Update opentelemetry Rust crates

[hash-worker]

This PR contains the following updates:

Package	Type	Update	Change
opentelemetry (source)	workspace.dependencies	minor	0.30.0 -> 0.31.0
opentelemetry-appender-tracing (source)	workspace.dependencies	minor	0.30.1 -> 0.31.0
opentelemetry-otlp (source)	workspace.dependencies	minor	0.30.0 -> 0.31.0
opentelemetry-semantic-conventions (source)	workspace.dependencies	minor	0.30.0 -> 0.31.0
opentelemetry_sdk (source)	workspace.dependencies	minor	0.30.0 -> 0.31.0
tracing-opentelemetry	workspace.dependencies	minor	0.31.0 -> 0.32.0

---

Warning

Some dependencies could not be looked up. Check the Dependency Dashboard for more information.

---

Release Notes

open-telemetry/opentelemetry-rust (opentelemetry)

v0.31.0

Compare Source

Released 2025-Sep-25

• Breaking Change return type of opentelemetry::global::set_tracer_provider to Unit to align with metrics counterpart
• Add get_all method to opentelemetry::propagation::Extractor to return all values of the given propagation key and provide a default implementation.
• Add an IntoIterator implementation for opentelemetry::trace::TraceState to allow iterating through its key-value pair collection.

open-telemetry/opentelemetry-rust (opentelemetry-appender-tracing)

v0.31.1

Released 2025-Oct-1

• Bump tracing-opentelemetry to 0.32

v0.31.0

Released 2025-Sep-25

• Updated opentelemetry dependency to version 0.31.0.

open-telemetry/opentelemetry-rust (opentelemetry-otlp)

v0.31.0

Compare Source

Released 2025-Sep-25

• Update opentelemetry-proto and opentelemetry-http dependency version to 0.31.0
• Add HTTP compression support with gzip-http and zstd-http feature flags
• Add retry with exponential backoff and throttling support for HTTP and gRPC exporters
  This behaviour is opt in via the experimental-grpc-retry and experimental-http-retry flags on this crate. You can customize the retry policy using the with_retry_policy on the exporter builders.

open-telemetry/opentelemetry-rust (opentelemetry-semantic-conventions)

v0.31.0

Compare Source

Released 2025-Sep-25

• Update to v1.34.0 of the semantic conventions.

open-telemetry/opentelemetry-rust (opentelemetry_sdk)

v0.31.0

Compare Source

Released 2025-Sep-25

• Updated opentelemetry and opentelemetry-http dependencies to version 0.31.0.

• Feature: Add span flags support for isRemote property in OTLP exporter (#​3153)

• Updated span and link transformations to properly set flags field (0x100 for local, 0x300 for remote)

• TODO: Placeholder for Span processor related things

  • Fix SpanProcessor::on_start is no longer called on non recording spans

• Fix: Restore true parallel exports in the async-native BatchSpanProcessor by honoring OTEL_BSP_MAX_CONCURRENT_EXPORTS (#​2959). A regression in #​2685 inadvertently awaited the export() future directly in opentelemetry-sdk/src/trace/span_processor_with_async_runtime.rs instead of spawning it on the runtime, forcing all exports to run sequentially.

• Feature: Added Clone implementation to SdkLogger for API consistency with SdkTracer (#​3058).

• Fix: batch size accounting in BatchSpanProcessor when queue is full (#​3089).

• Fix: Resolved dependency issue where the "logs" feature incorrectly
  required the "trace" feature flag
  (#​3096).
  The logs functionality now operates independently, while automatic correlation
  between logs and traces continues to work when the "trace" feature is
  explicitly enabled.

• Fix: Fix shutdown of SimpleLogProcessor and async BatchLogProcessor.

• Default implementation of LogProcessor::shutdown_with_timeout() will now warn to encourage users to implement proper shutdown.

tokio-rs/tracing-opentelemetry (tracing-opentelemetry)

v0.32.0

Compare Source

Added

• Add configuration for including target in spans (#​222)

Changed

• OpenTelemetry context activation (#​202)
  • Trace ID and span ID can be obtained from OtelData via dedicated functions. Note that these
    will be available only if the context has already been built. (#​233)
• Correctly track entered and exited state for timings (#​212)
• Slightly improve error message on version mismatch (#​211)
• Remove Lazy for thread_local static (#​215)
• Update description of special fields and semantic conventions

Breaking Changes

• The attributes code.filepath, code.lineno, and code.namespace have been renamed to
  code.file.path, and code.line.number, and code.module.name, to align with the opentelemetry
  semantic conventions for code. (#​225)
• Upgrade from opentelemetry to 0.31.0. Refer to the upstream
  changelog
  for more information. (#​230)
• Hold onto MetricsProvider in MetricsLayer (#​224)
• The attribute otel.status_message was changed to otel.status_description to align with the
  opentelemetry semantic conventions for code. (#​209)
• Remove the metrics_gauge_unstable feature.

---

Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - "before 4am every weekday,every weekend" (UTC), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Enabled.

♻ Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

👻 Immortal: This PR will be recreated if closed unmerged. Get config help if that's undesired.

---

• If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

---

This PR has been generated by Renovate Bot.

[hash-worker]

⚠️ Artifact update problem

Renovate failed to update an artifact related to this branch. You probably do not want to merge this PR as-is.

♻ Renovate will retry this branch, including artifacts, only when one of the following happens:

• any of the package files in this branch needs updating, or
• the branch becomes conflicted, or
• you click the rebase/retry checkbox if found above, or
• you rename this PR's title to start with "rebase!" to trigger it manually

The artifact failure details are included below:

File name: Cargo.lock

Command failed: cargo update --config net.git-fetch-with-cli=true --manifest-path Cargo.toml --package [email protected] --precise 0.31.0
    Updating crates.io index
error: failed to select a version for the requirement `opentelemetry = "^0.30.0"`
candidate versions found which didn't match: 0.31.0
location searched: crates.io index
required by package `tarpc v0.36.0 (https://github.com/google/tarpc?rev=f55f36d2d876b1868cfcf52f41d0456a60cf726c#f55f36d2)`
    ... which satisfies git dependency `tarpc` (locked to 0.36.0) of package `hash-graph v0.0.0 (/tmp/renovate/repos/github/hashintel/hash/apps/hash-graph)`

[github-actions]

Benchmark results

@rust/hash-graph-benches – Integrations

policy_resolution_large

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 2002	$$28.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 141 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.041 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.30 \mathrm{ms} \pm 14.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.588 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 1001	$$13.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 75.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.11 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 3314	$$43.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 299 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.256 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$14.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 108 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.457 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 1526	$$24.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 138 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.192 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 2078	$$28.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 151 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-38.946 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.71 \mathrm{ms} \pm 17.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}4.68 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 1033	$$15.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 89.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-50.210 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

policy_resolution_medium

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 102	$$3.64 \mathrm{ms} \pm 17.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-4.646 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.77 \mathrm{ms} \pm 13.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-5.447 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 51	$$3.16 \mathrm{ms} \pm 15.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-4.912 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 269	$$5.12 \mathrm{ms} \pm 29.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.430 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.36 \mathrm{ms} \pm 12.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-4.751 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 107	$$3.94 \mathrm{ms} \pm 15.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-4.566 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 133	$$4.35 \mathrm{ms} \pm 25.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-4.434 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.26 \mathrm{ms} \pm 13.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-6.254 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 63	$$3.88 \mathrm{ms} \pm 16.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-4.182 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

policy_resolution_none

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 2	$$2.51 \mathrm{ms} \pm 10.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.65 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.49 \mathrm{ms} \pm 15.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.80 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 1	$$2.56 \mathrm{ms} \pm 11.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.77 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 8	$$2.74 \mathrm{ms} \pm 14.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.561 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.63 \mathrm{ms} \pm 12.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.90 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 3	$$2.82 \mathrm{ms} \pm 11.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.786 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

policy_resolution_small

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 52	$$2.98 \mathrm{ms} \pm 13.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}7.44 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.69 \mathrm{ms} \pm 13.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}9.47 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 25	$$2.85 \mathrm{ms} \pm 12.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}10.4 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 94	$$3.39 \mathrm{ms} \pm 18.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}7.15 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.91 \mathrm{ms} \pm 14.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}8.29 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 26	$$3.17 \mathrm{ms} \pm 18.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}9.22 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 66	$$3.24 \mathrm{ms} \pm 17.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}5.82 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.87 \mathrm{ms} \pm 13.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}7.61 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 29	$$3.16 \mathrm{ms} \pm 20.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}8.25 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

read_scaling_complete

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id;one_depth	1 entities	$$38.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 151 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.491 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	10 entities	$$86.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 347 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.037 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	25 entities	$$43.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 175 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.409 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	5 entities	$$46.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 208 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.04 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	50 entities	$$54.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 260 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.959 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	1 entities	$$40.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 184 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.510 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	10 entities	$$495 \mathrm{ms} \pm 1.05 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{gray}-1.742 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	25 entities	$$94.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 468 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.551 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	5 entities	$$83.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 379 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.477 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	50 entities	$$291 \mathrm{ms} \pm 865 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.445 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	1 entities	$$14.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 79.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.533 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	10 entities	$$15.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 86.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.69 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	25 entities	$$15.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 72.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.270 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	5 entities	$$15.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 80.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.086 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	50 entities	$$18.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 135 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.606 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

read_scaling_linkless

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	1 entities	$$15.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 82.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.78 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	10 entities	$$14.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 77.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.347 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	100 entities	$$15.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 72.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.229 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	1000 entities	$$15.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 85.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.72 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	10000 entities	$$22.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 144 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.559 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_entity

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/block/v/1	$$30.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 263 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.67 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/book/v/1	$$29.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 293 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.244 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/building/v/1	$$31.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 290 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.02 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/organization/v/1	$$30.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 295 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.915 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/page/v/2	$$29.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 275 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-5.285 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/person/v/1	$$31.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 310 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}4.02 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/playlist/v/1	$$30.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 302 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.489 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/song/v/1	$$30.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 290 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.53 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/uk-address/v/1	$$30.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 308 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.673 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_entity_type

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
get_entity_type_by_id	Account ID: bf5a9ef5-dc3b-43cf-a291-6210c0321eba	$$9.12 \mathrm{ms} \pm 40.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.015 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_multiple_entities

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=0	0	$$57.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 338 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.388 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=255	1,resolve_depths=inherit:1;values:255;properties:255;links:127;link_dests:126;type:true	$$110 \mathrm{ms} \pm 376 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.708 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:0;link_dests:0;type:false	$$63.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 337 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.062 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$72.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 369 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.158 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$82.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 343 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.779 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:2;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$88.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 309 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.168 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=0	0	$$52.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 336 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.773 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=255	1,resolve_depths=inherit:1;values:255;properties:255;links:127;link_dests:126;type:true	$$80.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 334 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.206 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:0;link_dests:0;type:false	$$58.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 346 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.716 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$67.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 351 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.328 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$69.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 361 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.480 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:2;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$70.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 414 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.380 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$

scenarios

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
full_test	query-limited	$$143 \mathrm{ms} \pm 557 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}5.78 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
full_test	query-unlimited	$$138 \mathrm{ms} \pm 428 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.52 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
linked_queries	query-limited	$$43.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 190 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-58.558 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
linked_queries	query-unlimited	$$580 \mathrm{ms} \pm 1.07 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{lightgreen}-5.860 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

[vercel]

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

Project	Deployment	Preview	Updated (UTC)
petrinaut	Error		Nov 19, 2025 1:51pm

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 55.85%. Comparing base (6f35d2f) to head (3750c33).
⚠️ Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #8013      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   55.85%   55.85%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files        1142     1142              
  Lines      105678   105678              
  Branches     4826     4826              
==========================================
- Hits        59026    59024       -2     
- Misses      45957    45959       +2     
  Partials      695      695              

Flag	Coverage Δ
apps.hash-ai-worker-ts	1.32% <ø> (ø)
apps.hash-api	0.00% <ø> (ø)
blockprotocol.type-system	40.84% <ø> (ø)
local.claude-hooks	0.00% <ø> (ø)
local.harpc-client	51.24% <ø> (ø)
local.hash-graph-sdk	10.88% <ø> (ø)
local.hash-isomorphic-utils	0.00% <ø> (ø)
rust.antsi	0.00% <ø> (ø)
rust.error-stack	90.85% <ø> (ø)
rust.harpc-codec	84.22% <ø> (ø)
rust.harpc-net	96.08% <ø> (-0.04%)	⬇️
rust.harpc-tower	66.80% <ø> (ø)
rust.harpc-types	0.00% <ø> (ø)
rust.harpc-wire-protocol	92.23% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-codec	71.25% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-api	2.89% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-authorization	62.50% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-postgres-store	25.62% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-store	30.70% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-temporal-versioning	47.68% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-types	0.00% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-validation	83.29% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-ast	87.17% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-compiletest	48.96% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-core	81.01% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-diagnostics	72.28% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-eval	68.56% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-hir	88.92% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-mir	54.38% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-syntax-jexpr	93.94% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
• 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.