CI: add CodeQL static analyzer #1045
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
This pull request sets up GitHub code scanning for this repository. Once the scans have completed and the checks have passed, the analysis results for this pull request branch will appear on this overview. Once you merge this pull request, the 'Security' tab will show more code scanning analysis results (for example, for the default branch). Depending on your configuration and choice of analysis tool, future pull requests will be annotated with code scanning analysis results. For more information about GitHub code scanning, check out the documentation. |
|
I think I'm fine with this, particularly if we are already clean and it's not too chatty. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
We've added this guy recently in GDAL, PROJ and MapServer. I've given it a try in my rouault/geos fork and it found zero issues... ( https://github.com/rouault/geos/security/code-scanning?query=is%3Aopen+branch%3Aci_codeql+ ). Which is both a bit surprising (I had to fix hundreds in GDAL), and expected (GEOS shouldn't do anything dangerous).
Not sure how much appetite there is to add this here. Adding it will increase the GEOS score on https://securityscorecards.dev/viewer/?uri=github.com/libgeos/geos (SAST category)