Update Rust crate smol_str to v0.3.4

[hash-worker]

This PR contains the following updates:

Package	Type	Update	Change
smol_str	workspace.dependencies	patch	=0.3.2 -> =0.3.4

---

Warning

Some dependencies could not be looked up. Check the Dependency Dashboard for more information.

---

Release Notes

rust-analyzer/smol_str (smol_str)

v0.3.4

Compare Source

• Added rust-version field to Cargo.toml

v0.3.3

Compare Source

• Optimise StrExt::to_ascii_lowercase_smolstr, StrExt::to_ascii_uppercase_smolstr
  ~2x speedup inline, ~4-22x for heap.
• Optimise StrExt::to_lowercase_smolstr, StrExt::to_uppercase_smolstr ~2x speedup inline, ~5-50x for heap.
• Optimise StrExt::replace_smolstr, StrExt::replacen_smolstr for single ascii replace,
  ~3x speedup inline & heap.

---

Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - "before 4am every weekday,every weekend" (UTC), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Enabled.

♻ Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.

---

• If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

---

This PR has been generated by Renovate Bot.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 55.66%. Comparing base (de3ee86) to head (3cc1f03).
⚠️ Report is 10 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #7975   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   55.66%   55.66%           
=======================================
  Files        1112     1113    +1     
  Lines      101195   101194    -1     
  Branches     4690     4691    +1     
=======================================
  Hits        56329    56329           
+ Misses      44205    44204    -1     
  Partials      661      661           

Flag	Coverage Δ
apps.hash-ai-worker-ts	1.32% <ø> (ø)
apps.hash-api	0.00% <ø> (ø)
blockprotocol.type-system	40.84% <ø> (ø)
local.harpc-client	51.24% <ø> (ø)
local.hash-backend-utils	4.08% <ø> (+<0.01%)	⬆️
local.hash-graph-sdk	10.88% <ø> (ø)
local.hash-isomorphic-utils	0.00% <ø> (ø)
rust.antsi	0.00% <ø> (ø)
rust.error-stack	90.85% <ø> (ø)
rust.harpc-codec	84.22% <ø> (ø)
rust.harpc-net	96.08% <ø> (ø)
rust.harpc-tower	66.80% <ø> (ø)
rust.harpc-types	0.00% <ø> (ø)
rust.harpc-wire-protocol	92.23% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-codec	71.25% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-api	2.89% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-authorization	62.50% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-postgres-store	20.38% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-store	30.70% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-temporal-versioning	47.68% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-types	0.00% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-validation	83.29% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-ast	87.17% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-compiletest	53.03% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-core	81.27% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-diagnostics	72.28% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-eval	68.56% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-hir	90.29% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-syntax-jexpr	93.94% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
• 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

[graphite-app]

Graphite Automations

"Request Rust reviewers once CI passes" took an action on this PR • (11/01/25)

1 reviewer was added to this PR based on Tim Diekmann's automation.

[github-actions]

Benchmark results

@rust/hash-graph-benches – Integrations

policy_resolution_large

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 2002	$$28.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 132 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.246 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.25 \mathrm{ms} \pm 15.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.23 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 1001	$$12.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 80.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.748 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 3314	$$42.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 333 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.856 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$14.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 173 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}5.20 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 1526	$$24.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 147 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.42 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 2078	$$27.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 142 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-39.340 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.65 \mathrm{ms} \pm 17.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-81.664 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 1033	$$14.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 94.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-52.225 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

policy_resolution_medium

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 102	$$3.70 \mathrm{ms} \pm 20.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.160 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.83 \mathrm{ms} \pm 10.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.030 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 51	$$3.23 \mathrm{ms} \pm 17.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.148 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 269	$$5.09 \mathrm{ms} \pm 24.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.590 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.42 \mathrm{ms} \pm 17.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.607 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 107	$$4.01 \mathrm{ms} \pm 23.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.690 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 133	$$4.34 \mathrm{ms} \pm 21.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.077 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.33 \mathrm{ms} \pm 14.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.380 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 63	$$3.95 \mathrm{ms} \pm 19.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.16 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

policy_resolution_none

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 2	$$2.49 \mathrm{ms} \pm 10.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.78 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.46 \mathrm{ms} \pm 10.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}4.90 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 1	$$2.59 \mathrm{ms} \pm 12.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}5.79 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 8	$$2.75 \mathrm{ms} \pm 13.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.97 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.61 \mathrm{ms} \pm 9.78 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.52 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 3	$$2.87 \mathrm{ms} \pm 15.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}4.35 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

policy_resolution_small

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 52	$$2.88 \mathrm{ms} \pm 9.90 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}4.11 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.55 \mathrm{ms} \pm 10.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}6.59 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 25	$$2.75 \mathrm{ms} \pm 12.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}7.62 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 94	$$3.24 \mathrm{ms} \pm 16.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}4.45 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.79 \mathrm{ms} \pm 13.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}6.66 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 26	$$3.03 \mathrm{ms} \pm 15.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}6.59 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 66	$$3.17 \mathrm{ms} \pm 14.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}5.23 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.76 \mathrm{ms} \pm 11.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}6.62 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 29	$$3.02 \mathrm{ms} \pm 12.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}6.40 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

read_scaling_complete

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id;one_depth	1 entities	$$38.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 167 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.892 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	10 entities	$$85.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 489 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.88 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	25 entities	$$42.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 187 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.13 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	5 entities	$$45.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 194 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.42 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	50 entities	$$54.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 278 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.38 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	1 entities	$$40.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 183 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.82 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	10 entities	$$500 \mathrm{ms} \pm 1.00 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{gray}0.730 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	25 entities	$$93.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 403 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.844 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	5 entities	$$82.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 340 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.175 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	50 entities	$$288 \mathrm{ms} \pm 628 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-10.090 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	1 entities	$$14.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 72.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.275 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	10 entities	$$15.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 73.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.17 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	25 entities	$$15.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 82.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.11 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	5 entities	$$15.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 61.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.37 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	50 entities	$$17.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 95.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.34 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

read_scaling_linkless

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	1 entities	$$14.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 65.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.141 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	10 entities	$$14.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 57.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.66 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	100 entities	$$14.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 51.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.01 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	1000 entities	$$15.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 69.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.63 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	10000 entities	$$22.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 132 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.374 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_entity

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/block/v/1	$$29.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 268 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-5.065 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/book/v/1	$$31.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 307 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}7.68 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/building/v/1	$$29.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 240 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-4.666 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/organization/v/1	$$30.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 260 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-5.454 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/page/v/2	$$29.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 275 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.257 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/person/v/1	$$30.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 359 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.820 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/playlist/v/1	$$28.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 262 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-4.248 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/song/v/1	$$30.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 308 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.884 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/uk-address/v/1	$$29.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 270 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.022 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_entity_type

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
get_entity_type_by_id	Account ID: bf5a9ef5-dc3b-43cf-a291-6210c0321eba	$$9.37 \mathrm{ms} \pm 51.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}5.16 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_multiple_entities

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=0	0	$$56.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 247 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.446 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=255	1,resolve_depths=inherit:1;values:255;properties:255;links:127;link_dests:126;type:true	$$108 \mathrm{ms} \pm 373 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.328 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:0;link_dests:0;type:false	$$62.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 324 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.753 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$74.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 465 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.32 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$80.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 343 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.927 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:2;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$88.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 436 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.45 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=0	0	$$51.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 338 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.069 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=255	1,resolve_depths=inherit:1;values:255;properties:255;links:127;link_dests:126;type:true	$$78.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 328 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.213 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:0;link_dests:0;type:false	$$57.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 331 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.834 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$66.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 367 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.060 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$68.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 290 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.310 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:2;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$67.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 295 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.142 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$

scenarios

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
full_test	query-limited	$$137 \mathrm{ms} \pm 464 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.663 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
full_test	query-unlimited	$$131 \mathrm{ms} \pm 490 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.965 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
linked_queries	query-limited	$$41.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 200 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-59.355 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
linked_queries	query-unlimited	$$580 \mathrm{ms} \pm 905 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-5.359 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph