Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix panic #271

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 17, 2024
Merged

fix panic #271

merged 1 commit into from
Apr 17, 2024

Conversation

dwertent
Copy link

@dwertent dwertent commented Apr 17, 2024

User description

Overview


Type

bug_fix


Description

  • Resolved a panic issue in the application profile cache by modifying the iteration method over the container map.
  • Updated the iteration to use ToSlice() for safer access and to handle potentially nil or empty collections.

Changes walkthrough

Relevant files
Bug fix
applicationprofilecache.go
Fix Panic by Safe Iteration Over Container Map                     

pkg/objectcache/applicationprofilecache/applicationprofilecache.go

  • Fixed a panic issue by changing iteration over a container map to use
    ToSlice() method.
  • Ensured safe iteration over potentially nil or empty collections.
  • +1/-1     

    PR-Agent usage:
    Comment /help on the PR to get a list of all available PR-Agent tools and their descriptions

    Copy link

    PR Description updated to latest commit (592797e)

    Copy link

    PR Review

    ⏱️ Estimated effort to review [1-5]

    2, because the changes are minimal and localized to a specific functionality, but understanding the context of the change requires some domain knowledge about the application profile cache.

    🧪 Relevant tests

    No

    🔍 Possible issues

    Possible Bug: If the method ToSlice() does not handle nil or empty collections as expected, it might still lead to a panic or unwanted behavior. It's crucial to ensure that ToSlice() is robust against such cases.

    🔒 Security concerns

    No


    ✨ Review tool usage guide:

    Overview:
    The review tool scans the PR code changes, and generates a PR review which includes several types of feedbacks, such as possible PR issues, security threats and relevant test in the PR. More feedbacks can be added by configuring the tool.

    The tool can be triggered automatically every time a new PR is opened, or can be invoked manually by commenting on any PR.

    • When commenting, to edit configurations related to the review tool (pr_reviewer section), use the following template:
    /review --pr_reviewer.some_config1=... --pr_reviewer.some_config2=...
    
    [pr_reviewer]
    some_config1=...
    some_config2=...
    

    See the review usage page for a comprehensive guide on using this tool.

    Copy link

    PR Code Suggestions

    CategorySuggestions                                                                                                                                                       
    Possible issue
    Add a nil check to prevent potential runtime panics.

    Ensure that the Get method call on ap.slugToContainers does not return nil before
    attempting to call ToSlice() on it. This will prevent potential runtime panics due to
    dereferencing a nil pointer.

    pkg/objectcache/applicationprofilecache/applicationprofilecache.go [257-259]

    -for _, i := range ap.slugToContainers.Get(apName).ToSlice() {
    -  ap.containerToSlug.Set(i, apName)
    +containers := ap.slugToContainers.Get(apName)
    +if containers != nil {
    +  for _, i := range containers.ToSlice() {
    +    ap.containerToSlug.Set(i, apName)
    +  }
     }
     

    ✨ Improve tool usage guide:

    Overview:
    The improve tool scans the PR code changes, and automatically generates suggestions for improving the PR code. The tool can be triggered automatically every time a new PR is opened, or can be invoked manually by commenting on a PR.

    • When commenting, to edit configurations related to the improve tool (pr_code_suggestions section), use the following template:
    /improve --pr_code_suggestions.some_config1=... --pr_code_suggestions.some_config2=...
    
    [pr_code_suggestions]
    some_config1=...
    some_config2=...
    

    See the improve usage page for a comprehensive guide on using this tool.

    Copy link

    ✨ Artifacts are available here.

    3 similar comments
    Copy link

    ✨ Artifacts are available here.

    Copy link

    ✨ Artifacts are available here.

    Copy link

    ✨ Artifacts are available here.

    Copy link

    Summary:

    • License scan: failure
    • Credentials scan: failure
    • Vulnerabilities scan: success
    • Unit test: success
    • Go linting: success

    Copy link

    ✨ Artifacts are available here.

    2 similar comments
    Copy link

    ✨ Artifacts are available here.

    Copy link

    ✨ Artifacts are available here.

    @amirmalka amirmalka merged commit fd36954 into main Apr 17, 2024
    14 of 18 checks passed
    @matthyx matthyx deleted the fix/panic branch September 17, 2024 09:08
    Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
    Projects
    None yet
    Development

    Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

    2 participants