Removed IETF Should #3
Conversation
draft-iab-bias-workshop-report.md
Outdated
| - IETF should continue to work on protocol enhancements that protect user privacy. | ||
| - IETF should continue to work on protocols or protocl extensions that enable more transparency on filtering and promote their use and deployment. | ||
| - IETF should continue to work on VPN-like services and potentially support measurements to understand their deployment and use. | ||
| - There is a need to build consensus on solutions that foster digital inclusion. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actually, looking on this again, I'm not sure I fully understand this point. Why is this about build consensus (rather than building solutions that support digital inclusion)?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
It comes from the comment made that IETF is a good venue for consensus building to ensure experts are on the same page and then promote that to policy folks and government! Earlier I did not want to mention "promote" because we started with 'IETF should' but now this can be reworded. How about --
- Build consensus on solutions that have the most significant impact in fostering digital inclusion. Further, promoting these solutions ensures that efforts to bridge the digital divide are effective and inclusive.
draft-iab-bias-workshop-report.md
Outdated
| - IETF should continue to work on VPN-like services and potentially support measurements to understand their deployment and use. | ||
| - There is a need to build consensus on solutions that foster digital inclusion. | ||
| - Further work to enhance protocols ensuring user privacy should continue. | ||
| - Develop new protocols (or extensions to existing protocols) that enable more transparency on filtering and promote their use and deployment. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
There are already some protocols like draft-ietf-dnsop-structured-dns-error and I think there is also an extension for http which I can find right now. So I think the word "continue" was kind of better here. Maybe we just say s/Develop new/Develop further/?
No description provided.