Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Nix flakes only #1276

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Aug 22, 2023
Merged

Nix flakes only #1276

merged 2 commits into from
Aug 22, 2023

Conversation

rsoeldner
Copy link
Member

This PR updates our README on using Nix to build pact.
Currently, we advertised the use of nix-build with a different package set, (see #1275 for example).

TODO:

  • take down the wiki page

PR checklist:

  • Test coverage for the proposed changes
  • PR description contains example output from repl interaction or a snippet from unit test output
  • Documentation has been updated if new natives or FV properties have been added. To generate new documentation, issue cabal run tests. If they pass locally, docs are generated.
  • Any changes that could be relevant to users have been recorded in the changelog
  • In case of changes to the Pact trace output (pact -t), make sure pact-lsp is in sync.

Additionally, please justify why you should or should not do the following:

  • Confirm replay/back compat
  • Benchmark regressions
  • (For Kadena engineers) Run integration-tests against a Chainweb built with this version of Pact

README.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link
Contributor

@enobayram enobayram left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM! Thanks for the changes!

@emilypi emilypi merged commit e33e2c0 into master Aug 22, 2023
7 checks passed
@emilypi emilypi deleted the rsoeldner/nix-flake-only branch August 22, 2023 19:14
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants