Update Rust crate proc-macro2 to v1.0.103

[hash-worker]

This PR contains the following updates:

Package	Type	Update	Change
proc-macro2	workspace.dependencies	patch	=1.0.101 -> =1.0.103

---

Warning

Some dependencies could not be looked up. Check the Dependency Dashboard for more information.

---

Release Notes

dtolnay/proc-macro2 (proc-macro2)

v1.0.103

Compare Source

• Add semver-exempt Literal methods str_value, cstr_value, byte_str_value (#​525)

v1.0.102

Compare Source

• Fix interaction of Display impls for TokenStream and Ident with formatting specifiers for padding, alignment, width (#​523, #​524)

---

Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - "before 4am every weekday,every weekend" (UTC), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Enabled.

♻ Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.

---

• If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

---

This PR has been generated by Renovate Bot.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 55.66%. Comparing base (de3ee86) to head (0e12ad9).
⚠️ Report is 8 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #7970   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   55.66%   55.66%           
=======================================
  Files        1112     1113    +1     
  Lines      101195   101194    -1     
  Branches     4690     4691    +1     
=======================================
  Hits        56329    56329           
+ Misses      44205    44204    -1     
  Partials      661      661           

Flag	Coverage Δ
apps.hash-ai-worker-ts	1.32% <ø> (ø)
apps.hash-api	0.00% <ø> (ø)
blockprotocol.type-system	40.84% <ø> (ø)
local.harpc-client	51.24% <ø> (ø)
local.hash-backend-utils	4.08% <ø> (+<0.01%)	⬆️
local.hash-graph-sdk	10.88% <ø> (ø)
local.hash-isomorphic-utils	0.00% <ø> (ø)
rust.antsi	0.00% <ø> (ø)
rust.error-stack	90.85% <ø> (ø)
rust.harpc-codec	84.22% <ø> (ø)
rust.harpc-net	96.08% <ø> (ø)
rust.harpc-tower	66.80% <ø> (ø)
rust.harpc-types	0.00% <ø> (ø)
rust.harpc-wire-protocol	92.23% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-codec	71.25% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-api	2.89% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-authorization	62.50% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-postgres-store	20.38% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-store	30.70% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-temporal-versioning	47.68% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-types	0.00% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-validation	83.29% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-ast	87.17% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-compiletest	53.03% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-core	81.27% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-diagnostics	72.28% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-eval	68.56% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-hir	90.29% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-syntax-jexpr	93.94% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
• 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

[graphite-app]

Graphite Automations

"Request Rust reviewers once CI passes" took an action on this PR • (11/01/25)

1 reviewer was added to this PR based on Tim Diekmann's automation.

[github-actions]

Benchmark results

@rust/hash-graph-benches – Integrations

policy_resolution_large

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 2002	$$27.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 142 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.848 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.22 \mathrm{ms} \pm 10.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.267 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 1001	$$12.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 78.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.432 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 3314	$$42.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 297 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.14 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$13.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 78.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.09 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 1526	$$23.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 155 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.935 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 2078	$$27.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 177 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-40.456 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.63 \mathrm{ms} \pm 16.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-76.887 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 1033	$$13.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 106 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-52.823 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

policy_resolution_medium

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 102	$$3.64 \mathrm{ms} \pm 15.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.445 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.83 \mathrm{ms} \pm 17.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.844 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 51	$$3.20 \mathrm{ms} \pm 13.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.147 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 269	$$5.07 \mathrm{ms} \pm 23.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.269 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.38 \mathrm{ms} \pm 11.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.336 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 107	$$3.96 \mathrm{ms} \pm 17.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.426 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 133	$$4.34 \mathrm{ms} \pm 24.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.17 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.27 \mathrm{ms} \pm 14.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.574 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 63	$$3.89 \mathrm{ms} \pm 19.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.552 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

policy_resolution_none

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 2	$$2.49 \mathrm{ms} \pm 10.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}4.55 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.46 \mathrm{ms} \pm 10.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}5.10 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 1	$$2.53 \mathrm{ms} \pm 10.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}4.74 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 8	$$2.72 \mathrm{ms} \pm 11.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.55 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.62 \mathrm{ms} \pm 13.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}5.03 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 3	$$2.80 \mathrm{ms} \pm 11.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.92 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

policy_resolution_small

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 52	$$2.89 \mathrm{ms} \pm 14.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}6.11 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.55 \mathrm{ms} \pm 11.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}6.42 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 25	$$2.74 \mathrm{ms} \pm 10.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}7.77 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 94	$$3.30 \mathrm{ms} \pm 13.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}7.39 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.78 \mathrm{ms} \pm 16.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}5.69 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 26	$$3.00 \mathrm{ms} \pm 8.21 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}5.08 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 66	$$3.23 \mathrm{ms} \pm 15.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}8.34 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.73 \mathrm{ms} \pm 11.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}5.64 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 29	$$3.05 \mathrm{ms} \pm 15.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}7.24 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

read_scaling_complete

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id;one_depth	1 entities	$$37.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 140 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.386 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	10 entities	$$84.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 413 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.774 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	25 entities	$$41.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 190 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.682 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	5 entities	$$44.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 192 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.12 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	50 entities	$$52.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 213 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.33 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	1 entities	$$39.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 148 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.52 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	10 entities	$$495 \mathrm{ms} \pm 999 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.076 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	25 entities	$$97.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 371 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.431 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	5 entities	$$82.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 360 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.27 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	50 entities	$$285 \mathrm{ms} \pm 783 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.201 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	1 entities	$$14.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 64.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.19 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	10 entities	$$14.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 84.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.493 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	25 entities	$$15.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 68.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.67 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	5 entities	$$14.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 68.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.63 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	50 entities	$$17.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 117 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.68 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

read_scaling_linkless

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	1 entities	$$14.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 70.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.71 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	10 entities	$$14.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 66.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.746 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	100 entities	$$14.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 62.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.19 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	1000 entities	$$15.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 80.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.56 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	10000 entities	$$22.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 149 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.358 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_entity

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/block/v/1	$$28.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 269 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.472 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/book/v/1	$$29.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 271 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.422 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/building/v/1	$$30.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 225 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.96 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/organization/v/1	$$29.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 239 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.665 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/page/v/2	$$29.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 277 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.145 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/person/v/1	$$30.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 352 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.53 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/playlist/v/1	$$29.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 309 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.35 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/song/v/1	$$29.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 309 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.268 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/uk-address/v/1	$$29.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 293 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.808 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_entity_type

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
get_entity_type_by_id	Account ID: bf5a9ef5-dc3b-43cf-a291-6210c0321eba	$$8.81 \mathrm{ms} \pm 38.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.262 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_multiple_entities

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=0	0	$$55.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 290 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.304 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=255	1,resolve_depths=inherit:1;values:255;properties:255;links:127;link_dests:126;type:true	$$107 \mathrm{ms} \pm 451 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.597 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:0;link_dests:0;type:false	$$61.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 337 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.026 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$69.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 280 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.102 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$79.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 353 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.057 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:2;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$85.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 317 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.511 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=0	0	$$49.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 211 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.145 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=255	1,resolve_depths=inherit:1;values:255;properties:255;links:127;link_dests:126;type:true	$$78.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 372 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.894 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:0;link_dests:0;type:false	$$56.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 280 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.656 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$64.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 281 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.249 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$67.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 337 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.659 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:2;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$67.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 365 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.184 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$

scenarios

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
full_test	query-limited	$$133 \mathrm{ms} \pm 572 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.748 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
full_test	query-unlimited	$$135 \mathrm{ms} \pm 574 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.806 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
linked_queries	query-limited	$$40.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 183 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-60.856 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
linked_queries	query-unlimited	$$580 \mathrm{ms} \pm 864 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-5.136 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph