Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Use eventset in roctxconnector (as in nvtxconnector) #219
Use eventset in roctxconnector (as in nvtxconnector) #219
Changes from 1 commit
c390533
194a1fd
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Why did you change?
I can see how the linking would need some symbols to be private but not why the include directories would be needed downstream.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
These are leftovers from when I was trying to make the
roctx-connector
work withrocprof
. I've reverted the change.In fact, in my first tries, I used
rocprof
as follows:That didn't work, in the sense that even though this command asks
rocprof
to use--roctx-trace
,rocprof
didn't include the markers in theresults.json
trace. I suspect that the reason may be thatrocprof
wants to see the executable linked toroctx64.so
. That may not be the case when the connector is linked at runtime via dlsym. And so these leftovers came from attempts to makeroctx64.so
appear among the linked libraries.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Uggg. That thing really something that should be handled at construction.
I suspect value-initialization
does what you want.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Indeed :) I used this piece of code because all connectors are currently doing it this way. It may be best to address the issue for all connectors in a separate PR? One way forward might be to provide default initialisers using
= NULL
for the function pointers in the declaration of the struct inKokkos_Profiling_C_interface.h
?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
You are right. This is fine then.
And yes definitely fix elsewhere.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
OK. I made issue