Add Test Cases for slices package

[joeyyy09]

What type of PR is this?

/kind test

What this PR does / why we need it:

Adds comprehensive test cases for the slices package to ensure thorough coverage and functionality.

Special notes for your reviewer:

N/A

Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?

No.

Additional documentation e.g., KEPs (Kubernetes Enhancement Proposals), usage docs, etc.:

NONE

[k8s-ci-robot]

@joeyyy09: The label(s) kind/test cannot be applied, because the repository doesn't have them.

In response to this:

What type of PR is this?

/kind test

What this PR does / why we need it:

Adds comprehensive test cases for the slices package to ensure thorough coverage and functionality.

Special notes for your reviewer:

N/A

Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?

No.

Additional documentation e.g., KEPs (Kubernetes Enhancement Proposals), usage docs, etc.:

NONE

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

[linux-foundation-easycla]

The committers listed above are authorized under a signed CLA.

• ✅ login: joeyyy09 / name: Harshith Mente (d5984c8, 8ee8fad, 270971e)

[k8s-ci-robot]

Welcome @joeyyy09!

It looks like this is your first PR to kubernetes-sigs/kwok 🎉. Please refer to our pull request process documentation to help your PR have a smooth ride to approval.

You will be prompted by a bot to use commands during the review process. Do not be afraid to follow the prompts! It is okay to experiment. Here is the bot commands documentation.

You can also check if kubernetes-sigs/kwok has its own contribution guidelines.

You may want to refer to our testing guide if you run into trouble with your tests not passing.

If you are having difficulty getting your pull request seen, please follow the recommended escalation practices. Also, for tips and tricks in the contribution process you may want to read the Kubernetes contributor cheat sheet. We want to make sure your contribution gets all the attention it needs!

Thank you, and welcome to Kubernetes. 😃

[k8s-ci-robot]

Hi @joeyyy09. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a kubernetes-sigs member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work. Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

[netlify]

✅ Deploy Preview for k8s-kwok canceled.

Name	Link
🔨 Latest commit	d5984c8
🔍 Latest deploy log	https://app.netlify.com/sites/k8s-kwok/deploys/6646eea591a33800080137ce

[joeyyy09]

I updated the interface settings from args[S interface{ ~[]T }, T comparable] struct { to testCase[S ~[]T, T comparable] struct { for clarity and consistency. This change simplifies the interface definition while still ensuring that the types remain compatible with the requirements of the test cases. By using testCase instead of args, it more accurately reflects the purpose of the struct in the context of our test cases.

[joeyyy09]

I modified the error handling logic to combine the error check with the condition for os.IsNotExist(err). This change simplifies the control flow by reducing nesting and makes the code easier to read. Now, if the error is not nil and not related to file not found (os.IsNotExist), we handle it accordingly. This refactor helped fix the linting issues i was facing

[wzshiming]

/ok-to-test

[wzshiming]

I modified the error handling logic to combine the error check with the condition for os.IsNotExist(err). This change simplifies the control flow by reducing nesting and makes the code easier to read. Now, if the error is not nil and not related to file not found (os.IsNotExist), we handle it accordingly. This refactor helped fix the linting issues i was facing

It breaks the original logic, and I'm not sure the unit test covered this change.

[wzshiming]

The test is look good, then revert content that is not in the title.

[joeyyy09]

The test is look good, then revert content that is not in the title.

Yeah, i've reverted back the changes

[wzshiming]

/approve
/lgtm
/release-note-none
/label tide/merge-method-squash

[k8s-ci-robot]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: joeyyy09, wzshiming

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• OWNERS [wzshiming]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment