-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.6k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
fix(aws): add soft error #4741
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
fix(aws): add soft error #4741
Conversation
Welcome @blanchardma! |
Hi @blanchardma. Thanks for your PR. I'm waiting for a kubernetes-sigs member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the I understand the commands that are listed here. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
@blanchardma thanks for this. Would you please update the tests accordingly ? |
@mloiseleur can you be a bit more specific? Because the other PR #3973 in this direction don't have any and also the one that introduced the softerror #4166. |
/ok-to-test |
/approve |
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: szuecs The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
For example #4682 |
@blanchardma #4741 (comment) can you check that? |
This comment was marked as off-topic.
This comment was marked as off-topic.
@mloiseleur: The label(s) In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
This comment was marked as off-topic.
This comment was marked as off-topic.
@mloiseleur: The label(s) In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
This comment was marked as off-topic.
This comment was marked as off-topic.
@mloiseleur: The label(s) In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
I tried to add some labels on this PR, without any success 😅 . |
Description
Fixes (again) #4067 because it was partly revert by #3973.
Add the ability to have a soft error when it fails to list resource records sets for zone. For example, if the cause of the error is the throttling of the AWS Route53 API
Throttling: Rate exceeded' status code: 400
, it is certainly not helpful if it is not a soft error and flags to improve the situation such as--min-event-sync-interval
can not work.Checklist
-> Both are not needed