Bump cairo-lang to 0.13.4a1

[JulianGCalderon]

Bump cairo-lang to 0.13.4a1

Also changes a hint, to match the changes in 0.13.4a1

[github-actions]

**Hyper Thereading Benchmark results**




hyperfine -r 2 -n "hyper_threading_main threads: 1" 'RAYON_NUM_THREADS=1 ./hyper_threading_main' -n "hyper_threading_pr threads: 1" 'RAYON_NUM_THREADS=1 ./hyper_threading_pr'
Benchmark 1: hyper_threading_main threads: 1
  Time (mean ± σ):     27.307 s ±  0.058 s    [User: 26.540 s, System: 0.764 s]
  Range (min … max):   27.266 s … 27.348 s    2 runs
 
Benchmark 2: hyper_threading_pr threads: 1
  Time (mean ± σ):     27.385 s ±  0.086 s    [User: 26.617 s, System: 0.766 s]
  Range (min … max):   27.324 s … 27.446 s    2 runs
 
Summary
  hyper_threading_main threads: 1 ran
    1.00 ± 0.00 times faster than hyper_threading_pr threads: 1




hyperfine -r 2 -n "hyper_threading_main threads: 2" 'RAYON_NUM_THREADS=2 ./hyper_threading_main' -n "hyper_threading_pr threads: 2" 'RAYON_NUM_THREADS=2 ./hyper_threading_pr'
Benchmark 1: hyper_threading_main threads: 2
  Time (mean ± σ):     15.203 s ±  0.036 s    [User: 26.737 s, System: 0.762 s]
  Range (min … max):   15.177 s … 15.228 s    2 runs
 
Benchmark 2: hyper_threading_pr threads: 2
  Time (mean ± σ):     15.163 s ±  0.004 s    [User: 26.648 s, System: 0.751 s]
  Range (min … max):   15.160 s … 15.165 s    2 runs
 
Summary
  hyper_threading_pr threads: 2 ran
    1.00 ± 0.00 times faster than hyper_threading_main threads: 2




hyperfine -r 2 -n "hyper_threading_main threads: 4" 'RAYON_NUM_THREADS=4 ./hyper_threading_main' -n "hyper_threading_pr threads: 4" 'RAYON_NUM_THREADS=4 ./hyper_threading_pr'
Benchmark 1: hyper_threading_main threads: 4
  Time (mean ± σ):     11.404 s ±  0.113 s    [User: 39.375 s, System: 0.917 s]
  Range (min … max):   11.324 s … 11.484 s    2 runs
 
Benchmark 2: hyper_threading_pr threads: 4
  Time (mean ± σ):     11.123 s ±  0.463 s    [User: 39.729 s, System: 0.909 s]
  Range (min … max):   10.796 s … 11.450 s    2 runs
 
Summary
  hyper_threading_pr threads: 4 ran
    1.03 ± 0.04 times faster than hyper_threading_main threads: 4




hyperfine -r 2 -n "hyper_threading_main threads: 6" 'RAYON_NUM_THREADS=6 ./hyper_threading_main' -n "hyper_threading_pr threads: 6" 'RAYON_NUM_THREADS=6 ./hyper_threading_pr'
Benchmark 1: hyper_threading_main threads: 6
  Time (mean ± σ):     10.943 s ±  0.036 s    [User: 39.359 s, System: 0.944 s]
  Range (min … max):   10.918 s … 10.969 s    2 runs
 
Benchmark 2: hyper_threading_pr threads: 6
  Time (mean ± σ):     10.868 s ±  0.026 s    [User: 40.315 s, System: 0.954 s]
  Range (min … max):   10.849 s … 10.886 s    2 runs
 
Summary
  hyper_threading_pr threads: 6 ran
    1.01 ± 0.00 times faster than hyper_threading_main threads: 6




hyperfine -r 2 -n "hyper_threading_main threads: 8" 'RAYON_NUM_THREADS=8 ./hyper_threading_main' -n "hyper_threading_pr threads: 8" 'RAYON_NUM_THREADS=8 ./hyper_threading_pr'
Benchmark 1: hyper_threading_main threads: 8
  Time (mean ± σ):     10.837 s ±  0.175 s    [User: 40.261 s, System: 0.924 s]
  Range (min … max):   10.713 s … 10.961 s    2 runs
 
Benchmark 2: hyper_threading_pr threads: 8
  Time (mean ± σ):     10.791 s ±  0.007 s    [User: 40.303 s, System: 0.937 s]
  Range (min … max):   10.786 s … 10.796 s    2 runs
 
Summary
  hyper_threading_pr threads: 8 ran
    1.00 ± 0.02 times faster than hyper_threading_main threads: 8




hyperfine -r 2 -n "hyper_threading_main threads: 16" 'RAYON_NUM_THREADS=16 ./hyper_threading_main' -n "hyper_threading_pr threads: 16" 'RAYON_NUM_THREADS=16 ./hyper_threading_pr'
Benchmark 1: hyper_threading_main threads: 16
  Time (mean ± σ):     10.779 s ±  0.188 s    [User: 40.483 s, System: 1.022 s]
  Range (min … max):   10.647 s … 10.912 s    2 runs
 
Benchmark 2: hyper_threading_pr threads: 16
  Time (mean ± σ):     10.877 s ±  0.219 s    [User: 40.668 s, System: 1.014 s]
  Range (min … max):   10.721 s … 11.032 s    2 runs
 
Summary
  hyper_threading_main threads: 16 ran
    1.01 ± 0.03 times faster than hyper_threading_pr threads: 16

[github-actions]

Benchmark Results for modified programs 🚀

Command	Mean [s]	Min [s]	Max [s]	Relative
head big_factorial	2.242 ± 0.036	2.208	2.322	1.00

Command	Mean [s]	Min [s]	Max [s]	Relative
head big_fibonacci	2.197 ± 0.020	2.179	2.243	1.00

Command	Mean [s]	Min [s]	Max [s]	Relative
head blake2s_integration_benchmark	8.298 ± 0.076	8.166	8.377	1.00

Command	Mean [s]	Min [s]	Max [s]	Relative
head compare_arrays_200000	2.347 ± 0.039	2.301	2.432	1.00

Command	Mean [s]	Min [s]	Max [s]	Relative
head dict_integration_benchmark	1.517 ± 0.014	1.502	1.553	1.00

Command	Mean [s]	Min [s]	Max [s]	Relative
head field_arithmetic_get_square_benchmark	1.304 ± 0.012	1.282	1.331	1.00

Command	Mean [s]	Min [s]	Max [s]	Relative
head integration_builtins	8.337 ± 0.083	8.204	8.502	1.00

Command	Mean [s]	Min [s]	Max [s]	Relative
head keccak_integration_benchmark	8.628 ± 0.063	8.458	8.669	1.00

Command	Mean [s]	Min [s]	Max [s]	Relative
head linear_search	2.338 ± 0.026	2.307	2.398	1.00

Command	Mean [s]	Min [s]	Max [s]	Relative
head math_cmp_and_pow_integration_benchmark	1.619 ± 0.021	1.593	1.659	1.00

Command	Mean [s]	Min [s]	Max [s]	Relative
head math_integration_benchmark	1.557 ± 0.013	1.539	1.578	1.00

Command	Mean [s]	Min [s]	Max [s]	Relative
head memory_integration_benchmark	1.295 ± 0.010	1.282	1.316	1.00

Command	Mean [s]	Min [s]	Max [s]	Relative
head operations_with_data_structures_benchmarks	1.668 ± 0.008	1.655	1.685	1.00

Command	Mean [ms]	Min [ms]	Max [ms]	Relative
head pedersen	550.3 ± 2.0	547.3	553.6	1.00

Command	Mean [ms]	Min [ms]	Max [ms]	Relative
head poseidon_integration_benchmark	655.8 ± 6.2	646.6	666.1	1.00

Command	Mean [s]	Min [s]	Max [s]	Relative
head secp_integration_benchmark	1.928 ± 0.020	1.900	1.973	1.00

Command	Mean [ms]	Min [ms]	Max [ms]	Relative
head set_integration_benchmark	650.9 ± 4.9	644.8	660.3	1.00

Command	Mean [s]	Min [s]	Max [s]	Relative
head uint256_integration_benchmark	4.552 ± 0.027	4.511	4.596	1.00

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 11.76471% with 15 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 96.36%. Comparing base (7a97bed) to head (da3073d).

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
...int_processor/builtin_hint_processor_definition.rs	11.76%	15 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #1959      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   96.39%   96.36%   -0.04%     
==========================================
  Files         102      102              
  Lines       41566    41583      +17     
==========================================
+ Hits        40068    40070       +2     
- Misses       1498     1513      +15     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.