Merge pull request #27 from jaebradley/convert-to-rollup

build(rollup): build library using rollup.js

.babelrc

@@ -1,9 +1,24 @@
 {
-  "presets": [
-    "@babel/preset-env"
-  ],
-  "ignore": [
-    "node_modules/**",
-    "*.test.js"
-  ]
-}
+    "env": {
+      "test": {
+        "presets": [
+          [
+            "@babel/preset-env",
+            { "modules": "umd" }
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      "production": {
+        "presets": [
+          [
+            "@babel/preset-env",
+            { "modules": false }
+          ]
+        ]
+      }
+    },
+    "ignore": [
+      "node_modules/**",
+      "*.test.js"
+    ]
+  }

.npmignore

@@ -1,9 +1,16 @@
+node_modules/**
+
+src/**
+test/**
+coverage/**
+
+npm-debug.log
+commitlint.config.js
+*.test.js
+
 .DS_Store
 .eslintcache
-node_modules
-npm-debug.log
 .travis.yml
-src/
-test/
-*.test.js
-coverage/
+.babelrc
+.eslintignore
+.eslintrc

.travis.yml

@@ -13,7 +13,7 @@ jobs:
   include:
     - stage: test
       script:
-        - npm run compile
+        - npm run build
         - npm run lint
         - npm run test
       before_script: greenkeeper-lockfile-update

README.md

@@ -1,24 +1,31 @@
+# `email-prop-type`
+
+[![Greenkeeper badge](https://badges.greenkeeper.io/jaebradley/email-prop-type.svg)](https://greenkeeper.io/)
 [![Build Status](https://travis-ci.org/jaebradley/email-prop-type.svg?branch=master)](https://travis-ci.org/jaebradley/email-prop-type)
 [![codecov](https://codecov.io/gh/jaebradley/email-prop-type/branch/master/graph/badge.svg)](https://codecov.io/gh/jaebradley/email-prop-type)
 [![npm](https://img.shields.io/npm/dt/email-prop-type.svg)](https://www.npmjs.com/package/email-prop-type)
 [![npm](https://img.shields.io/npm/v/email-prop-type.svg)](https://www.npmjs.com/package/email-prop-type)
-[![Greenkeeper badge](https://badges.greenkeeper.io/jaebradley/email-prop-type.svg)](https://greenkeeper.io/)
-
-# Email Prop Type
 
 ## Introduction
-This package is used to validate if a React Prop value is a valid email.
+
+This package is used to validate if a React Prop value is a valid email address.
 
 Currently, there is no email prop type defined by [the `prop-types` package](https://www.npmjs.com/package/prop-types). While using `PropType.string` works, why not be as specific as possible when validating your props?
 
 Additionally, though [it's relatively straightforward to create a custom prop type validator](https://www.ian-thomas.net/custom-proptype-validation-with-react/), if you need to implement similar prop type checking in multiple packages, you might not want to repeat yourself.
 
-Depends on [the `isemail` package](https://www.npmjs.com/package/isemail). While the `isemail` package has options to [specify various error levels](https://github.com/hapijs/isemail#validateemail-options-callback), `email-prop-type` implements the highest level of granularity, i.e. a perfectly granular email address.
+Depends on [the `email-validator` package](https://github.com/Sembiance/email-validator).
 
 ## Installation
-`npm install --save email-prop-type`
+
+```bash
+npm install --save email-prop-type
+```
+
+As mentioned above, `email-prop-type` depends on the `email-validator` package. You need to install this package as a peer dependency of `email-prop-type`.
 
 ## Example Usage
+
 ```javascript
 import React from 'react';
 import PropTypes from 'prop-types';
@@ -36,6 +43,8 @@ Hyperlink.propTypes = {
 ```
 
 ## Alternatives
+
 I didn't see many alternatives:
-  * It doesn't look like [the `airbnb/prop-types` project](https://github.com/airbnb/prop-types) has email validation.
-  * There's also [the `react-validator-prop-types` library](https://www.npmjs.com/package/react-validator-prop-types) but if you just want email validation, it might be too heavyweight.
+
+* It doesn't look like [the `airbnb/prop-types` project](https://github.com/airbnb/prop-types) has email validation.
+* There's also [the `react-validator-prop-types` library](https://www.npmjs.com/package/react-validator-prop-types) but if you just want email validation, it might be too heavyweight.