Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat(RealitioProxy): update contract for V2 #1

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

unknownunknown1
Copy link

@unknownunknown1 unknownunknown1 commented Feb 28, 2024

  • The main proxy contract wasn't actually modified but replaced with the contract from local repo.
  • Governance functions are removed since we never use governance in RealitioProxies.
  • Metaevidence currently uses the old pattern with template registry as a placeholder.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Introduced a new RealitioProxyV2 contract with enhanced arbitration functionalities.
    • Added new interfaces IRealitio and IRealitioArbitrator to facilitate external interactions.
    • Implemented new functions for governors to change arbitration parameters and template registries.
    • Enhanced error handling with custom errors.
  • Improvements

    • Updated constructor parameters and initialization for better configuration.
    • Simplified dispute handling by introducing new structs and enums.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Enhanced error handling to provide clearer feedback for incorrect operations.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Jul 8, 2024

Walkthrough

In the RealityV2 contract, major updates have been made, starting with renaming the contract to RealitioProxyV2. Key enhancements include adding new functions, modifiers, enums, and structs to improve arbitration handling, constructor parameter updates, and error handling advancements. Additionally, two interfaces have been introduced (IRealitio and IRealitioArbitrator) to streamline interactions with arbitration processes.

Changes

File Change Summary
contracts/src/RealityV2.sol The contract RealityV2 renamed to RealitioProxyV2, added new functions, modifiers, structs, enums, and enhanced storage variables, constructor parameters, and error handling.
contracts/src/interfaces/IRealitio.sol Introduced interface IRealitio with functions for arbitration notifications and answer submissions.
contracts/src/interfaces/IRealitioArbitrator.sol Introduced interface IRealitioArbitrator with functions to access Realitio implementation, metadata, and dispute fees.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant User
    participant RealitioProxyV2
    participant IRealitio
    participant IRealitioArbitrator
    
    User->>RealitioProxyV2: requestArbitration(questionID)
    RealitioProxyV2->>IRealitioArbitrator: getDisputeFee(questionID)
    IRealitioArbitrator-->>RealitioProxyV2: disputeFee
    RealitioProxyV2->>IRealitio: notifyOfArbitrationRequest(questionID)
    IRealitio-->>RealitioProxyV2: confirmation
    RealitioProxyV2-->>User: Arbitration Requested

    User->>RealitioProxyV2: rule(questionID, ruling)
    RealitioProxyV2->>IRealitio: assignWinnerAndSubmitAnswerByArbitrator( questionID, answer, ...)
    IRealitio-->>RealitioProxyV2: confirmation
    RealitioProxyV2-->>User: Ruling Submitted
Loading

Poem

In fields where coders daily strive,
Contract changes come alive.
RealitioProxyV2 stands tall,
Handling disputes, addressing all.
New structs, enums to construct,
In code, the magic's now unstuck.
🐇✨ Here's to progress and the code anew,
Realitio, we'll depend on you!


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between a8eb00a and a7a943a.

Files selected for processing (3)
  • contracts/src/RealityV2.sol (1 hunks)
  • contracts/src/interfaces/IRealitio.sol (1 hunks)
  • contracts/src/interfaces/IRealitioArbitrator.sol (1 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (15)
contracts/src/interfaces/IRealitioArbitrator.sol (3)

21-21: LGTM!

The function signature adheres to best practices.


28-28: LGTM!

The function signature adheres to best practices.


32-32: LGTM!

The function signature adheres to best practices.

contracts/src/interfaces/IRealitio.sol (2)

23-27: LGTM!

The function signature adheres to best practices.


37-43: LGTM!

The function signature adheres to best practices.

contracts/src/RealityV2.sol (10)

66-98: LGTM!

The constructor initializes all parameters correctly and follows best practices.


103-104: LGTM!

The function logic is correct and follows best practices.


111-122: LGTM!

The function logic is correct and follows best practices.


129-135: LGTM!

The function logic is correct and follows best practices.


141-143: LGTM!

The function logic is correct and follows best practices.


149-170: LGTM!

The function logic is correct and follows best practices.


176-188: LGTM!

The function logic is correct and follows best practices.


197-210: LGTM!

The function logic is correct and follows best practices.


215-220: LGTM!

The function logic is correct and follows best practices.


222-226: LGTM!

The error definitions are correct and follow best practices.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant