Update Rust toolchains to nightly-2025-11-03

[hash-worker]

This PR contains the following updates:

Package	Update	Change
rust	minor	2025-10-28 -> 2025-11-03

---

Warning

Some dependencies could not be looked up. Check the Dependency Dashboard for more information.

---

Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - "before 11am" (UTC), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Enabled.

♻ Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.

---

• If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

---

This PR has been generated by Renovate Bot.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 56.00%. Comparing base (519794b) to head (94f96d2).
⚠️ Report is 5 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #8000      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   55.80%   56.00%   +0.20%     
==========================================
  Files        1117     1119       +2     
  Lines      101979   102451     +472     
  Branches     4742     4755      +13     
==========================================
+ Hits        56911    57381     +470     
+ Misses      44403    44398       -5     
- Partials      665      672       +7     

Flag	Coverage Δ
apps.hash-ai-worker-ts	1.32% <ø> (ø)
apps.hash-api	0.00% <ø> (ø)
blockprotocol.type-system	40.84% <ø> (ø)
local.hash-backend-utils	4.08% <ø> (ø)
local.hash-graph-sdk	10.88% <ø> (ø)
local.hash-isomorphic-utils	0.00% <ø> (ø)
rust.error-stack	90.85% <ø> (ø)
rust.harpc-codec	84.22% <ø> (ø)
rust.harpc-net	96.08% <ø> (-0.04%)	⬇️
rust.harpc-tower	66.80% <ø> (ø)
rust.harpc-wire-protocol	92.23% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-codec	71.25% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-api	2.89% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-authorization	62.50% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-postgres-store	25.58% <ø> (+2.25%)	⬆️
rust.hash-graph-store	30.70% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-temporal-versioning	47.68% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-types	0.00% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-validation	83.29% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-ast	87.17% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-compiletest	53.03% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-core	81.27% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-eval	68.56% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-hir	90.29% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-syntax-jexpr	93.94% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
• 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

[hash-worker]

Edited/Blocked Notification

Renovate will not automatically rebase this PR, because it does not recognize the last commit author and assumes somebody else may have edited the PR.

You can manually request rebase by checking the rebase/retry box above.

⚠️ Warning: custom changes will be lost.

[graphite-app]

Graphite Automations

"Request error-stack reviewers once CI passes" took an action on this PR • (11/03/25)

1 reviewer was added to this PR based on Tim Diekmann's automation.

"Request backend reviewers once CI passes" took an action on this PR • (11/03/25)

1 reviewer was added to this PR based on Tim Diekmann's automation.

"Request Rust reviewers once CI passes" took an action on this PR • (11/03/25)

1 reviewer was added to this PR based on Tim Diekmann's automation.

[github-actions]

Benchmark results

@rust/hash-graph-benches – Integrations

policy_resolution_large

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 2002	$$27.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 141 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.901 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.23 \mathrm{ms} \pm 11.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.404 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 1001	$$12.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 79.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.957 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 3314	$$43.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 335 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.41 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$13.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 73.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.345 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 1526	$$23.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 134 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.719 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 2078	$$27.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 140 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-40.011 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.64 \mathrm{ms} \pm 21.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-78.440 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 1033	$$11.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 80.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-64.830 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

policy_resolution_medium

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 102	$$3.63 \mathrm{ms} \pm 13.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.581 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.78 \mathrm{ms} \pm 14.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.416 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 51	$$3.19 \mathrm{ms} \pm 16.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.254 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 269	$$5.08 \mathrm{ms} \pm 31.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.486 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.34 \mathrm{ms} \pm 13.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.107 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 107	$$4.00 \mathrm{ms} \pm 25.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.685 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 133	$$4.29 \mathrm{ms} \pm 24.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.284 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.25 \mathrm{ms} \pm 13.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.065 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 63	$$3.89 \mathrm{ms} \pm 20.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.947 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

policy_resolution_none

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 2	$$2.47 \mathrm{ms} \pm 7.86 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}4.22 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.45 \mathrm{ms} \pm 9.18 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}5.01 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 1	$$2.55 \mathrm{ms} \pm 14.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}5.11 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 8	$$2.71 \mathrm{ms} \pm 10.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.42 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.61 \mathrm{ms} \pm 11.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}4.65 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 3	$$2.80 \mathrm{ms} \pm 12.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.79 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

policy_resolution_small

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 52	$$2.94 \mathrm{ms} \pm 11.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}5.98 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.60 \mathrm{ms} \pm 10.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}7.44 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 25	$$2.85 \mathrm{ms} \pm 21.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}10.8 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 94	$$3.40 \mathrm{ms} \pm 16.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}10.4 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.81 \mathrm{ms} \pm 10.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}5.31 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 26	$$3.08 \mathrm{ms} \pm 15.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}7.33 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 66	$$3.34 \mathrm{ms} \pm 24.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}10.5 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.77 \mathrm{ms} \pm 11.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.27 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 29	$$3.11 \mathrm{ms} \pm 17.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}8.65 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

read_scaling_complete

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id;one_depth	1 entities	$$38.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 164 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.11 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	10 entities	$$84.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 460 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.53 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	25 entities	$$42.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 168 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.990 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	5 entities	$$45.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 258 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.32 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	50 entities	$$55.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 382 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}5.45 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	1 entities	$$39.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 172 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.305 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	10 entities	$$495 \mathrm{ms} \pm 901 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.697 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	25 entities	$$98.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 396 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.622 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	5 entities	$$82.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 325 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.461 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	50 entities	$$323 \mathrm{ms} \pm 867 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.15 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	1 entities	$$14.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 54.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.652 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	10 entities	$$15.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 84.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.86 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	25 entities	$$15.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 84.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.82 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	5 entities	$$14.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 65.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.90 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	50 entities	$$18.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 100 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.82 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

read_scaling_linkless

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	1 entities	$$14.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 72.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.46 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	10 entities	$$14.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 67.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.73 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	100 entities	$$14.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 63.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.63 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	1000 entities	$$15.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 66.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.08 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	10000 entities	$$22.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 129 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.387 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_entity

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/block/v/1	$$30.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 272 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.825 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/book/v/1	$$29.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 300 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.899 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/building/v/1	$$30.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 255 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.36 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/organization/v/1	$$31.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 278 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}6.01 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/page/v/2	$$28.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 265 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-4.919 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/person/v/1	$$30.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 380 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}4.81 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/playlist/v/1	$$29.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 308 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.582 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/song/v/1	$$30.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 299 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.778 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/uk-address/v/1	$$30.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 244 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.174 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_entity_type

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
get_entity_type_by_id	Account ID: bf5a9ef5-dc3b-43cf-a291-6210c0321eba	$$8.93 \mathrm{ms} \pm 50.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.531 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_multiple_entities

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=0	0	$$56.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 278 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.099 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=255	1,resolve_depths=inherit:1;values:255;properties:255;links:127;link_dests:126;type:true	$$108 \mathrm{ms} \pm 432 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.124 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:0;link_dests:0;type:false	$$63.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 418 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.08 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$71.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 298 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.002 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$79.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 362 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.029 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:2;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$88.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 441 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.10 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=0	0	$$52.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 369 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.91 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=255	1,resolve_depths=inherit:1;values:255;properties:255;links:127;link_dests:126;type:true	$$80.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 311 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.64 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:0;link_dests:0;type:false	$$58.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 387 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.11 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$66.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 427 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.792 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$68.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 276 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.121 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:2;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$70.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 398 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.013 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$

scenarios

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
full_test	query-limited	$$130 \mathrm{ms} \pm 606 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.998 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
full_test	query-unlimited	$$132 \mathrm{ms} \pm 512 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.654 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
linked_queries	query-limited	$$42.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 163 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-58.908 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
linked_queries	query-unlimited	$$576 \mathrm{ms} \pm 1.05 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{gray}-3.838 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph