Pluggable bbr framework initial PR

[davidbreitgand]

/kind feature

What this PR does / why we need it:

Allows custom extensions to BBR functionality.

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:
Fixes #1963

Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?:

-->

NONE

[netlify]

✅ Deploy Preview for gateway-api-inference-extension ready!

Name	Link
🔨 Latest commit	d31775f
🔍 Latest deploy log	https://app.netlify.com/projects/gateway-api-inference-extension/deploys/693b246265861e0007d02974
😎 Deploy Preview	https://deploy-preview-1981--gateway-api-inference-extension.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile	Toggle QR Code... Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

---

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify project configuration.

[k8s-ci-robot]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: davidbreitgand
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please assign nirrozenbaum for approval. For more information see the Code Review Process.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• OWNERS

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

[k8s-ci-robot]

Hi @davidbreitgand. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a github.com member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work. Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

[davidbreitgand]

@elevran could you please also review this?
@srampal please review