Skip to content

Conversation

@gavlooth
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

Copy link
Member

@jeaye jeaye left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for the PR! I have one suggestion and I've looped in Emma for a review as well.

(testing "function sometimes returns []"
(is (= [1 3 5] (mapcat #(if (odd? %) [%] []) (range 1 6)))))
(testing "function sometimes returns nil"
(is (= [2 4] (mapcat #(if (even? %) [%] nil) (range 1 5)))))
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

mapcat has a variadic arity, which we should test by passing many sequences. The most we're doing, in these tests, is two sequences.

@E-A-Griffin
Copy link
Collaborator

Thanks for both of y'all's work! I'll take a look tonight

Copy link
Collaborator

@E-A-Griffin E-A-Griffin left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Great work! Just some small suggestions



(when-var-exists mapcat
(deftest common-cases
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

nitpick but why isn't the test name based on the var it's testing?

(mapcat identity 5))))
(testing "non-function first arg"
(is (thrown? #?(:cljs :default :clj Exception :cljr Exception)
(mapcat 42 [1 2]))))))
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'd add one more negative test for when the result of mapping isn't a concatable data structure, e.g.

(mapcat identity (range 2))
;; => Exception

@E-A-Griffin
Copy link
Collaborator

@gavlooth if you're busy I don't mind making the changes, just would need write access to push to your fork

@jeaye
Copy link
Member

jeaye commented Oct 14, 2025

@gavlooth if you're busy I don't mind making the changes, just would need write access to push to your fork

Want to spin up a PR based on this branch to address the feedback?

@E-A-Griffin E-A-Griffin mentioned this pull request Oct 15, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants