Update Rust crate unicode-normalization to v0.1.25

[hash-worker]

This PR contains the following updates:

Package	Type	Update	Change
unicode-normalization	workspace.dependencies	patch	=0.1.24 -> =0.1.25

---

Warning

Some dependencies could not be looked up. Check the Dependency Dashboard for more information.

---

Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - "before 4am every weekday,every weekend" (UTC), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Enabled.

♻ Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.

---

• If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

---

This PR has been generated by Renovate Bot.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 55.77%. Comparing base (6972d00) to head (1aca691).
⚠️ Report is 3 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #7985   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   55.77%   55.77%           
=======================================
  Files        1116     1116           
  Lines      101509   101509           
  Branches     4701     4701           
=======================================
+ Hits        56617    56618    +1     
+ Misses      44227    44226    -1     
  Partials      665      665           

Flag	Coverage Δ
apps.hash-ai-worker-ts	1.32% <ø> (ø)
apps.hash-api	0.00% <ø> (ø)
blockprotocol.type-system	40.84% <ø> (ø)
local.harpc-client	51.24% <ø> (ø)
local.hash-backend-utils	4.08% <ø> (ø)
local.hash-graph-sdk	10.88% <ø> (ø)
local.hash-isomorphic-utils	0.00% <ø> (ø)
rust.antsi	0.00% <ø> (ø)
rust.error-stack	90.85% <ø> (ø)
rust.harpc-codec	84.22% <ø> (ø)
rust.harpc-net	96.13% <ø> (+0.01%)	⬆️
rust.harpc-tower	66.80% <ø> (ø)
rust.harpc-types	0.00% <ø> (ø)
rust.harpc-wire-protocol	92.23% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-codec	71.25% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-api	2.89% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-authorization	62.50% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-postgres-store	21.83% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-store	30.70% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-temporal-versioning	47.68% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-types	0.00% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-validation	83.29% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-ast	87.17% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-compiletest	53.03% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-core	81.27% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-diagnostics	72.28% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-eval	68.56% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-hir	90.29% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-syntax-jexpr	93.94% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
• 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

[github-actions]

Benchmark results

@rust/hash-graph-benches – Integrations

policy_resolution_large

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 2002	$$27.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 148 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-42.926 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.77 \mathrm{ms} \pm 13.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.855 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 1001	$$12.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 54.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-48.619 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 3314	$$38.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 273 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.57 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$11.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 50.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.592 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 1526	$$21.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 128 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.878 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 2078	$$27.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 129 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-46.092 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.14 \mathrm{ms} \pm 14.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-85.604 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 1033	$$14.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 73.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-57.517 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

policy_resolution_medium

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 102	$$3.22 \mathrm{ms} \pm 20.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.888 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.37 \mathrm{ms} \pm 10.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.13 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 51	$$2.73 \mathrm{ms} \pm 11.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.120 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 269	$$4.58 \mathrm{ms} \pm 19.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.60 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.95 \mathrm{ms} \pm 13.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.82 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 107	$$3.50 \mathrm{ms} \pm 22.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.72 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 133	$$3.86 \mathrm{ms} \pm 19.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}9.10 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.80 \mathrm{ms} \pm 14.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.080 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 63	$$3.33 \mathrm{ms} \pm 18.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.235 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

policy_resolution_none

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 2	$$2.08 \mathrm{ms} \pm 10.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}5.03 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.09 \mathrm{ms} \pm 11.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}4.07 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 1	$$2.15 \mathrm{ms} \pm 11.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}6.12 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 8	$$2.33 \mathrm{ms} \pm 11.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}5.29 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.21 \mathrm{ms} \pm 11.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}6.01 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 3	$$2.32 \mathrm{ms} \pm 9.31 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.30 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

policy_resolution_small

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 52	$$2.49 \mathrm{ms} \pm 14.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}4.70 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.15 \mathrm{ms} \pm 10.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}8.79 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 25	$$2.35 \mathrm{ms} \pm 15.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}9.87 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 94	$$2.73 \mathrm{ms} \pm 11.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.50 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.35 \mathrm{ms} \pm 8.84 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}5.54 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 26	$$2.54 \mathrm{ms} \pm 10.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}5.20 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 66	$$2.73 \mathrm{ms} \pm 12.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}8.04 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.31 \mathrm{ms} \pm 9.29 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}7.74 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 29	$$2.53 \mathrm{ms} \pm 10.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}5.90 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

read_scaling_complete

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id;one_depth	1 entities	$$34.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 176 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.623 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	10 entities	$$80.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 435 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.401 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	25 entities	$$37.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 197 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.96 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	5 entities	$$41.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 184 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.126 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	50 entities	$$48.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 216 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.227 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	1 entities	$$35.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 157 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.13 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	10 entities	$$481 \mathrm{ms} \pm 1.03 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{gray}-0.879 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	25 entities	$$91.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 391 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.47 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	5 entities	$$85.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 414 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.730 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	50 entities	$$274 \mathrm{ms} \pm 749 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-9.303 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	1 entities	$$12.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 64.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}4.03 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	10 entities	$$12.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 64.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.129 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	25 entities	$$13.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 75.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.03 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	5 entities	$$13.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 70.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.82 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	50 entities	$$16.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 81.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.78 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

read_scaling_linkless

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	1 entities	$$12.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 57.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.92 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	10 entities	$$12.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 52.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.29 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	100 entities	$$12.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 59.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.839 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	1000 entities	$$13.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 70.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.61 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	10000 entities	$$20.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 154 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.94 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_entity

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/block/v/1	$$28.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 331 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.28 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/book/v/1	$$28.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 315 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.990 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/building/v/1	$$28.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 300 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.05 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/organization/v/1	$$27.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 295 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.159 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/page/v/2	$$27.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 336 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.992 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/person/v/1	$$27.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 298 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.430 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/playlist/v/1	$$28.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 328 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.267 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/song/v/1	$$27.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 295 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.97 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/uk-address/v/1	$$27.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 281 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.737 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_entity_type

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
get_entity_type_by_id	Account ID: bf5a9ef5-dc3b-43cf-a291-6210c0321eba	$$7.66 \mathrm{ms} \pm 50.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.70 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_multiple_entities

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=0	0	$$57.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 335 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.05 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=255	1,resolve_depths=inherit:1;values:255;properties:255;links:127;link_dests:126;type:true	$$99.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 296 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.262 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:0;link_dests:0;type:false	$$62.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 337 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.67 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$69.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 291 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.029 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$76.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 340 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.221 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:2;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$83.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 399 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.06 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=0	0	$$50.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 199 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.146 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=255	1,resolve_depths=inherit:1;values:255;properties:255;links:127;link_dests:126;type:true	$$74.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 257 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.037 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:0;link_dests:0;type:false	$$56.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 265 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.665 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$63.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 313 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.689 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$65.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 333 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.687 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:2;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$66.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 349 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.32 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$

scenarios

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
full_test	query-limited	$$127 \mathrm{ms} \pm 636 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.02 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
full_test	query-unlimited	$$126 \mathrm{ms} \pm 568 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.30 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
linked_queries	query-limited	$$38.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 162 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-50.921 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
linked_queries	query-unlimited	$$518 \mathrm{ms} \pm 820 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.405 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

[graphite-app]

Graphite Automations

"Request Rust reviewers once CI passes" took an action on this PR • (11/02/25)

1 reviewer was added to this PR based on Tim Diekmann's automation.