Skip to content

Document 'experimental_enhanced' compatibility mode #1630

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 7 commits into from
Jun 25, 2024

Conversation

joanlopez
Copy link
Contributor

@joanlopez joanlopez commented Jun 21, 2024

What?

It documents the new experimental_enhanced compatibility mode.

Checklist

  • I have used a meaningful title for the PR.
  • I have described the changes I've made in the "What?" section above.
  • I have performed a self-review of my changes.
  • I have run the npm start command locally and verified that the changes look good.
  • I have made my changes in the docs/sources/next folder of the documentation.
  • I have reflected my changes in the docs/sources/v{most_recent_release} folder of the documentation.
  • I have reflected my changes in the relevant folders of the two previous k6 versions of the documentation (if still applicable to previous versions).
  • I have made my changes in the docs/sources/next folder of the documentation.

Related PR(s)/Issue(s)

We might also want to update:

@joanlopez joanlopez added Area: OSS Content Improvements or additions to community/oss documentation type/docs labels Jun 21, 2024
@joanlopez joanlopez requested a review from szkiba June 21, 2024 17:46
@joanlopez joanlopez self-assigned this Jun 21, 2024
@joanlopez
Copy link
Contributor Author

Thanks so much @heitortsergent! 💟

@joanlopez joanlopez merged commit ce1ceca into main Jun 25, 2024
5 checks passed
@joanlopez joanlopez deleted the experimental_enhanced branch June 25, 2024 06:12
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Area: OSS Content Improvements or additions to community/oss documentation type/docs
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants