Update Rust crate pretty to v0.12.5

[hash-worker]

This PR contains the following updates:

Package	Type	Update	Change
pretty	workspace.dependencies	patch	=0.12.4 -> =0.12.5

---

Warning

Some dependencies could not be looked up. Check the Dependency Dashboard for more information.

---

Release Notes

Marwes/pretty.rs (pretty)

v0.12.5

Compare Source

---

Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - "before 4am every weekday,every weekend" (UTC), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Enabled.

♻ Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.

---

• If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

---

This PR has been generated by Renovate Bot.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 55.66%. Comparing base (de3ee86) to head (0313459).
⚠️ Report is 6 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #7969   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   55.66%   55.66%           
=======================================
  Files        1112     1113    +1     
  Lines      101195   101194    -1     
  Branches     4690     4691    +1     
=======================================
+ Hits        56329    56330    +1     
+ Misses      44205    44203    -2     
  Partials      661      661           

Flag	Coverage Δ
apps.hash-ai-worker-ts	1.32% <ø> (ø)
apps.hash-api	0.00% <ø> (ø)
blockprotocol.type-system	40.84% <ø> (ø)
local.harpc-client	51.24% <ø> (ø)
local.hash-backend-utils	4.08% <ø> (+<0.01%)	⬆️
local.hash-graph-sdk	10.88% <ø> (ø)
local.hash-isomorphic-utils	0.00% <ø> (ø)
rust.antsi	0.00% <ø> (ø)
rust.error-stack	90.85% <ø> (ø)
rust.harpc-codec	84.22% <ø> (ø)
rust.harpc-net	96.10% <ø> (+0.01%)	⬆️
rust.harpc-tower	66.80% <ø> (ø)
rust.harpc-types	0.00% <ø> (ø)
rust.harpc-wire-protocol	92.23% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-codec	71.25% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-api	2.89% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-authorization	62.50% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-postgres-store	20.38% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-store	30.70% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-temporal-versioning	47.68% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-types	0.00% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-validation	83.29% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-ast	87.17% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-compiletest	53.03% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-core	81.27% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-diagnostics	72.28% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-eval	68.56% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-hir	90.29% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-syntax-jexpr	93.94% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
• 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

[github-actions]

Benchmark results

@rust/hash-graph-benches – Integrations

policy_resolution_large

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 2002	$$27.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 146 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.883 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.22 \mathrm{ms} \pm 13.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.21 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 1001	$$12.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 57.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.802 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 3314	$$41.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 271 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.529 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$13.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 121 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.13 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 1526	$$22.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 166 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.560 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 2078	$$26.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 175 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-39.429 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.59 \mathrm{ms} \pm 13.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-78.550 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 1033	$$11.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 57.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-60.589 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

policy_resolution_medium

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 102	$$3.58 \mathrm{ms} \pm 17.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.619 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.73 \mathrm{ms} \pm 9.66 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-4.810 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 51	$$3.13 \mathrm{ms} \pm 17.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.468 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 269	$$4.99 \mathrm{ms} \pm 22.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.068 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.32 \mathrm{ms} \pm 12.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.157 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 107	$$3.88 \mathrm{ms} \pm 18.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.859 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 133	$$4.27 \mathrm{ms} \pm 21.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.976 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.19 \mathrm{ms} \pm 14.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.036 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 63	$$3.83 \mathrm{ms} \pm 20.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.315 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

policy_resolution_none

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 2	$$2.47 \mathrm{ms} \pm 8.69 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}6.49 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.43 \mathrm{ms} \pm 8.71 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}6.20 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 1	$$2.54 \mathrm{ms} \pm 9.83 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}7.17 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 8	$$2.74 \mathrm{ms} \pm 12.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}5.31 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.58 \mathrm{ms} \pm 14.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}5.20 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 3	$$2.79 \mathrm{ms} \pm 11.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.21 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

policy_resolution_small

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 52	$$2.90 \mathrm{ms} \pm 12.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}5.96 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.56 \mathrm{ms} \pm 11.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}6.47 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 25	$$2.76 \mathrm{ms} \pm 9.66 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}7.75 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 94	$$3.33 \mathrm{ms} \pm 16.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}8.77 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.77 \mathrm{ms} \pm 9.72 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}4.71 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 26	$$3.04 \mathrm{ms} \pm 12.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}6.83 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 66	$$3.21 \mathrm{ms} \pm 11.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}7.27 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.76 \mathrm{ms} \pm 15.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}5.45 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 29	$$3.03 \mathrm{ms} \pm 12.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}6.78 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

read_scaling_complete

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id;one_depth	1 entities	$$37.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 137 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.95 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	10 entities	$$83.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 294 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.345 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	25 entities	$$41.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 155 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.52 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	5 entities	$$44.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 230 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.65 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	50 entities	$$52.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 259 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.07 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	1 entities	$$38.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 146 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.258 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	10 entities	$$490 \mathrm{ms} \pm 1.21 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{gray}0.054 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	25 entities	$$95.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 419 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.38 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	5 entities	$$81.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 286 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.496 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	50 entities	$$285 \mathrm{ms} \pm 871 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-10.584 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	1 entities	$$14.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 61.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}5.03 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	10 entities	$$15.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 70.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.00 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	25 entities	$$15.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 54.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.20 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	5 entities	$$14.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 57.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}5.28 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	50 entities	$$18.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 77.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.52 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

read_scaling_linkless

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	1 entities	$$14.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 67.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}4.84 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	10 entities	$$14.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 78.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.35 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	100 entities	$$14.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 57.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.46 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	1000 entities	$$15.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 75.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.30 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	10000 entities	$$22.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 162 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.025 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_entity

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/block/v/1	$$28.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 253 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-4.425 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/book/v/1	$$29.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 268 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.03 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/building/v/1	$$29.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 245 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.339 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/organization/v/1	$$29.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 263 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.721 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/page/v/2	$$28.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 280 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.160 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/person/v/1	$$28.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 247 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.162 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/playlist/v/1	$$29.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 307 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.304 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/song/v/1	$$29.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 269 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.338 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/uk-address/v/1	$$29.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 283 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.163 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_entity_type

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
get_entity_type_by_id	Account ID: bf5a9ef5-dc3b-43cf-a291-6210c0321eba	$$8.82 \mathrm{ms} \pm 37.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.132 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_multiple_entities

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=0	0	$$55.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 326 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.74 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=255	1,resolve_depths=inherit:1;values:255;properties:255;links:127;link_dests:126;type:true	$$106 \mathrm{ms} \pm 318 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.251 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:0;link_dests:0;type:false	$$60.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 296 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.856 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$69.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 347 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.241 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$79.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 360 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.35 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:2;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$85.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 303 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.256 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=0	0	$$48.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 276 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.418 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=255	1,resolve_depths=inherit:1;values:255;properties:255;links:127;link_dests:126;type:true	$$77.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 336 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.301 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:0;link_dests:0;type:false	$$55.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 250 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.038 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$63.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 346 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.210 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$66.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 340 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.166 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:2;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$66.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 374 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.228 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$

scenarios

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
full_test	query-limited	$$140 \mathrm{ms} \pm 535 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}4.64 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
full_test	query-unlimited	$$136 \mathrm{ms} \pm 493 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}4.74 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
linked_queries	query-limited	$$41.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 201 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-59.917 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
linked_queries	query-unlimited	$$582 \mathrm{ms} \pm 1.00 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{gray}1.55 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

[graphite-app]

Graphite Automations

"Request Rust reviewers once CI passes" took an action on this PR • (11/01/25)

1 reviewer was added to this PR based on Tim Diekmann's automation.

[TimDiekmann]

@TimDiekmann approved this PR from Slack with Graphite