-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 8
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add a tensor_mul operator #114
Conversation
85dec89
to
088b246
Compare
caa9764
to
4bd2440
Compare
Fixed 3e57619 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
almost good to me
"contravariant indices."); | ||
|
||
private: | ||
TensorType& m_tensor; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes that will avoid the copy. I think we adhere to the rules of zero and five ? If we define one of them we must define them all. I think we also want to delete the copy and move semantic.
After that we are good |
Co-authored-by: Thomas Padioleau <[email protected]>
It seems like you haven't finished working on this PR so it has been put back into draft. Please remove the draft status when the PR can run tests without being interrupted. |
This PR is failing tests so it has been put back into draft. Please remove the draft status when the tests pass. |
1 similar comment
This PR is failing tests so it has been put back into draft. Please remove the draft status when the tests pass. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Let's merge that
Add a
tensor_mul
operator. Fixes #76