Introduce basic Verilator support #48
Draft
+111
−0
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment was marked as outdated.
This comment was marked as outdated.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Running on Verilator may or may not give tenyr an obvous immediate advantage, but given how quickly its generated C++ code can run, it may be a reasonable way to introduce a cycle-accurate simulator alternative to the (time-agnostic) functional simulator that is
tsim.The current pull request will introduce basic "Verilated" functionality only.
Demo (stops correctly after executing ~112469 cycles).
make -C ex qsort_demo.memh cp ex/qsort_demo.memh hw/verilator/default.memh cd hw/verilator make ./Vtop