Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Remove
@slow
fortest_eager_matches_sdpa_inference
#34558Remove
@slow
fortest_eager_matches_sdpa_inference
#34558Changes from 8 commits
9c040bd
72184d9
ac16809
631cdec
271306b
7082ba0
2779c68
c18c6c6
69021b5
f709dbb
296c068
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
On skips like this, on Albert and other models: the test pulls the main input and the attention mask to manipulate them, finally sending them to the model. We could
pop
these items frominputs_dict
, and then pass**inputs_dict
to the model (e.g.model_eager(**prepared_inputs, **inputs_dict)
) -- I think then we wouldn't need to skip tests due to missing inputs 🤗There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Maybe let's merge and do this in a follow-up PR. It's never worked before.
Large diffs are not rendered by default.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
i think this test dont need skip anymore since we dont check if model has SDPA layers within this test anymore. But it can be skipped due to the same flakiness
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It still has input preparation issues, where I added below to another model test class
As mentioned in a reply to Joao's comment, let's try to do it in a follow up PR