Update Rust crate uuid to v1.18.1

[hash-worker]

This PR contains the following updates:

Package	Type	Update	Change
uuid	workspace.dependencies	patch	=1.18.0 -> =1.18.1

---

Warning

Some dependencies could not be looked up. Check the Dependency Dashboard for more information.

---

Release Notes

uuid-rs/uuid (uuid)

v1.18.1

Compare Source

What's Changed

• Unsafe cleanup by @​KodrAus in #​841
• Prepare for 1.18.1 release by @​KodrAus in #​842

Full Changelog: uuid-rs/uuid@v1.18.0...v1.18.1

---

Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - "before 4am every weekday,every weekend" (UTC), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Enabled.

♻ Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.

---

• If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

---

This PR has been generated by Renovate Bot.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 55.77%. Comparing base (de3ee86) to head (1b00728).
⚠️ Report is 24 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #7987      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   55.66%   55.77%   +0.10%     
==========================================
  Files        1112     1116       +4     
  Lines      101195   101509     +314     
  Branches     4690     4701      +11     
==========================================
+ Hits        56329    56615     +286     
- Misses      44205    44229      +24     
- Partials      661      665       +4     

Flag	Coverage Δ
apps.hash-ai-worker-ts	1.32% <ø> (ø)
apps.hash-api	0.00% <ø> (ø)
blockprotocol.type-system	40.84% <ø> (ø)
local.harpc-client	51.24% <ø> (ø)
local.hash-backend-utils	4.08% <ø> (+<0.01%)	⬆️
local.hash-graph-sdk	10.88% <ø> (ø)
local.hash-isomorphic-utils	0.00% <ø> (ø)
rust.antsi	0.00% <ø> (ø)
rust.error-stack	90.85% <ø> (ø)
rust.harpc-codec	84.22% <ø> (ø)
rust.harpc-net	96.08% <ø> (ø)
rust.harpc-tower	66.80% <ø> (ø)
rust.harpc-types	0.00% <ø> (ø)
rust.harpc-wire-protocol	92.23% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-codec	71.25% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-api	2.89% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-authorization	62.50% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-postgres-store	21.83% <ø> (+1.45%)	⬆️
rust.hash-graph-store	30.70% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-temporal-versioning	47.68% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-types	0.00% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-validation	83.29% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-ast	87.17% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-compiletest	53.03% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-core	81.27% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-diagnostics	72.28% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-eval	68.56% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-hir	90.29% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-syntax-jexpr	93.94% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
• 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

[graphite-app]

Graphite Automations

"Request Rust reviewers once CI passes" took an action on this PR • (11/02/25)

1 reviewer was added to this PR based on Tim Diekmann's automation.

[github-actions]

Benchmark results

@rust/hash-graph-benches – Integrations

policy_resolution_large

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 2002	$$27.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 162 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-8.934 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.26 \mathrm{ms} \pm 11.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-7.970 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 1001	$$12.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 92.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-16.663 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 3314	$$42.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 347 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-9.252 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$14.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 95.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-11.171 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 1526	$$23.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 128 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-11.257 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 2078	$$28.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 159 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-41.418 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.66 \mathrm{ms} \pm 19.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-61.177 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 1033	$$14.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 104 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-54.761 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

policy_resolution_medium

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 102	$$3.77 \mathrm{ms} \pm 18.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.020 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.90 \mathrm{ms} \pm 12.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.972 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 51	$$3.38 \mathrm{ms} \pm 19.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.57 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 269	$$5.32 \mathrm{ms} \pm 28.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.18 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.44 \mathrm{ms} \pm 14.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.441 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 107	$$4.12 \mathrm{ms} \pm 21.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.33 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 133	$$4.46 \mathrm{ms} \pm 24.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}7.29 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.45 \mathrm{ms} \pm 15.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.78 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 63	$$4.05 \mathrm{ms} \pm 20.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.45 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

policy_resolution_none

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 2	$$2.56 \mathrm{ms} \pm 11.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.012 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.51 \mathrm{ms} \pm 11.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-4.599 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 1	$$2.59 \mathrm{ms} \pm 13.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.658 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 8	$$2.76 \mathrm{ms} \pm 10.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.094 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.72 \mathrm{ms} \pm 11.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.803 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 3	$$2.83 \mathrm{ms} \pm 12.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.001 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

policy_resolution_small

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 52	$$2.95 \mathrm{ms} \pm 11.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.91 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.66 \mathrm{ms} \pm 11.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}6.11 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 25	$$2.78 \mathrm{ms} \pm 11.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.27 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 94	$$3.32 \mathrm{ms} \pm 16.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-12.009 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.92 \mathrm{ms} \pm 14.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}8.99 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 26	$$3.17 \mathrm{ms} \pm 18.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}5.90 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 66	$$3.31 \mathrm{ms} \pm 22.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}4.15 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.83 \mathrm{ms} \pm 15.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.52 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 29	$$3.07 \mathrm{ms} \pm 14.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.582 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

read_scaling_complete

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id;one_depth	1 entities	$$38.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 181 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.712 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	10 entities	$$84.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 401 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-5.174 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	25 entities	$$42.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 175 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-4.400 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	5 entities	$$47.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 177 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.100 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	50 entities	$$53.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 308 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.496 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	1 entities	$$39.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 162 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-6.938 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	10 entities	$$489 \mathrm{ms} \pm 815 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.184 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	25 entities	$$99.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 446 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.814 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	5 entities	$$82.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 418 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.262 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	50 entities	$$321 \mathrm{ms} \pm 1.03 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{red}9.47 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	1 entities	$$15.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 66.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}7.08 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	10 entities	$$15.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 76.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.95 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	25 entities	$$15.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 80.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}4.08 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	5 entities	$$15.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 85.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}6.84 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	50 entities	$$18.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 144 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}6.19 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

read_scaling_linkless

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	1 entities	$$14.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 78.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.612 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	10 entities	$$14.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 80.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.390 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	100 entities	$$15.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 84.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.15 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	1000 entities	$$16.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 81.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.27 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	10000 entities	$$22.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 154 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.959 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_entity

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/block/v/1	$$30.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 295 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.102 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/book/v/1	$$31.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 362 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.30 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/building/v/1	$$30.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 308 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.453 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/organization/v/1	$$31.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 299 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.93 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/page/v/2	$$30.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 278 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.98 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/person/v/1	$$30.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 252 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.81 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/playlist/v/1	$$29.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 257 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.742 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/song/v/1	$$30.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 259 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.358 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/uk-address/v/1	$$31.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 300 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}7.69 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_entity_type

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
get_entity_type_by_id	Account ID: bf5a9ef5-dc3b-43cf-a291-6210c0321eba	$$9.24 \mathrm{ms} \pm 44.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.80 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_multiple_entities

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=0	0	$$57.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 231 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-5.070 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=255	1,resolve_depths=inherit:1;values:255;properties:255;links:127;link_dests:126;type:true	$$114 \mathrm{ms} \pm 413 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.442 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:0;link_dests:0;type:false	$$64.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 354 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.545 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$73.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 408 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.151 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$82.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 377 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.278 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:2;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$89.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 337 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.432 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=0	0	$$54.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 254 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.652 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=255	1,resolve_depths=inherit:1;values:255;properties:255;links:127;link_dests:126;type:true	$$84.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 346 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.978 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:0;link_dests:0;type:false	$$61.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 426 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.465 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$71.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 401 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.491 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$74.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 402 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.222 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:2;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$73.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 353 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.39 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$

scenarios

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
full_test	query-limited	$$146 \mathrm{ms} \pm 608 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.828 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
full_test	query-unlimited	$$139 \mathrm{ms} \pm 460 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.122 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
linked_queries	query-limited	$$45.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 225 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-57.359 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
linked_queries	query-unlimited	$$588 \mathrm{ms} \pm 901 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-5.241 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph