. Runtime and test behavior are unchanged.
• Stack (merge bottom-up): fix(responses): accept complete external task inputs without weakening tool guards #3743 task-input compatibility and test(web-search): verify rotation deadline ownership deterministically #3752 deadline fixture → fix(kiro): coalesce adjacent outputs without losing tool identity #3750 Kiro output grouping → this documentation-only cleanup; prior layers are merged.

Verification

• Inspected the documentation-only diff and ran git diff --check successfully.
• No local runtime tests, typecheck or build were run; hosted documentation-scope CI34017523755 passed on 5bc38d5. Parent fix(kiro): coalesce adjacent outputs without losing tool identity #3750 passed full CI34017511752 and is merged.
• Recorded the C0 scope in 032_review_doc_format.md.

Checklist

• Scope stays focused and avoids unrelated cleanup.
• Docs or release notes were updated when needed.
• Security-sensitive changes were reviewed for secrets, auth, and unsafe defaults.

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Documentation
  • Improved readability across release and planning documentation with consistent spacing, clearer headings, corrected wording, and standardized references.
  • Added planning guidance covering external task-input handling, encrypted-task recovery, quota selection, dashboard alignment, and stateful conversation boundaries.
  • Clarified validation expectations, acceptance criteria, routing behavior, and recovery constraints without changing runtime behavior.

[github-actions]

✅ Deterministic PR hygiene checks passed.

[coderabbitai]

Caution

Review failed

The pull request is closed.

ℹ️ Recent review info

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml

Review profile: ASSERTIVE

Plan: Team

Run ID: a9c7111d-e449-48e7-bb43-f901760d6b81

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between c5ccd5d and 5bc38d5.

📒 Files selected for processing (13)

• devlog/_plan/260906_release_244_followups/000_plan.md
• devlog/_plan/260906_release_244_followups/010_policy.md
• devlog/_plan/260906_release_244_followups/020_task_input.md
• devlog/_plan/260906_release_244_followups/030_kiro_results.md
• devlog/_plan/260906_release_244_followups/032_review_doc_format.md
• devlog/_plan/260906_release_244_followups/040_opaque_recovery.md
• devlog/_plan/260906_release_244_followups/050_combo_recovery.md
• devlog/_plan/260906_release_244_followups/060_grok_terminal.md
• devlog/_plan/260906_release_244_followups/070_quota_proxy.md
• devlog/_plan/260906_release_244_followups/080_usage_source.md
• devlog/_plan/260906_release_244_followups/090_dashboard.md
• devlog/_plan/260906_release_244_followups/100_release.md
• devlog/_plan/260906_stateful_task_guidance/010_raw_boundary.md

---

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The pull request updates release planning documents. Most changes add Markdown spacing. One plan specifies external task-input routing and validation. Another plan records documentation corrections for PR review threads and stateful task guidance.

Changes

Release planning updates

Layer / File(s)	Summary
Release plan formatting devlog/_plan/260906_release_244_followups/000_plan.md, devlog/_plan/260906_release_244_followups/010_policy.md, devlog/_plan/260906_release_244_followups/030_kiro_results.md, devlog/_plan/260906_release_244_followups/040_opaque_recovery.md, devlog/_plan/260906_release_244_followups/050_combo_recovery.md, devlog/_plan/260906_release_244_followups/060_grok_terminal.md, devlog/_plan/260906_release_244_followups/070_quota_proxy.md, devlog/_plan/260906_release_244_followups/080_usage_source.md, devlog/_plan/260906_release_244_followups/090_dashboard.md, devlog/_plan/260906_release_244_followups/100_release.md	Existing plans receive blank-line spacing around headings and sections.
External task-input routing plan devlog/_plan/260906_release_244_followups/020_task_input.md	The plan defines strict external task-input recognition, content normalization, parser routing, preserved branches, and related tests.
Documentation follow-up corrections devlog/_plan/260906_release_244_followups/032_review_doc_format.md, devlog/_plan/260906_stateful_task_guidance/010_raw_boundary.md	The documents describe review-thread formatting work and correct heading and line-reference wording.

Estimated code review effort: 1 (Trivial) | ~5 minutes

Suggested reviewers: invalid-email-address

✨ Finishing Touches

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Create PR with unit tests
• Commit unit tests in branch codex/release-244-review-docs-07c0

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.}

[lidge-jun]

리뷰 · 우선순위 24 / 80

이 PR은 #3743 리뷰에서 나온 릴리스 플랜 문서 포맷만 고칩니다. 제목 뒤 빈 줄, 인라인 코드로 replay 필드 표시, audit 절 문구/참조 정리, 그리고 이 릴리스가 소유한 두 plan 유닛의 같은 heading 패턴 맞춤입니다. 런타임·테스트·릴리스 게이트 파일은 건드리지 않습니다. 베이스는 codex/release-244-kiro-results-07c0(#3750)이고, 머지 순서는 본문대로 #3743(이미 dev) → #3750 → 이 PR입니다. draft입니다.

변경 파일은 전부 devlog/_plan/ 아래입니다. 260906_release_244_followups/의 000·010·020·030·040…100에 heading 빈 줄을 넣고, 032_review_doc_format.md로 C0 범위를 기록하며, 260906_stateful_task_guidance/010_raw_boundary.md에서 “A audit amendment” → “An audit amendment”와 _replayPrefixLen / _continuationConversationMessageIndex 인라인 코드화·공백을 맞춥니다. git diff --check만 돌렸고 로컬 스위트는 없다고 합니다. #3750의 kiro 런타임 헤드를 흔들지 않으려는 스택 의도는 분명합니다.

우선순위 24인 이유다. 릴리스를 막는 결함이 아니고, opaque/combo/grok 등 다음 런타임 칸보다 가치가 낮습니다. #3750이 머지된 뒤 얹거나, 같은 스택에서 마지막에 squash해도 됩니다. 내용이 틀려 런타임을 깨는 형태도 아닙니다. types/config 대분할·중복 close와 무관합니다.

경로 - devlog/_plan/260906_release_244_followups/032_review_doc_format.md - C0 범위 기록(신규)
경로 - 동 디렉터리 000_plan.md … 100_release.md - heading 뒤 빈 줄 위주
경로 - devlog/_plan/260906_stateful_task_guidance/010_raw_boundary.md - audit 절 제목·인라인 코드·줄번호 공백
경로/심볼 - 런타임 src/ / tests/ - diff에 없음
경로/심볼 - 스택 부모 #3750 / 조부모 #3743(머지됨)

메인테이너의 판단이 필요한 지점

• #3750과 한 스택으로 같이 올릴지, kiro-results 머지 후 따로 짧게 머지할지
• plan 전 파일에 빈 줄을 넓힌 것이 리뷰 노이즈인지(범위는 이 릴리스 owned units로 제한됨)
• draft Ready 시점을 #3750 CI 이후로 고정할지

너의 추천
런타임 우선순위 낮음 — #3750 머지 후에야 얹으세요. 릴리스 블로커로 보지 마세요. 포맷만 맞으면 squash/빠른 머지 가능. close-as-duplicate 아님. 지금 트레인을 가로채지 마세요.

이 댓글은 grok-bot이 작성했습니다

[chatgpt-codex-connector]

Codex Review Summary

This comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.

Review	Status	Commit	Review trigger
📝 Code Review	✅ Completed 2026-09-06T07:02:09.043657Z	5bc38d5	Draft marked ready

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

• Open a pull request for review
• Mark a draft as ready
• Comment "@codex review" or "@codex security review".

Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings.