Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

make GetUnusedPort concurrency safe #1216

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

muff1nman
Copy link
Contributor

What type of PR is this?

/kind bug

What this PR does / why we need it:

Kwok can be used nicely in go test with parallelism. However when running with -race, GetUnusedPort is flagged as a data race. Ancedotally, during our tests we have seen port contention and this might help resolve that.

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:

Special notes for your reviewer:

Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?

NONE

Additional documentation e.g., KEPs (Kubernetes Enhancement Proposals), usage docs, etc.:


Kwok can be used nicely in go test with parallelism. However when
running with -race, GetUnusedPort is flagged as a data race.
Ancedotally, during our tests we have seen port contention and this
might help resolve that.

Signed-off-by: Andrew DeMaria <[email protected]>
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesn't merit a release note. kind/bug Categorizes issue or PR as related to a bug. labels Sep 5, 2024
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: muff1nman
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please assign huang-wei for approval. For more information see the Kubernetes Code Review Process.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. label Sep 5, 2024
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. label Sep 5, 2024
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @muff1nman. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a kubernetes-sigs member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work. Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. label Sep 5, 2024
Copy link

netlify bot commented Sep 5, 2024

Deploy Preview for k8s-kwok canceled.

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit 763aec1
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/sites/k8s-kwok/deploys/66d9eec777ef4600085fdf7b

@wzshiming
Copy link
Member

/ok-to-test

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added ok-to-test Indicates a non-member PR verified by an org member that is safe to test. and removed needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. labels Sep 6, 2024
@wzshiming
Copy link
Member

this function should never be used concurrently.

@muff1nman
Copy link
Contributor Author

@wzshiming are you saying that I shouldn't be using kwok with https://pkg.go.dev/testing#T.Parallel? I'd find that surprising considering how easy it is to use kwok in testing and with parallelism it makes the tests run very quickly.

@muff1nman
Copy link
Contributor Author

Actually I think there is more than just GetUnusedPorts that potentially is a problem.

@wzshiming
Copy link
Member

Actually I think there is more than just GetUnusedPorts that potentially is a problem.

Yes, I know the kwokctl potentially has this problem, but there's no need for parallelism, right?

@muff1nman
Copy link
Contributor Author

The difference with t.Parallel is 3.5 minutes vs 23 minutes test runtime. So I'd say its very nice to have.

@wzshiming
Copy link
Member

Hello

I would like to verify what you said, and I have not found any way to do it in this codebase, how do you do it exactly, I would like to verify it.

@muff1nman
Copy link
Contributor Author

I would like to verify what you said

Verify which part exactly?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. kind/bug Categorizes issue or PR as related to a bug. ok-to-test Indicates a non-member PR verified by an org member that is safe to test. release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesn't merit a release note. size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants