Skip to content

Make LICENSE more apparent #477

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Open
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
36 changes: 25 additions & 11 deletions LICENSE
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -1,11 +1,25 @@
Copyright (c) 2020 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
document authors. All rights reserved.

This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
Provisions Relating to IETF Documents (https://trustee.ietf.org/
license-info) in effect on the date of publication of this document.
Please review these documents carefully, as they describe your rights
and restrictions with respect to this document. Code Components
extracted from this document must include Simplified BSD License text
as described in Section 4.e of the Trust Legal Provisions and are
provided without warranty as described in the Simplified BSD License.
BSD 2-Clause License
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The BSD license is only applicable to code components and not to specs. See https://trustee.ietf.org/
license-info.

Copy link
Author

@akirataguchi115 akirataguchi115 Jun 9, 2023

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I was hoping someone would notice this. Does it become too complicated if we restructure the code components to their own sub-directory and specs to their own so that we could get two LICENSE files pointing which materials have their corresponding licenses: https://softwareengineering.stackexchange.com/questions/304874/declaring-multiple-licences-in-a-github-project#answer-304895 ?

Copy link
Member

@cabo cabo Jun 9, 2023

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Does it become too complicated

I would probably answer this affirmatively.

Right now, we don't identify anything in the draft explicitly as a "code component".

The directory scripts could of course have its own license file -- none of this goes into the document, so it is useful to be explicit about the license (ignoring whether the "threshold of originality" is even reached).

The other potential code component is the ABNF, for which the scripts directory provides ways to extract it from the document, but the repo doesn't actually store the (computed) result. So there is no directory a license could be attached to.

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Good reasoning. However isn't the license currently too vague and interpretable?


Copyright (c) 2020, IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
document authors.

Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without
modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions are met:

1. Redistributions of source code must retain the above copyright notice, this
list of conditions and the following disclaimer.

2. Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the above copyright notice,
this list of conditions and the following disclaimer in the documentation
and/or other materials provided with the distribution.

THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED BY THE COPYRIGHT HOLDERS AND CONTRIBUTORS "AS IS"
AND ANY EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, THE
IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE ARE
DISCLAIMED. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE COPYRIGHT HOLDER OR CONTRIBUTORS BE LIABLE
FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, EXEMPLARY, OR CONSEQUENTIAL
DAMAGES (INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, PROCUREMENT OF SUBSTITUTE GOODS OR
SERVICES; LOSS OF USE, DATA, OR PROFITS; OR BUSINESS INTERRUPTION) HOWEVER
CAUSED AND ON ANY THEORY OF LIABILITY, WHETHER IN CONTRACT, STRICT LIABILITY,
OR TORT (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE) ARISING IN ANY WAY OUT OF THE USE
OF THIS SOFTWARE, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE.
4 changes: 0 additions & 4 deletions LICENSE.md

This file was deleted.