Skip to content

extend support for Granite Rapids D #386

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 7 commits into from
Jun 23, 2025
Merged

extend support for Granite Rapids D #386

merged 7 commits into from
Jun 23, 2025

Conversation

harp-intel
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@harp-intel harp-intel requested a review from Copilot June 18, 2025 18:22
Copy link
Contributor

@Copilot Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull Request Overview

This PR extends support for Granite Rapids D by adding the new model "174" (representing Granite Rapids D) to various model lists used in script definitions, table definitions, and configuration checks.

  • Updated model lists in internal/script/script_defs.go to include "174".
  • Expanded model arrays in internal/report/table_defs.go with "174" and updated comments accordingly.
  • Modified conditional logic in cmd/config/set.go to recognize "174" as a valid model.

Reviewed Changes

Copilot reviewed 3 out of 3 changed files in this pull request and generated 3 comments.

File Description
internal/script/script_defs.go Added "174" to model arrays and updated inline comments to reflect the support for Granite Rapids D.
internal/report/table_defs.go Extended the models lists to include "174" and adjusted comment notes.
cmd/config/set.go Modified model validation conditions to include "174" as a supported model.

@harp-intel harp-intel merged commit 70b44b9 into main Jun 23, 2025
4 checks passed
@harp-intel harp-intel deleted the gnrd branch June 23, 2025 17:09
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant