Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: contract bindings #132

Merged

Conversation

thomas192
Copy link
Contributor

Created the bindings using Cainome.

I suppose next step would be testing, but Sepolia deployment is required if I'm not mistaken.

First time doing this, let me know if changes are needed.

Copy link

vercel bot commented Mar 28, 2024

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

1 Ignored Deployment
Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
blobstream-starknet ⬜️ Ignored (Inspect) Visit Preview Apr 4, 2024 8:29pm

@thomas192 thomas192 changed the title feat: Contract bindings feat: contract bindings Mar 30, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@drspacemn drspacemn left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is the library name autogenerated by cainome? Can we change it to bindings?

Also can you provide a line in the README.md for generating/updating the bindings?

library/.gitignore Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@thomas192
Copy link
Contributor Author

Is the library name autogenerated by cainome? Can we change it to bindings?

Also can you provide a line in the README.md for generating/updating the bindings?

Indeed it can be named bindings.
Made the update.

@drspacemn
Copy link
Contributor

brilliant. lgtm.

@drspacemn drspacemn merged commit 409040a into keep-starknet-strange:main Apr 4, 2024
5 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants