-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 8
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
JuliaCon review #168
Comments
Hello @ranocha, Thank you very much for your review! I pushed some changes to the paper branch and addressed most of the points you mentioned. Please let me know if you have further comments on these changes. I have some questions regarding the open points. Regarding the first bullet point, Kerstin Weinberg provided extended guidance and support throughout the development of the Julia package, offering regular feedback on its direction and plans. Extended pair programming sessions were also used, enhancing our debugging approach and overall code quality. I checked the link in SECURITY.md with different machines, and it worked for me. I compared it with the link in |
It's required for the review process. Your answer is fine with me - that's why I have suggested several options to justify this. It's just part of the (JOSS) review process, which is a bit different from standard journals (due to the focus on code). |
Did you try that while not being logged-in as an admin of this repo? |
Please remember to release a new version of the software including your recent improvements - and to merge/rebase your paper branch accordingly so that it contains the full software (see https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/submitting.html#submission-requirements) |
Yes, within a private browser window and on different machines. Then it is necessary to sign in to submit a security vulnerability. |
Thank you for this reminder! I will submit a patch release with all changes after #167 is fixed. |
This was it - now it works for me as well |
I'll close this in favor of #167 |
This is part of the review JuliaCon/proceedings-review#165
Thanks a lot for your contributions 🙂 Please find below some comments based on the review checklist:
Based on the contributors overview, it is questionable whether Kerstin Weinberg can be an author of this publication - one commit with two lines changes in the README.md. There is also another contributor oldninja with more commits.
Please clarify this aspect (e.g., by extended guidance and mentorship by her, pair programming, ...) and note that basically the JOSS policy applies.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: