Use modified setup for building vendored libsecp256k1 #5
Conversation
…s, and enable schnorr as this lib has bindings to it
…whereas the HEAD that was submoduled is... well, master...
… dep in travis since we're building our own
…precations since Prim marks them as well
|
this would be really great! |
|
@ProofOfKeags what's missing to push this forward? I'm happy to assist, if I can. |
|
Is this just making it so that we build libsecp256k1 from source? |
|
I only skimmed it briefly, but it looks to me like building from source instead of relying on some pre-installed library. I'd love to see this, especially since libsecp256k1 is now shipped on many linux platforms, but without schnorr signatures. So it becomes less of a hassle to setup locally. |
|
I'll build and test today or tomorrow. |
|
Does this work on all platforms or is it Linux only? Would be absolutely awesome to be able to just cabal install this lib and it just works on all platforms. |
I can only test for MacOS right now. |
|
Let me know how it goes, I can test Linux.
…On Thu, Oct 3, 2024, 16:10 ProofOfKeags ***@***.***> wrote:
Does this work on all platforms or is it Linux only? Would be absolutely
awesome to be able to just cabal install this lib and it just works on all
platforms.
I can only test for MacOS right now.
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#5 (comment)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AADAJPF46VHGV6F5XF5RI7TZZWQCZAVCNFSM6AAAAABO74A3EWVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZDGOJSGI2DGMJZHA>
.
You are receiving this because you commented.Message ID:
***@***.***>
|
No description provided.