Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

update agent #233

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 6, 2024
Merged

update agent #233

merged 1 commit into from
Dec 6, 2024

Conversation

gyliu513
Copy link
Owner

@gyliu513 gyliu513 commented Dec 6, 2024

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features
    • Introduced new attributes for AI agents under categories such as Workflow, Tools, Agent, Task, and Interaction.
  • Improvements
    • Updated naming conventions for attributes to enhance clarity and consistency throughout the documentation.
    • Revised examples to align with the new attribute structure, facilitating better understanding for users.

@gyliu513 gyliu513 merged commit dac6ecc into main Dec 6, 2024
1 check passed
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 6, 2024

Caution

Review failed

The pull request is closed.

Walkthrough

The changes primarily involve updates to the ai-agent-spans.md document, focusing on the structure and naming conventions of AI Agent attributes. New attributes have been introduced under categories such as Workflow, Tools, Agent, Task, and Interaction. The previous agentops prefixed attributes have been replaced with ai_agent prefixed attributes to standardize naming. The Common Attributes section has been revised accordingly, and examples at the end of the document have been updated to reflect these changes.

Changes

File Change Summary
agent-semantic-convention/ai-agent-spans.md Introduced new attributes prefixed with ai_agent across various categories; replaced agentops attributes with ai_agent attributes; updated examples to align with new naming conventions.

Poem

In the meadow where agents play,
New names bloom like flowers in May.
With workflows and tasks all in line,
Clarity shines, oh how divine!
A hop, a skip, to the future we race,
With ai_agent leading the chase! 🐇✨


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between b48f7b2 and 9dc842b.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • agent-semantic-convention/ai-agent-spans.md (1 hunks)

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@gyliu513 gyliu513 deleted the agent branch December 6, 2024 14:49
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant