Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat(Azure DNS): add NS record support #4846

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

abaguas
Copy link
Contributor

@abaguas abaguas commented Nov 4, 2024

Description

Azure supports NS records on public DNS zones: https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/rest/api/dns/record-sets/create-or-update?view=rest-dns-2018-05-01&tabs=HTTP#create-ns-recordset This PR adds this support to external dns. The implementation is similar to the other records.

Besides the unit tests this PR was also tested by creating a DNSEndpoint with the following spec:

    endpoints:
    - dnsName: cloud.k8gb.io
      recordTTL: 5
      recordType: NS
      targets:
      - gslb-ns-eu-cloud.k8gb.io
      - gslb-ns-us-cloud.k8gb.io

The creation of the NS record in Azure was successful:

az network dns record-set ns list --resource-group rg-k8gb  --zone-name "$EDGE_DNS_ZONE" --output json
[
  {...},
  {
    "NSRecords": [
      {
        "nsdname": "gslb-ns-eu-cloud.k8gb.io"
      },
      {
        "nsdname": "gslb-ns-us-cloud.k8gb.io"
      }
    ],
    "TTL": 5,
    "etag": "97a7199f-3be9-47bd-ab00-37013b775180",
    "fqdn": "cloud.k8gb.io.",
    "id": "/subscriptions/<redacted>/resourceGroups/rg-k8gb/providers/Microsoft.Network/dnszones/k8gb.io/NS/cloud",
    "name": "cloud",
    "provisioningState": "Succeeded",
    "resourceGroup": "rg-k8gb",
    "targetResource": {},
    "trafficManagementProfile": {},
    "type": "Microsoft.Network/dnszones/NS"
  }
]

Fixes #2835. This change was already attempted in #2835, but it was never merged due to inactivity.

Checklist

  • Unit tests updated
  • End user documentation updated

Azure supports NS records on public DNS zones: https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/rest/api/dns/record-sets/create-or-update?view=rest-dns-2018-05-01&tabs=HTTP#create-ns-recordset
This PR adds this support to external dns. The implementation is similar to the other records.

Besides the unit tests this PR was also tested by creating a DNSEndpoint with the following spec:
```
    endpoints:
    - dnsName: cloud.k8gb.io
      recordTTL: 5
      recordType: NS
      targets:
      - gslb-ns-eu-cloud.k8gb.io
      - gslb-ns-us-cloud.k8gb.io
```
The creation of the NS record in Azure was successful:
```
az network dns record-set ns list --resource-group rg-k8gb  --zone-name "$EDGE_DNS_ZONE" --output json
[
  {...},
  {
    "NSRecords": [
      {
        "nsdname": "gslb-ns-eu-cloud.k8gb.io"
      },
      {
        "nsdname": "gslb-ns-us-cloud.k8gb.io"
      }
    ],
    "TTL": 5,
    "etag": "97a7199f-3be9-47bd-ab00-37013b775180",
    "fqdn": "cloud.k8gb.io.",
    "id": "/subscriptions/<redacted>/resourceGroups/rg-k8gb/providers/Microsoft.Network/dnszones/k8gb.io/NS/cloud",
    "name": "cloud",
    "provisioningState": "Succeeded",
    "resourceGroup": "rg-k8gb",
    "targetResource": {},
    "trafficManagementProfile": {},
    "type": "Microsoft.Network/dnszones/NS"
  }
]
```

This change was already attempted in kubernetes-sigs#2835, but it was never merged due to inactivity.

Signed-off-by: Andre Aguas <[email protected]>
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. label Nov 4, 2024
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by:
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please assign raffo for approval. For more information see the Kubernetes Code Review Process.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Welcome @abaguas!

It looks like this is your first PR to kubernetes-sigs/external-dns 🎉. Please refer to our pull request process documentation to help your PR have a smooth ride to approval.

You will be prompted by a bot to use commands during the review process. Do not be afraid to follow the prompts! It is okay to experiment. Here is the bot commands documentation.

You can also check if kubernetes-sigs/external-dns has its own contribution guidelines.

You may want to refer to our testing guide if you run into trouble with your tests not passing.

If you are having difficulty getting your pull request seen, please follow the recommended escalation practices. Also, for tips and tricks in the contribution process you may want to read the Kubernetes contributor cheat sheet. We want to make sure your contribution gets all the attention it needs!

Thank you, and welcome to Kubernetes. 😃

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @abaguas. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a kubernetes-sigs member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work. Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Nov 4, 2024

testAzureApplyChangesInternal(t, true, &recordsClient)
testAzurePrivateDNSApplyChangesInternal(t, true, &recordsClient)
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

While implementing my change I noticed the private zone tests were using an AzureProvider instead of a AzurePrivateDNSProvider

@mloiseleur
Copy link
Contributor

/ok-to-test
/retitle feat(Azure DNS): add NS record support

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the ok-to-test Indicates a non-member PR verified by an org member that is safe to test. label Nov 14, 2024
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot changed the title Add NS record support for Azure DNS feat(Azure DNS): add NS record support Nov 14, 2024
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. label Nov 14, 2024
@mloiseleur
Copy link
Contributor

/lgtm

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Nov 14, 2024
@mloiseleur
Copy link
Contributor

/assign @Raffo

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. ok-to-test Indicates a non-member PR verified by an org member that is safe to test. size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants