PHEP 2: PHEP template

[jtniehof]

This is a template following the format requirements of PHEP 1 (#22) with the intention of making it easier to copy/paste into starting a new PHEP.

The template does mix directions on what to do, the PHEP-required content of PHEP 2 itself, and the content to be filled in on the new PHEP. I hope that's not too unclear--we could try, say, italicizing everything to make it clear if someone using the template leaves in template language, but that doesn't solve the problem of distinguishing the rest. Maybe it's perfectly clear to the reader.

• Rendered current text
• Diff since first push on 2023-12-06

[jtniehof]

@sapols , hoping I can ask you to serve as editor again :) In particular I didn't want to just "steal" number 2...gotta do these things right.

My thought is to edit and force push once the number is assigned. I think this makes the history more clear, and I can update PHEP 1 to explicitly say force-push is okay while the PR is in draft (not the same as the PHEP being in draft!)--it makes it easier to track the filename.

[sapols]

Phenomenal template. Love it.

[jtniehof]

Phenomenal template. Love it.

Good for me to self-assign PHEP 2 and non-draft, or do you need further format/compliance review?

[sapols]

Good for me to self-assign PHEP 2 and non-draft, or do you need further format/compliance review?

I could use a bit longer to re-read it one last time, closer.

[sapols]

Literally my only request is to add those periods to the ends of those list items for consistency. Otherwise I approve this template.

@jtniehof feel free to self-assign PHEP-2 and non-draft once these changes are made.

[jtniehof]

Literally my only request is to add those periods to the ends of those list items for consistency. Otherwise I approve this template.

Done, and thanks!

[jibarnum]

Didn't mean to add myself as an official reviewer on this. @sapols 's got the ultimate approval as editor on this PHEP, but I'm throwing support behind the comment he made :

Phenomenal template. Love it.

[jtniehof]

Didn't mean to add myself as an official reviewer on this. @sapols 's got the ultimate approval as editor on this PHEP, but I'm throwing support behind the comment he made :

Anybody can do a GH "review" of the PR to give their feedback, so no problem. The editorial decision is just at assigning a number and going from draft to "ready for review".

[jtniehof]

New version pushed largely reflecting the revision process in PHEP 1 (#22)

[jtniehof]

@sapols, do you have any suggestions for this from experience with #29 ? Otherwise I will ask Julie to put the first vote on the telecon schedule.

[sapols]

@jtniehof I found it great to use, no notes! I second moving to vote as-is.