feat: checker-experiment

[joydeep049]

This experiment is an extension of the CI-Pre-Checker github action. #3840

This script aims to print any and all the checkers which have {product,version} pairs in their VENDOR_PRODUCT which do NOT have any associated,reported CVEs
After this experiment is done and all the pre-existing checkers are taken care of , we can proceed to add the CI-Pre-checker github action for any newly added/updated checkers.

Result: All the pre-existing checkers are in the clear.
We can go ahead and add the github action.

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 75.71%. Comparing base (d6cbe40) to head (f3fb022).
Report is 38 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #3873      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   75.41%   75.71%   +0.30%     
==========================================
  Files         808      809       +1     
  Lines       11983    12108     +125     
  Branches     1598     1634      +36     
==========================================
+ Hits         9037     9168     +131     
+ Misses       2593     2588       -5     
+ Partials      353      352       -1     

Flag	Coverage Δ
longtests	75.71% <ø> (+0.30%)	⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[joydeep049]

I'll look into the checker experiment PR once I'm done with my midsems.
Meanwhile get well soon @terriko :)

[terriko]

Marking this as blocked because I honestly don't know what to do with it right now and I don't intend to review it again until after the 3.3 release is out.