Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix classification retrieval for updated Elasticsearch version #142

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Apr 1, 2025

Conversation

fsteeg
Copy link
Member

@fsteeg fsteeg commented Mar 31, 2025

See https://jira.hbz-nrw.de/browse/RPB-266

The actual fix is in 48d0f35, this PR also adds some performance improvements related to the classification index.

fsteeg added 4 commits March 31, 2025 13:46
Relative threshold interferes with small internal index too early
Default setting resulted in 588 missing classification entries.
With Elasticsearch 5.6, this resulted in missing top-level entries,
while previously the missing entries went unnoticed.
The classifications are only updated manually and require a restart
Counts are retrieved via aggregations, the lookups don't add any
additional results, they only increase runtime and network traffic
@fsteeg fsteeg requested a review from dr0i March 31, 2025 15:05
@dr0i dr0i assigned fsteeg and unassigned dr0i Apr 1, 2025
@fsteeg fsteeg merged commit d67ae87 into main Apr 1, 2025
1 check passed
@fsteeg fsteeg deleted the rpb-266-spatialData branch April 1, 2025 08:20
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants