[chore] Update redux and react-redux to latest version

[hari45678]

Which problem is this PR solving?

• resolves [Deps]: Upgrade react-redux to 9.x #2530

Description of the changes

• With redux 5, type of an action is now a string. According to them, this change is to make the action obj serializable. Change log: https://redux.js.org/usage/migrations/migrating-rtk-2#action-types-must-be-strings
• In the test, due to some import error, redux no longer has configurable properties, and jest requires them to be configurable for spying and changing their behavior. More context on this.
• Since we are using requireActual in jest.mock, it would anyway be the actual implementation of functions for other test cases.

How was this change tested?

• npm run start is working fine with Trace Diff page

Checklist

• I have read https://github.com/jaegertracing/jaeger/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING_GUIDELINES.md
• I have signed all commits
• I have added unit tests for the new functionality
• I have run lint and test steps successfully
  • for jaeger: make lint test
  • for jaeger-ui: npm run lint and npm run test

[hari45678]

I can see PR #2535 is also trying to solve the linked issue, though it wasn't updated (was failing on tests and lint) at the time I created this PR, so I can close this PR if necessary. Would look out other issues.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 96.63%. Comparing base (9feb3bd) to head (526d360).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #2537   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   96.63%   96.63%           
=======================================
  Files         255      255           
  Lines        7728     7728           
  Branches     2002     1950   -52     
=======================================
  Hits         7468     7468           
  Misses        260      260           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[yurishkuro]

I like this PR better than #2535 because it's smaller and still passes the CI. Why are the other changes in #2535 ?

[hari45678]

I like this PR better than #2535 because it's smaller and still passes the CI. Why are the other changes in #2535 ?

I couldn't find a reason to modify the already written tests for such a change

[yurishkuro]

Thanks!