Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

testing #379

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Open

testing #379

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

Nithunikzz
Copy link
Collaborator

No description provided.

Copy link

dryrunsecurity bot commented Jun 8, 2024

Hi there 👋, @DryRunSecurity here, below is a summary of our analysis and findings.

DryRun Security Status Findings
Configured Codepaths Analyzer 0 findings
IDOR Analyzer 0 findings
Sensitive Files Analyzer 0 findings
Authn/Authz Analyzer 0 findings
AppSec Analyzer 0 findings
Secrets Analyzer 0 findings

Note

🟢 Risk threshold not exceeded.

Change Summary (click to expand)

The following is a summary of changes in this pull request made by me, your security buddy 🤖. Note that this summary is auto-generated and not meant to be a definitive list of security issues but rather a helpful summary from a security perspective.

Summary:

The provided code changes focus on the implementation and testing of a NATS client for publishing Git metrics in the application. The changes include the introduction of a NATSClientInterface to improve flexibility and testability, secure connection establishment using MTLS, and the management of NATS streams and publishing of metrics. Additionally, the code includes a comprehensive test suite for the Application struct, covering various aspects such as API endpoints, initialization, and shutdown.

From an application security perspective, the changes do not introduce any obvious security concerns. The code correctly handles MTLS configuration, input validation, and error handling. The use of mocks and test cases helps ensure the reliability and robustness of the application. Additionally, the use of the gin-gonic/gin framework provides built-in security features, such as protection against XSS and CSRF attacks.

Overall, the changes appear to be well-designed and implemented, with a focus on security best practices. However, it's important to continuously monitor the dependencies and external libraries used in the application to ensure they are up-to-date and do not contain any known security vulnerabilities.

Files Changed:

  1. agent/git/pkg/application/application.go: This file contains changes to the Application struct, where the conn field is updated to use the clients.NATSClientInterface instead of the clients.NATSContext. This change improves the flexibility and testability of the Application struct.

  2. agent/git/pkg/clients/mocks/nats_client_mock.go: This file introduces a mock implementation of the NATSClientInterface, which can be used for testing purposes. The mock implementation allows for simulating various scenarios, including potential security vulnerabilities, without relying on the actual NATS client implementation.

  3. agent/git/pkg/clients/nats_client.go: This file contains the implementation of the NATS client, including the establishment of secure connections using MTLS, the management of NATS streams, and the publishing of Git metrics.

  4. agent/git/pkg/application/handlers_test.go: This file includes a comprehensive test suite for the Application struct, covering various aspects such as API endpoints, initialization, and shutdown. The test cases help ensure the reliability and robustness of the application.

Powered by DryRun Security

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant