chore(deps): update module github.com/spf13/pflag to v1.0.10

[red-hat-konflux]

This PR contains the following updates:

Package	Change	Age	Confidence
github.com/spf13/pflag	v1.0.7 -> v1.0.10
github.com/spf13/pflag	v1.0.6 -> v1.0.10

---

Warning

Some dependencies could not be looked up. Check the warning logs for more information.

---

Release Notes

spf13/pflag (github.com/spf13/pflag)

v1.0.10

Compare Source

What's Changed

• fix deprecation comment for (FlagSet.)ParseErrorsWhitelist by @​thaJeztah in #​447
• remove uses of errors.Is, which requires go1.13, move go1.16/go1.21 tests to separate file by @​thaJeztah in #​448

New Contributors

• @​thaJeztah made their first contribution in #​447

Full Changelog: spf13/pflag@v1.0.9...v1.0.10

v1.0.9

Compare Source

What's Changed

• fix: Restore ParseErrorsWhitelist name for now by @​tomasaschan in #​446

Full Changelog: spf13/pflag@v1.0.8...v1.0.9

v1.0.8

Compare Source

⚠️ Breaking Change

This version, while only a patch bump, includes a (very minor) breaking change: the flag.ParseErrorsWhitelist struct and corresponding FlagSet.parseErrorsWhitelist field have been renamed to ParseErrorsAllowlist.

This should result in compilation errors in any code that uses these fields, which can be fixed by adjusting the names at call sites. There is no change in semantics or behavior of the struct or field referred to by these names. If your code compiles without errors after bumping to/past v1.0.8, you are not affected by this change.

The breaking change was reverted in v1.0.9, by means of re-introducing the old names with deprecation warnings. The plan is still to remove them in a future release, so if your code does depend on the old names, please change them to use the new names at your earliest convenience.

What's Changed

• Remove Redundant "Unknown-Flag" Error by @​vaguecoder in #​364
• Switching from whitelist to Allowlist terminology by @​dubrie in #​261
• Omit zero time.Time default from usage line by @​mologie in #​438
• implement CopyToGoFlagSet by @​pohly in #​330
• flag: Emulate stdlib behavior and do not print ErrHelp by @​tmc in #​407
• Print Default Values of String-to-String in Sorted Order by @​vaguecoder in #​365
• fix: Don't print ErrHelp in ParseAll by @​tomasaschan in #​443
• Reset args on re-parse even if empty by @​tomasaschan in #​444

New Contributors

• @​vaguecoder made their first contribution in #​364
• @​dubrie made their first contribution in #​261
• @​mologie made their first contribution in #​438
• @​pohly made their first contribution in #​330
• @​tmc made their first contribution in #​407
• @​tomasaschan made their first contribution in #​443

Full Changelog: spf13/pflag@v1.0.7...v1.0.8

---

Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - At any time (no schedule defined), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.

♻ Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about these updates again.

---

• If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

---

To execute skipped test pipelines write comment /ok-to-test.

---

Documentation

Find out how to configure dependency updates in MintMaker documentation or see all available configuration options in Renovate documentation.

[snyk-io]

⛔ Snyk checks have failed. 1 issues have been found so far.

Status	Scanner	Critical	High	Medium	Low	Total (1)
⛔	Open Source Security	0	1	0	0	1 issues
✅	Licenses	0	0	0	0	0 issues
✅	Code Security	0	0	0	0	0 issues

💻 Catch issues earlier using the plugins for VS Code, JetBrains IDEs, Visual Studio, and Eclipse.

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
⚠️ Please upload report for BASE (main@2fa9165). Learn more about missing BASE report.

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #637   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage        ?   48.41%           
=======================================
  Files           ?       20           
  Lines           ?     2650           
  Branches        ?        0           
=======================================
  Hits            ?     1283           
  Misses          ?     1239           
  Partials        ?      128           

Flag	Coverage Δ
unit-tests	48.41% <ø> (?)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.