SRE-805: Install Rust-ecosystem CI tools from GitHub releases via mise aqua backend by claude[bot] · Pull Request #9017 · hashintel/hash

claude · 2026-07-13T12:47:06Z

Requested by Tim Diekmann · Slack thread

🌟 What is the purpose of this PR?

Before: Vercel builds fail at ./vercel-install.sh with mise ERROR Failed to install tools: cargo:wasm-opt@0.116.1, cargo:wasm-pack@0.15.0. mise re-resolves every config-declared tool's version on each install/use/reshim, and the cargo backend's only version source is crates.io/api/v1/crates//versions, which rate-limits Vercel's shared egress IPs (429) — roughly 8 mise invocations per build × 7 crates × retries ≈ 170 requests inside 75 seconds, and failed lookups aren't cached.

After: the tools that ship exact-version prebuilt GitHub releases for all four supported platforms (linux-x64, linux-arm64, macos-x64, macos-arm64) install via mise's aqua backend instead (checksum-verified, zero crates.io traffic):

wasm-pack → aqua:wasm-bindgen/wasm-pack (upstream moved to wasm-bindgen/wasm-pack; same 0.15.0)
cargo-llvm-cov → aqua:taiki-e/cargo-llvm-cov (0.8.7)
cargo-nextest → aqua:nextest-rs/nextest/cargo-nextest (0.9.137; aqua maps this to release tag cargo-nextest-0.9.137)

wasm-opt does not change backend anywhere — it stays on cargo:wasm-opt, like cargo-insta, because binaryen publishes no linux-arm64 prebuilt binaries (the aqua registry marks it supported_envs: [darwin, amd64]) and wasm-opt runs inside the arm64 Docker image builds. An earlier revision of this PR split wasm-opt across two backends (aqua on amd64/darwin, cargo on arm64); that dual setup has been dropped — the committed mise.lock (from #9000, now enforced on main via mise install --locked) already pins the cargo-backend tools to exact versions and eliminates their crates.io version-listing calls, which was the whole point of the swap.

How/notes: cargo:wasm-opt, cargo:cargo-insta, cargo:cargo-hack, and cargo:cargo-codspeed stay on the cargo backend — wasm-opt and cargo-insta lack linux-arm64 prebuilts and both execute in the arm64 Docker image builds, cargo-hack has no aqua registry entry, and codspeed ships bare linux-musl-only binaries that would break macOS dev machines. With the lockfile enforced, their installs no longer hit the crates.io versions API. Installed binary names are unchanged, so all invocations (wasm-pack build, wasm-opt, cargo insta, cargo llvm-cov, cargo nextest) keep working as-is.

⚠️ Remaining step (required before CI can pass)

.config/mise/mise.lock does not yet contain entries for the three aqua-backed tools — aqua lock entries need per-platform release URLs and checksums that can only be generated with GitHub network access, which the authoring sandbox does not have. The stale cargo: lock entries for the renamed tools have been pruned; until the aqua entries are added, every mise install --locked setup job on this branch fails with … is not in the lockfile. On a machine with GitHub access, run:

mise lock "aqua:wasm-bindgen/wasm-pack" "aqua:nextest-rs/nextest/cargo-nextest" "aqua:taiki-e/cargo-llvm-cov" -p linux-x64,linux-arm64,macos-x64,macos-arm64

and commit the resulting .config/mise/mise.lock to this branch.

🔗 Related links

SRE-805: Harden Docker mise tool installation against transient upstream failures #9000 — mise.lock groundwork (SRE-805), now merged: main enforces mise install --locked, so every tool needs a lockfile entry
aqua-registry: wasm-bindgen/wasm-pack, taiki-e/cargo-llvm-cov, nextest-rs/nextest/cargo-nextest

🔍 What does this change?

.config/mise/config.toml: swaps wasm-pack, cargo-llvm-cov, and cargo-nextest from the cargo: backend to aqua:. cargo:wasm-opt and cargo:cargo-insta stay on the cargo backend (no linux-arm64 prebuilts upstream — see comments in the file). Re-sorted and re-aligned per taplo reorder_keys/align_entries; cargo:cargo-hack, cargo:cargo-codspeed, and cargo-binstall are untouched
.config/mise/mise.lock: removes the stale cargo:wasm-pack, cargo:cargo-llvm-cov, and cargo:cargo-nextest entries (those tool IDs no longer exist in the config). The replacement aqua: entries still need to be generated — see Remaining step above
apps/hash-frontend/vercel-install.sh, apps/petrinaut-website/vercel-install.sh: the explicit mise install … tool list now uses aqua:wasm-bindgen/wasm-pack and keeps cargo:wasm-opt
apps/{hash-api,hash-ai-worker-ts,hash-frontend,hash-integration-worker}/docker/Dockerfile: mise install … uses aqua:wasm-bindgen/wasm-pack and keeps cargo:wasm-opt
libs/@blockprotocol/type-system/rust/package.json: mise exec … cargo:wasm-pack → aqua:wasm-bindgen/wasm-pack in the build:wasm script (tool ID only — the invoked binary is unchanged). All build:types scripts across the repo keep cargo:cargo-insta.

Pre-Merge Checklist 🚀

🚢 Has this modified a publishable library?

This PR:

does not modify any publishable blocks or libraries, or modifications do not need publishing

📜 Does this require a change to the docs?

The changes in this PR:

are internal and do not require a docs change

🕸️ Does this require a change to the Turbo Graph?

The changes in this PR:

do not affect the execution graph

⚠️ Known issues

Setup jobs fail until the lockfile is regenerated — see the Remaining step section above.
The mise config change invalidates turborepo's global cache once (expected — .config/mise is a global input), so the first CI run after merge is a cold build.
cargo-insta was moved to aqua:mitsuhiko/insta in an earlier revision of this PR, then reverted to the cargo: backend: it executes inside the arm64 Docker image builds (the build:types package scripts invoke it via mise exec during turbo build), and its prebuilt releases lack linux-arm64, so the aqua install fails there with unsupported env: linux/arm64. Its exact version is pinned by the committed lockfile.

🛡 What tests cover this?

No unit tests apply. The edited config parses cleanly with mise 2026.7.5 locally — mise ls resolves all aqua: tool IDs; actual installs could not be exercised in the authoring sandbox, so CI on this PR (after the lockfile is regenerated — see Remaining step) is the install verification.

❓ How to test this?

Run the mise lock command from Remaining step and commit the lockfile — until then all setup jobs fail with … is not in the lockfile.
Confirm the Vercel preview deployments (hash-frontend, petrinaut-website) build — ./vercel-install.sh should install aqua:wasm-bindgen/wasm-pack from GitHub releases without touching the crates.io versions API.
Confirm the per-service Docker build validation jobs pass for both amd64 and arm64 — the images keep cargo:wasm-opt in their mise install layer.
Confirm Rust CI jobs that use cargo-insta / cargo-llvm-cov / cargo-nextest still find their binaries (names unchanged).

Generated by Claude Code

vercel · 2026-07-13T12:47:13Z

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

Project	Deployment	Actions	Updated (UTC)
hash	Ready	Preview, Comment	Jul 13, 2026 7:42pm
hashdotdesign-tokens	Ready	Preview, Comment	Jul 13, 2026 7:42pm
petrinaut	Ready	Preview, Comment	Jul 13, 2026 7:42pm

codecov · 2026-07-13T12:52:51Z

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 59.73%. Comparing base (6736174) to head (e17f315).
⚠️ Report is 5 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #9017   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   59.73%   59.73%           
=======================================
  Files        1371     1371           
  Lines      135461   135461           
  Branches     6066     6066           
=======================================
+ Hits        80911    80914    +3     
+ Misses      53618    53615    -3     
  Partials      932      932

Flag	Coverage Δ
rust.harpc-types	`0.00% <ø> (ø)`
rust.harpc-wire-protocol	`92.23% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hashql-diagnostics	`72.51% <ø> (ø)`

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Harness.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

codspeed-hq · 2026-07-13T12:56:16Z

Merging this PR will not alter performance

✅ 98 untouched benchmarks

_{Comparing claude/mise-wasm-tools-github-backend (f2f4db0) with main (b6fb59e)}

TimDiekmann

Your re-trigger commit is not validated. Either run it validated or find another way.

github-actions · 2026-07-13T15:33:51Z

Benchmark results

@rust/hash-graph-benches – Integrations

policy_resolution_large

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 2002	$$27.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 198 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.399 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.42 \mathrm{ms} \pm 17.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.536 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 1002	$$12.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 112 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.471 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 3314	$$42.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 412 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.145 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$14.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 124 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.53 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 1527	$$23.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 279 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.47 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 2078	$$28.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 287 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.826 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.75 \mathrm{ms} \pm 19.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.112 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 1033	$$13.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 84.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.857 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

policy_resolution_medium

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 102	$$3.85 \mathrm{ms} \pm 26.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.81 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.98 \mathrm{ms} \pm 15.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.628 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 52	$$3.41 \mathrm{ms} \pm 24.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.07 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 269	$$5.18 \mathrm{ms} \pm 24.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.255 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.55 \mathrm{ms} \pm 19.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.068 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 108	$$4.15 \mathrm{ms} \pm 26.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.033 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 133	$$4.44 \mathrm{ms} \pm 33.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.957 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.46 \mathrm{ms} \pm 15.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.164 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 63	$$4.17 \mathrm{ms} \pm 39.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.93 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

policy_resolution_none

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 2	$$2.77 \mathrm{ms} \pm 24.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.38 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.52 \mathrm{ms} \pm 14.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.633 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 2	$$2.67 \mathrm{ms} \pm 14.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.124 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 8	$$2.99 \mathrm{ms} \pm 21.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.744 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.79 \mathrm{ms} \pm 22.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.47 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 3	$$2.97 \mathrm{ms} \pm 18.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.129 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

policy_resolution_small

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 52	$$3.06 \mathrm{ms} \pm 18.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.772 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.76 \mathrm{ms} \pm 19.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.080 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 26	$$2.94 \mathrm{ms} \pm 16.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.539 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 94	$$3.45 \mathrm{ms} \pm 21.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.035 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.98 \mathrm{ms} \pm 15.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.067 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 27	$$3.25 \mathrm{ms} \pm 15.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.748 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 66	$$3.40 \mathrm{ms} \pm 23.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.737 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.97 \mathrm{ms} \pm 19.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.893 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 29	$$3.31 \mathrm{ms} \pm 22.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.117 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

read_scaling_complete

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id;one_depth	1 entities	$$41.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 268 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.027 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	10 entities	$$32.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 216 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.550 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	25 entities	$$35.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 248 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.340 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	5 entities	$$32.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 206 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.497 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	50 entities	$$41.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 227 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.206 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	1 entities	$$49.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 279 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.104 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	10 entities	$$39.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 239 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.621 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	25 entities	$$90.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 624 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.700 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	5 entities	$$33.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 170 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.323 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	50 entities	$$274 \mathrm{ms} \pm 966 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-9.889 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	1 entities	$$10.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 70.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.760 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	10 entities	$$10.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 67.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.276 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	25 entities	$$10.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 65.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.906 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	5 entities	$$10.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 47.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.381 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	50 entities	$$10.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 58.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.091 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

read_scaling_linkless

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	1 entities	$$10.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 55.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.353 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	10 entities	$$10.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 58.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.861 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	100 entities	$$10.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 62.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.659 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	1000 entities	$$10.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 66.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.330 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	10000 entities	$$11.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 78.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.428 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_entity

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/block/v/1`	$$11.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 75.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.219 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/book/v/1`	$$11.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 81.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.81 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/building/v/1`	$$10.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 64.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.507 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/organization/v/1`	$$11.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 56.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.216 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/page/v/2`	$$11.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 69.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.286 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/person/v/1`	$$11.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 68.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.270 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/playlist/v/1`	$$11.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 64.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.017 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/song/v/1`	$$11.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 75.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.469 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/uk-address/v/1`	$$11.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 50.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.247 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_entity_type

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
get_entity_type_by_id	Account ID: `bf5a9ef5-dc3b-43cf-a291-6210c0321eba`	$$8.57 \mathrm{ms} \pm 44.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.598 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_multiple_entities

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=0	0	$$55.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 536 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-7.202 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=255	1,resolve_depths=inherit:1;values:255;properties:255;links:127;link_dests:126;type:true	$$111 \mathrm{ms} \pm 539 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-5.012 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:0;link_dests:0;type:false	$$61.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 405 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-6.919 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$71.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 461 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-6.723 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$82.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 426 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-4.972 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:2;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$87.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 678 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-5.538 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=0	0	$$42.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 287 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.917 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=255	1,resolve_depths=inherit:1;values:255;properties:255;links:127;link_dests:126;type:true	$$72.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 403 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.610 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:0;link_dests:0;type:false	$$48.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 294 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.252 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$58.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 396 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.329 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$61.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 394 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.222 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:2;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$61.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 512 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.917 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$

scenarios

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
full_test	query-limited	$$120 \mathrm{ms} \pm 650 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.424 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
full_test	query-unlimited	$$131 \mathrm{ms} \pm 608 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.419 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
linked_queries	query-limited	$$23.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 131 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}26.2 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
linked_queries	query-unlimited	$$525 \mathrm{ms} \pm 1.20 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{gray}-0.651 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

TimDiekmann

You have merge conflicts

…ckend

binaryen ships no linux-arm64 release asset (and the aqua registry limits it to darwin/amd64), so the four arm64 Docker images install wasm-opt via the cargo backend again. amd64/darwin environments (CI, Vercel) keep using binaryen's GitHub releases via aqua. Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01RMbVqCoNeoGCAPRK94LcCF

…rm64 image builds Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01RMbVqCoNeoGCAPRK94LcCF

…for renamed tools Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01RMbVqCoNeoGCAPRK94LcCF

claude Bot assigned TimDiekmann Jul 13, 2026

vercel Bot deployed to Preview – hashdotdesign-tokens July 13, 2026 12:48 View deployment

vercel Bot deployed to Preview – petrinaut July 13, 2026 12:51 View deployment

vercel Bot deployed to Preview – hash July 13, 2026 13:01 View deployment

claude Bot changed the title ~~Install Rust-ecosystem CI tools from GitHub releases via mise aqua backend~~ SRE-805: Install Rust-ecosystem CI tools from GitHub releases via mise aqua backend Jul 13, 2026

vercel Bot deployed to Preview – hashdotdesign-tokens July 13, 2026 13:05 View deployment

vercel Bot deployed to Preview – petrinaut July 13, 2026 13:08 View deployment

vercel Bot deployed to Preview – hashdotdesign-tokens July 13, 2026 13:18 View deployment

vercel Bot deployed to Preview – petrinaut July 13, 2026 13:21 View deployment

vercel Bot temporarily deployed to Preview – petrinaut July 13, 2026 13:27 Inactive

TimDiekmann reviewed Jul 13, 2026

View reviewed changes

claude Bot force-pushed the claude/mise-wasm-tools-github-backend branch from e17f315 to f2f4db0 Compare July 13, 2026 13:34

vercel Bot temporarily deployed to Preview – petrinaut July 13, 2026 13:34 Inactive

TimDiekmann previously approved these changes Jul 13, 2026

View reviewed changes

claude added 3 commits July 13, 2026 19:12

Install Rust-ecosystem CI tools from GitHub releases via mise aqua ba…

451adb2

…ckend

Keep cargo-insta on cargo backend: no linux-arm64 prebuilt, runs in a…

4ee44b3

…rm64 image builds Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01RMbVqCoNeoGCAPRK94LcCF

claude Bot dismissed TimDiekmann’s stale review via 4ee44b3 July 13, 2026 19:15

claude Bot force-pushed the claude/mise-wasm-tools-github-backend branch from f2f4db0 to 4ee44b3 Compare July 13, 2026 19:15

vercel Bot deployed to Preview – hashdotdesign-tokens July 13, 2026 19:17 View deployment

vercel Bot deployed to Preview – petrinaut July 13, 2026 19:20 View deployment

Drop binaryen swap: keep wasm-opt on cargo; prune stale lock entries …

631d600

…for renamed tools Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01RMbVqCoNeoGCAPRK94LcCF

vercel Bot deployed to Preview – hashdotdesign-tokens July 13, 2026 19:29 View deployment

vercel Bot deployed to Preview – petrinaut July 13, 2026 19:31 View deployment

vercel Bot deployed to Preview – hash July 13, 2026 19:42 View deployment

Provide feedback

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

Uh oh!

SRE-805: Install Rust-ecosystem CI tools from GitHub releases via mise aqua backend#9017

SRE-805: Install Rust-ecosystem CI tools from GitHub releases via mise aqua backend#9017
claude[bot] wants to merge 4 commits into
mainfrom
claude/mise-wasm-tools-github-backend

claude Bot commented Jul 13, 2026 •

edited

Loading

Uh oh!

vercel Bot commented Jul 13, 2026 •

edited

Loading

Uh oh!

codecov Bot commented Jul 13, 2026 •

edited

Loading

Uh oh!

codspeed-hq Bot commented Jul 13, 2026 •

edited

Loading

Uh oh!

TimDiekmann left a comment

Uh oh!

github-actions Bot commented Jul 13, 2026

@rust/hash-graph-benches – Integrations

policy_resolution_large

policy_resolution_medium

policy_resolution_none

policy_resolution_small

read_scaling_complete

read_scaling_linkless

representative_read_entity

representative_read_entity_type

representative_read_multiple_entities

scenarios

Uh oh!

TimDiekmann left a comment

Uh oh!

Reviewers

Assignees

Labels

Milestone

Development

Uh oh!

2 participants

Uh oh!

Conversation

claude Bot commented Jul 13, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

🌟 What is the purpose of this PR?

⚠️ Remaining step (required before CI can pass)

🔗 Related links

🔍 What does this change?

Pre-Merge Checklist 🚀

🚢 Has this modified a publishable library?

📜 Does this require a change to the docs?

🕸️ Does this require a change to the Turbo Graph?

⚠️ Known issues

🛡 What tests cover this?

❓ How to test this?

Uh oh!

vercel Bot commented Jul 13, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

codecov Bot commented Jul 13, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Codecov Report

Uh oh!

codspeed-hq Bot commented Jul 13, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Merging this PR will not alter performance

Uh oh!

TimDiekmann left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

github-actions Bot commented Jul 13, 2026

Benchmark results

@rust/hash-graph-benches – Integrations

policy_resolution_large

policy_resolution_medium

policy_resolution_none

policy_resolution_small

read_scaling_complete

read_scaling_linkless

representative_read_entity

representative_read_entity_type

representative_read_multiple_entities

scenarios

Uh oh!

TimDiekmann left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Reviewers

Assignees

Labels

Milestone

Development

Uh oh!

2 participants

claude Bot commented Jul 13, 2026 •

edited

Loading

vercel Bot commented Jul 13, 2026 •

edited

Loading

codecov Bot commented Jul 13, 2026 •

edited

Loading

codspeed-hq Bot commented Jul 13, 2026 •

edited

Loading