Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

new(docs): add an auto-generated eBPF timeline #71

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Oct 20, 2024

Conversation

Andreagit97
Copy link
Contributor

@Andreagit97 Andreagit97 commented Oct 19, 2024

The idea behind this PR is to add a timeline for all ebpf features, taking advantage of the scraping logic already present in this repo. The timeline uses the information collected in data/feature-versions.yaml(the same file used for generating tags in the documentation).

I see at least 2 possible use cases here:

  • a new kernel version is out and you want to check in a unique place all the new features introduced
  • you need to develop something with some kernel version constraints and you can easily see what you can you and what you cannot

New Timeline:

Screenshot from 2024-10-19 12-45-41

This is done to extend the feature-gen tool in the following commits

Signed-off-by: Andrea Terzolo <[email protected]>
@Andreagit97 Andreagit97 changed the title Add ebpf timeline new(docs): add an auto-generated eBPF timeline Oct 19, 2024
Copy link
Collaborator

@dylandreimerink dylandreimerink left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This is great! Never thought of using the existing data this way. Thank you

tools/feature-gen/timeline.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
regenerate the timeline

Co-authored-by: Dylan Reimerink <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Andrea Terzolo <[email protected]>
@dylandreimerink dylandreimerink merged commit 05ce42c into isovalent:master Oct 20, 2024
1 check passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants