chore(test): merge deno runtime coverage

[usualoma]

Checking the results in github actions...

The author should do the following, if applicable

• Add tests
• Run tests
• bun run format:fix && bun run lint:fix to format the code
• Add TSDoc/JSDoc to document the code

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 94.91%. Comparing base (f87c221) to head (ebf9ea7).
Report is 2 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #3456      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   95.58%   94.91%   -0.68%     
==========================================
  Files         155      155              
  Lines        9357     9884     +527     
  Branches     2779     2796      +17     
==========================================
+ Hits         8944     9381     +437     
- Misses        413      501      +88     
- Partials        0        2       +2     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[usualoma]

On Codecov, the coverage results for "coverage/deno-runtime-coverage.lcov" overwrite the results for main, resulting in a lower coverage rate. It would be nice if the results could be merged.

[usualoma]

When generating lcov format data from deno coverage, some comment lines are incorrectly treated as executable lines, resulting in unnecessary uncovered.

[usualoma]

I have created a pull request to fix this issue in deno. Whether or not it is merged is up to deno.

denoland/deno#25939

[yusukebe]

@usualoma Thanks!